[Peace-discuss] Who did the Ashura bombings?

[C. G. Estabrook]

March 2, 2004
A Convenient Carnage
All This Talk of Civil War, Now This

By ROBERT FISK
The Independent/UK

Odd, isn't it? There never has been a civil war in Iraq. I have never
heard a single word of animosity between Sunnis and Shias in Iraq.

Al-Qa'ida has never uttered a threat against Shias - even though al-Qa'ida
is a Sunni-only organisation. Yet for weeks, the American occupation
authorities have been warning us about civil war, have even produced a
letter said to have been written by an al-Qa'ida operative, advocating a
Sunni-Shia conflict. Normally sane journalists have enthusiastically taken
up this theme. Civil war.

Somehow I don't believe it. No, I don't believe the Americans were behind
yesterday's carnage despite the screams of accusation by the Iraqi
survivors yesterday. But I do worry about the Iraqi exile groups who think
that their own actions might produce what the Americans want: a fear of
civil war so intense that Iraqis will go along with any plan the United
States produces for Mesopotamia.

I think of the French OAS in Algeria in 1962, setting off bombs among
France's Muslim Algerian community. I recall the desperate efforts of the
French authorities to set Algerian Muslim against Algerian Muslim which
led to half a million dead souls.

And I'm afraid I also think of Ireland and the bombings in Dublin and
Monaghan in 1974, which, as the years go by, appear to have an ever closer
link, via Protestant "loyalist" paramilitaries, to elements of British
military security.

But the bombs in Karbala and Baghdad were clearly co-ordinated. The same
brain worked behind them. Was it a Sunni brain? When the occupation
authorities' spokesman suggested yesterday that it was the work of
al-Qa'ida, he must have known what he was saying: that al-Qa'ida is a
Sunni movement, that the victims were Shias.

It's not that I believe al-Qa'ida incapable of such a bloodbath. But I ask
myself why the Americans are rubbing this Sunni-Shia thing so hard. Let's
turn the glass round the other way. If a violent Sunni movement wished to
evict the Americans from Iraq - and there is indeed a resistance movement
fighting very cruelly to do just that - why would it want to turn the Shia
population of Iraq, 60 per cent of Iraqis, against them? The last thing
such a resistance would want is to have the majority of Iraqis against it.

So what about al-Qa'ida? Repeatedly, the Americans have told us that the
suicide bombers were "foreigners". And so they may be. But can we have
some identities, nationalities? The US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld,
has talked of the hundreds of "foreign" fighters crossing Saudi Arabia's
"porous" borders.

The US press have dutifully repeated this. The Iraqi police keep
announcing that they have found the bombers' passports, so can we have the
numbers?

We are entering a dark and sinister period of Iraqi history. But an
occupation authority which should regard civil war as the last prospect it
ever wants to contemplate, keeps shouting "civil war" in our ears and I
worry about that. Especially when the bombs make it real.

***