[Peace-discuss] bring them home now

[Dlind49 at aol.com]

Military Families Against the War

By Dave Lindorff | 9.5.03 print | email | comment  

  
Stan Goff: Bring the troops home now. 
  
 
Millions of Americans are anxious about and even opposed to the American war 
on Iraq and to the bloody occupation that has followed it. But for Stan Goff, 
it’s personal.

A career soldier and Vietnam veteran, Goff is an organizer of Bring Them Home 
Now, a fledgling movement of hundreds of relatives of U.S. troops in Iraq who 
say their family members in uniform are being made to fight an illegal and 
immoral war. 

Goff is also the parent of one of those soldiers, a son who just last month 
was sent into Iraq to work as an army mechanic. “My son wrote an e-mail back 
that he’s already been under attack by mortars twice,” says Goff.

Bring Them Home Now is the combined project of two anti-war 
organizations—Military Families Speak Out and Veterans for Peace—and has seen its membership 
soar to more than 700 families over the course of the Iraq war. Because its 
members have relatives at risk in that conflict, the group poses perhaps one of 
the biggest threats to the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld war axis in Washington.

In These Times spoke with the now-retired Master Sergeant Goff by phone at 
his office with North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, an 
environmental organization based in Durham.

What has the response been to an organization of anti-war soldiers’ families?

Since I got out of the army in 1996, I’ve never seen anything catch fire like 
this. It sort of started out with that idiotic comment by George Bush in 
early July taunting the Iraqi guerrillas with the phrase “Bring ’em on.” I wrote 
a piece condemning that statement in Counterpunch and got thousands of 
responses to it. Forty percent of them were veterans or military families, and they 
overwhelmingly supported my criticism of Bush. This is especially impressive 
because a lot of military families feel that there is a risk in speaking out.

What are they afraid of?

Soldiers in uniform do not have the First Amendment freedom to criticize 
their superior officers about war-related matters, and that goes right up to the 
Commander-in-Chief. The families, of course, have their First Amendment 
freedom, but the reality is that the officer and enlisted personnel management 
systems control a soldier’s career, and they can be extremely subjective. One bad 
line in your file can ruin your career.

Why are we seeing such a movement among military families with this conflict?

We’re not saying bring the troops home because they’re suffering hardship 
and danger. Most soldiers know that hardship and danger are part of their job. 
What we’re saying is bring the troops home because they are facing hardship and 
danger in a war that is immoral and illegal. 

The thing is, most of the kids that are over there believed what they were 
told, that they’d be greeted as liberators, like the allies marching into Paris. 
Instead it was like marching into Mogadishu. So now they and their families 
are asking why are they there subjecting themselves to 120 degree temperatures 
and daily attacks if [Iraqis] don’t want them there?

Are you being harassed by the government? Do you worry that you will be?

There are some people who try to call us whiners. But really there has been 
no official harassment. It would be incredibly foolish for the administration 
to retaliate against us. … We have a sort of immunity from being charged with 
being bad Americans, and it’s an identity we guard carefully.

Do you feel like this is Vietnam all over again?

In some ways it’s similar, and in some ways it’s very different. The terrain 
is different, and you don’t have the Cold War underlying it, though the Bush 
Administration seems to be trying hard to create a new global enemy like that.

What is happening that is similar is that, in order to limit the casualties, 
which are raising the level of concern at home, the Pentagon has essentially 
shut down all operations. The troops have been pulled back behind the wire into 
hardened bases. The problem with that is that when you pull back, you hand 
the countryside over to the enemy, and then the static positions set you up as 
targets, which are under surveillance by the guerrillas.

It’s a classic no-win situation for the United States now, with the Iraqis 
executing a classic guerrilla strategy of going after the softer targets like 
the United Nations and the pipelines, and I frankly don’t see how we get out of 
it.

That sounds pretty pessimistic.

I’m an optimist really, though. Maybe a short-term pessimist but a long-term 
optimist. You know, the government can spin, spin, spin, like with [U.S. 
occupation coordinator L. Paul] Bremer saying over and over that we’re “turning 
the corner.” But eventually reality reasserts itself.

I think that the Bush Administration will collapse from its own hubris. You 
know, [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld is not the smart guy people in the 
media say he is. He is a fool who thinks he’s smarter than his generals. He has 
an outrageous faith in technology’s ability to solve military problems, and he 
seems to have Bush firmly in tow. But they’re in a box. They’re in the 
process of self-destruction.

The problem is that when it’s over, we’ll have a whole bunch of damaged 
people coming home sick, lame, and crazy. All I want is for my son to come home in 
the same condition that he left in.  



Dave Lindorff, a regular contributor to In These Times, is the author of 
Killing Time, a new book on the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal.