[Peace-discuss] Another proliferation problem: The Saudis consider the bomb

patton paul ppatton at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
Fri Sep 19 19:17:27 CDT 2003


 Saudis Consider Nuclear Bomb
by Ewen MacAskill and Ian Traynor in Vienna


Saudi Arabia, in response to the current upheaval in the Middle East, has
embarked on a strategic review that includes acquiring nuclear weapons,
the Guardian has learned.

This new threat of proliferation in one of the most dangerous regions of
the world comes on top of a crisis over Iran's alleged nuclear program.

A strategy paper being considered at the highest levels in Riyadh sets out
three options:

z To acquire a nuclear capability as a deterrent;

z To maintain or enter into an alliance with an existing nuclear power
that would offer protection;

z To try to reach a regional agreement on having a nuclear-free Middle
East.

Until now, the assumption in Washington was that Saudi Arabia was content
to remain under the US nuclear umbrella. But the relationship between
Saudi Arabia and the US has steadily worsened since the September 11
attacks on New York and Washington: 15 of the 19 attackers were Saudi.

It is not known whether Saudi Arabia has taken a decision on any of the
three options. But the fact that it is prepared to contemplate the nuclear
option is a worrying development.

United Nations officials and nuclear arms analysts said the Saudi review
reflected profound insecurities generated by the volatility in the Middle
East, Riyadh's estrangement with Washington and the weakening of its
reliance on the US nuclear umbrella.

They pointed to the Saudi worries about an Iranian program and to the
absence of any international pressure on Israel, which has an estimated
200 nuclear devices.

"Our antennae are up," said a senior UN official watching worldwide
nuclear proliferation efforts. "The international community can rest
assured we do keep track of such events if they go beyond talk."

Saudi Arabia does not regard Iran, a past adversary with which Riyadh has
restored relations, as a direct threat. But it is unnerved by the
possibility of Iran and Israel having nuclear weapons.

Riyadh is also worried about a string of apparent leaks in American papers
from the US administration critical of Saudi Arabia.

David Albright, director of the Institute for Science and International
Security, a Washington thinktank, said he doubted whether the Saudis would
try to build a nuclear bomb, preferring instead to try to buy a nuclear
warhead. They would be the first of the world's eight or nine nuclear
powers to have bought rather than built the bomb.

"There has always been worries that the Saudis would go down this path if
provoked," said Mr Albright. "There is growing US hostility which could
lead to the removal of the US umbrella and will the Saudis be intimidated
by Iran? They've got to be nervous."

UN officials said there have been rumors going back 20 years that the
Saudis wanted to pay Pakistan to do the research and development on
nuclear weapons.

In 1988, Saudi bought from China intermediate-range missiles capable of
reaching any part of the Middle East with a nuclear warhead.

Four years ago, Saudi Arabia sent a defense team to Pakistan to tour its
secret nuclear facilities and to be briefed by Abdul Qader Khan, the
father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb.

A UN official said: "There's obviously a lot of restlessness in the Middle
East. Regional insecurity tends to produce a quest for a nuclear umbrella.
The Saudis have the money and could provide it to Pakistan."

Mr Albright said the Saudis would face a long haul if they were determined
to acquire nuclear weapons. He doubted whether anyone would sell.

Arab countries yesterday urged the International Atomic Energy Authority,
the UN nuclear watchdog, to get tough with Israel to let inspectors assess
its nuclear program. in line with similar pressure on Iran.

Oman's ambassador to the IAEA, Salim al-Riyami, speaking on behalf of the
Arab League, which represents Arab states, said it was time to get tough
with Israel. "I think it's time to deal with this issue more substantively
than before," he said.

 Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003




More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list