[Peace-discuss] Concord Ma. Contamination

Dlind49 at aol.com Dlind49 at aol.com
Mon Mar 8 19:26:44 CST 2004


A radioactive nightmare in Concord, Massachusetts 
Friday, March 05, 2004 
By Ed Ericson, E/The Environmental Magazine 


The waitress at the ice cream shop in Concord, Massachusetts, was surprised. 
"A Superfund site?" she asked incredulously. "On Main Street?" It's not just a 
Superfund site but one dubbed by a cleanup contractor as "near the tip of the 
peak in terms of [cleanup] difficulty." It's radioactive.

Concord, the crucible of the American Revolution, where the "shot heard 
'round the world" rang out on April 19, 1775, is a Boston suburb filled with 
professionals and stately homes. Tourists still come to see the war sites and to 
visit the bucolic Walden Pond that Thoreau celebrated. Few know about the nuclear 
waste dump at 2229 Main Street.

But this shady burg of 15,000 residents quietly struggles with its legacy as 
the maker of depleted uranium slugs for the U.S. military's latest wars. The 
soil more than a mile from the nuclear dump is radioactive. A 1993 
epidemiological study found the town's residents suffered higher rates of cancer than the 
state average.

Today, atop and buried beneath a low hill above a cranberry bog lie more than 
3,800 barrels of radioactive and toxic waste, subject to a government-paid 
cleanup estimated to take 10 years and cost at least $50 million.

The company responsible for most of the waste, Starmet, declared bankruptcy 
in 2002. Massachusetts has sued Starmet and several related companies to 
enforce state laws against radioactive dumping, but so far has had little success on 
the legal front. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hastily concluded 
that Starmet was broke and has made no move to charge it for the pending 
cleanup.

"All of the people who benefited and made millions from the process are not 
being tagged at all with the cleanup process," said Mark Roberts, an 
environmental lawyer and member of Citizens Research and Environmental Watch, a citizens 
group that has fought to get the site cleaned up for more than 20 years.

Since 1958, Starmet (formerly known as Nuclear Metals) processed depleted 
uranium into tank shells and armor for the U.S. Army, using caustic acids, 
beryllium, and other dangerous substances. From the early 1970s until 1985, the 
company dumped depleted uranium into an unlined lagoon on the property, sending a 
toxic plume of radiation, heavy metals, and solvents migrating into the 
groundwater, fouling at least two wells.

The company resisted pressure to clean up the lagoon until 1997, when the 
pond was finally dug up and the soils shipped to a low-level nuclear waste dump 
in Utah. That project was costly, though, and the remediation company sued 
Starmet for unpaid bills associated with it. Just about this time, military orders 
for depleted uranium munitions stopped too. Starmet began to lose money.

In May 2001, Starmet officials illegally shipped 1,700 barrels of depleted 
uranium "greensalt" from a company facility in Barnwell, South Carolina, to 
Concord. The cash-strapped company was cleaning the South Carolina facility in 
preparation for sale, EPA documents say.

When Massachusetts' health and environmental officials protested, Starmet's 
president, Robert Quinn, threatened to abandon the Concord site and stick the 
state with the cost of cleanup. In 2002, after the state forced bankrupt 
Starmet into receivership, the company did abandon the site for several weeks, 
according to EPA records.

Nowadays Quinn, who angrily blames the U.S. Army for Starmet's bankruptcy, 
sits at a lonely desk in a low building on the site while a few security guards 
watch over the mess.

And what a mess it is. Conservatively speaking, there is at least 20 times 
more depleted uranium on and under Starmet's 46 acres on Main Street, Concord, 
than the 340 tons that were fired in all of Iraq during the first Gulf War. 
There are tons of beryllium - a probable carcinogen - in the soil and leaking 
from buried drums. And in a recently discovered area known as the "old dump" 
there are unknown substances, possibly including high-level radioactive waste and 
exotic explosives, dating from the effort to build the first atomic bombs. 

Much of the work during the next four to five years will consist of 
determining what's in the barrels buried in the old dump, according to Bruce Thompson 
of De Maximis, Inc., the engineering group chosen by EPA to head the cleanup 
process. He says some preliminary research indicates that exotic radioactive and 
heavy metals may have been buried there by MIT scientists during the 
Manhattan Project. He is also concerned about the potential presence of an explosive, 
zirconium azide.

"That's something I don't want to hit with a backhoe," Thompson told a town 
subcommittee meeting in September.

That Thompson and the EPA arrived in Concord at all is credit to the efforts 
of a small group of committed activists. Citizens Research and Environmental 
Watch (CREW) is led by Rick Oleson, a Princeton- and Harvard-educated radiation 
biologist and toxicologist whose late father was a nuclear physicist. Oleson 
spent part of his childhood in a house near the factory. State records show 
the most contaminated area on the site is adjacent to Camp Thoreau, a summer 
camp for children ages three and up.

"It's one industrial setting in a very residential area," said Oleson. 
"People later could put a house there and dig a well there, or grow vegetables."

Oleson and fellow CREW members are focusing their efforts to make sure the 
EPA demands that the dump is cleaned up to a "residential level," rather than to 
the looser standards allowable for an "industrial" site.

Jeffrey McNabola was a member of Concerned Citizens of Concord, CREW's 
predecessor, in the 1970s and early 1980s. He notes that the group was warning 
people about the dangers of depleted uranium and other activities at Nuclear Metals 
for decades before anyone in officialdom gave them any credence.

"There was a cavalier attitude about depleted uranium," he said. "They said 
that it's safe as chocolate milk."

Even Oleson took years to conclude that Nuclear Metals' activities were 
unacceptable.

"I used to cross-country ski and run back there," he said of the woods 
bordering the dumpsite. "It was a very pretty place ... and there was this big pond. 
It was full of psychedelic colors."

Oleson and CREW are hunkering down for a long battle, keeping a wary eye on 
the EPA and its cleanup contractors. Loath to link deaths from cancer or rare 
diseases to the factory and its dump, Oleson (who works for Monsanto) and 
others in CREW strive to hue a strict scientific line, lest they appear to be 
"radicals."

The strategy seems to be working.

"The real story behind the story I tell people is that a few people 
volunteered their time to really do something that needed doing," said Oleson. "And for 
years they were dismissed and made fun of. And they totally turned the town 
around." 


Related Links

Citizens Research and Environmental Watch 
Nuclear Information and Research Service 
Source: E/The Environmental Magazine



http://www.enn.com/news/2004-03-05/s_12993.asp



More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list