[Peace-discuss] Pentagon Archipelago

[C. G. Estabrook]

Yes, I should have mentioned that you'd posted the Observer piece,
particularly since the Observer (unlike the associated Guardian) favored
the invasion. And of course you're right that the real issue is the
"barbarism being committed in our name" -- by the government we're
responsible for, against all the pious assurances we grew up with about
the rule of law in the US.  Arbitrary imprisonment and torture are shown
by the Bush regime to be as American as cherry pie, to borrow a phrase.
--CGE


On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Randall Cotton wrote:

> Once you learn the story of the "Tipton Three" (and the Observer
> article mentioned, for which I posted a link previously, goes into
> much greater detail), you realize that "intelligence" which is
> "provided" by Guantanamo prisoners may be practically meaningless. The
> tortured will say anything their torturers want to hear. The bigger
> issue, of course, is the horrific, utterly indefensible barbarism
> being committed in our name.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu>
> To: <Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 3:01 PM
> Subject: [Peace-discuss] Pentagon Archipelago
> 
> 
> [The NYT is fronting an administration propaganda campaign about how
> "valuable" the prison camp at Guantanamo is. E.g., from yesterday's Times:
> "Military officials say prisoners at the detention center here have
> provided a stream of intelligence to interrogators during the past two
> years, including detailed information about Al Qaeda's recruitment of
> Muslim men in Europe. Military and intelligence officials also said those
> detainees who were cooperative had provided information about Al Qaeda's
> chemical and biological weapons efforts, had spoken about the training of
> suicide bombers, and had described Al Qaeda's use of charities to raise
> money for its aims..."  Another story is told by those who were
> immediately released by the British when they were turned over by American
> military jailers. Here's an account.  --CGE]
> 
> Night Sweats
> 
> By Chris Floyd
> 
> 03/21/04 (Moscow Times) -- This is the story of three innocent men, held
> in brutal captivity for more than two years; three innocent men, stripped,
> blinded, beaten, tortured, caged and silenced, all in the name of freedom
> and civilization; three innocent men, ground into the dust by an
> implacable power that defends its "enduring moral values" with the boot in
> the groin, the gun to the head -- and the abetting of atrocity and murder.
> 
> It's the story of three Britons released last week from the U.S.
> concentration camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba -- 26 months after they began
> their progress through the guts of the Pentagon Archipelago, the chain of
> U.S. detention camps and "interrogation centers" that now encircle the
> Earth. In the Observer -- a pro-war British paper -- Shafiq Rasul, Ruhal
> Ahmed and Asif Iqbal from Tipton, England, told reporter David Rose of
> their sojourn in the Bush Regime's legal purgatory.
> 
> The three men, lifelong friends in their early 20s, went to Pakistan in
> September 2001 for Iqbal's wedding. The following month, as Afghanistan's
> civil war flared under the shadow of the impending U.S. attack, the
> friends joined Muslim relief efforts in war-ravaged Afghan villages. As
> avowed moderates, they were under constant threat from the Taliban -- the
> virulent extremists who'd been armed, funded and sustained in power by
> U.S. ally Pakistan and the Bush Family's business partners in Saudi
> Arabia, as Salon.com reports.
> 
> When American bombs started falling, the friends tried to flee the
> country. But they were trapped in Kunduz with thousands of refugees when
> the city fell to U.S.-backed warlord Rashid Dostum, a former Soviet
> collaborator turned jihadnik. Known for his macabre punishments -- he
> liked to see his victims torn apart by tanks -- Dostum fell upon the
> surrendered masses with his wonted fury. Thousands died on a death march
> through the mountains to Shebargan, where Dostum linked up with U.S.
> Special Forces. There, the captives, including the Tipton men, were packed
> by the hundreds into metal truck trailers, where they were left for days
> to suffocate and die. Fires were lit under some of the trailers, roasting
> those trapped inside. Of the 35,000 who left Kunduz, only 4,500 remained
> alive.
> 
> The survivors were crammed into Shebargan's open-air prison, where they
> continued to die in droves -- as U.S. forces watched coolly from the
> perimeter. Finally, the three friends were sent to an American camp in
> Kandahar, where, hooded and chained, they were "processed": stripped,
> rectally probed, beaten, forced to kneel for hours, naked, their necks
> pressed to the floor by a guard's boot. Then came the first
> "interrogation": again kneeling, chained, with beatings and kicking
> followed by questioning -- as an agent stood on the back of their legs,
> pressing a pistol to their heads. This routine went on for weeks. The only
> relief came when British spies appeared for a session: "Don't worry, they
> won't beat you while we're here," the jolly James Bonds would say. At
> night, there were head counts every hour to prevent the prisoners from
> sleeping.
> 
> One day, for reasons unexplained -- perhaps, as often happened, a false
> confession was beaten out of someone who gave names of "accomplices" to
> satisfy his interrogators -- the Tipton men were frog-marched onto a plane
> bound for Cuba, triple-chained and beaten along the way, beaten and kicked
> upon their arrival.
> 
> Then began the long, dazed limbo-life of Guantanamo. Endless
> interrogations: Each man was grilled at least 200 times, sometimes for 12
> hours at a stretch, always kneeling, chained to the floor. Constant
> punishments: for "back talk," or seeking privacy for their bowel
> movements, or arranging their utensils incorrectly. And always, over and
> over, the farcical accusations that could have easily been disproved with
> five minutes of investigation.
> 
> But their captors weren't interested in the truth; they wanted "results."
> Finally, after two years of relentless physical and psychological pressure
> -- including the ever-present threat of a military tribunal and execution
> without appeal -- the friends cracked and signed false confessions to the
> most ludicrous charge of all: that they were top bin Laden lieutenants,
> pictured with him in a video from August 2000, despite the existence of
> documentary evidence -- witnesses, pay stubs, school records -- that
> proved they were in England at the time. But before their show trial could
> begin, British intelligence belatedly examined the charge and confirmed
> the alibis of all three men.
> 
> Now they're free, as the Regime flushes the most embarrassing cases out of
> the system before the Supreme Court rules on the "legality" of the Bush
> gulag this summer. The treatment of these three innocent men, chained and
> beaten for two years, is not just a crime, but also -- like that other
> crime, the invasion of Iraq -- an enormous waste of time and resources in
> the "war on terrorism." We saw the grim fruit of this waste in Madrid last
> week.
> 
> But of course, the Pentagon Archipelago wasn't designed to fight
> terrorism; it's designed to advance terrorism -- state terrorism. Its
> purpose is to establish the principle of arbitrary rule -- in the name of
> "military necessity" -- above the rule of law, in America and around the
> world. It's part of an overarching system of terror -- aggressive war,
> assassination, indefinite detention, torture -- employed to achieve the
> Regime's openly stated ideological goal: "full-spectrum dominance" of
> global politics and resources, particularly energy resources. Al-Qaida has
> the same goal, and uses the same methods, albeit on a smaller,
> "asymmetrical" scale.
> 
> Now we are all at the mercy of these entwined terrorist factions -- both
> led by fundamentalist sons of two financially linked elitist clans. We
> will see more Guananamos, more Madrids, before this long, dark night is
> over.
> 
> Annotations
> 
> How We Survived Jail Hell
> The Observer, March 14, 2004
> 
> The Full Story of the Guantanamo Britons
> The Observer, March 14, 2004
> 
> Did the Saudis Buy a President?
> Salon.com, March 12, 2004
> 
> Even Death Row is Preferable to This
> The Observer, Feb. 22, 2004
> 
> My Hell in Camp X-Ray
> The Daily Mirror, March 12, 2004
> 
> This Creeping Sickness
> The Guardian, March 13, 2004
> 
> Five Are Free, But Bush Shows No Remorse
> Glasgow Sunday Herald, March 14, 2004
> 
> Pentagon Dismisses as 'Lies' Guantanamo Tales of Abuse
> Agence France Presse, March 15, 2004
> 
> The Empire Backfires
> The Nation, March 29, 2004 edition
> 
> The Getaway
> The New Yorker, Jan. 21, 2001
> 
> For Some Defendants, An American Gulag
> St. Petersburg Times, March 14, 2004
> 
> For More Years of Camp Bush?
> The Nation Institute, March 2004
> 
> The House of bin Laden
> The New Yorker, Nov. 12, 2001
> 
> Who is Osama bin Laden?
> Centre for Research on Globalization, Sept. 11, 2001
> 
> Bush's Death Squads
> Ratical.org, Jan. 31, 2002
> 
> Bush Has Widened Authority of CIA to Kill Terrorists
> New York Times, Dec. 15, 2002
> 
> Special Ops Get OK to Initiate Its Own Missions
> Washington Times, Jan. 8, 2003
> 
> The Enemy Within
> The Observer, Oct. 27, 2002
> 
> CIA Worked in Tandem With Pakistan to Create Taliban
> The Times of India, March 7, 2001
> 
> The Role of Pakistan's Military Intelligence in the Sept. 11 Attacks
> Centre for Research on Globalisation, Nov. 2, 2001
> 
> Spy Chief's Exit Due to Links With Terrorist
> Dawn (Pakistan), Oct. 9, 2001
> 
> The Search for Osama
> New Yorker, July 28, 2003
> 
> Terror in the Saudi Kingdom
> Salon.com, Aug. 1, 2003
> 
> General Ashcroft's Detention Camps
> Village Voice, Sept. 10, 2002
> 
> Blowback: Bin Laden Comes Home to Roost
> MSNBC.com, Aug. 24, 1998
> 
> FBI Claims Bin Laden Inquiry was Frustrated
> The Guardian, Nov. 7, 2001
> 
> M16 Halted Bid to Arrest bin Laden
> The Observer, Nov. 10, 2002
> 
> Knowing Much, Bush Did Little to Protect America
> Village Voice, March 16, 2002
> 
> Bin Laden Money Flow Leads to Midland, Texas
> In These Times, October 2001
> 
> Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President
> Glasgow Sunday Herald, Sept. 15, 2002
> 
> Rebuilding America's Defenses
> Project for a New Century, September 2000
> 
> Statement of Principles
> Project for a New American Century, June 3, 1997
> 
> National Security Strategy of the United States
> The White House, September 2002
> 
> Cheney Dirtied by Iraqi Oil
> 
> Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Sept. 5, 2002
> 
> Coward's War in Yemen
> Spiked, Nov. 11, 2002
> 
> Drones of Death
> The Guardian, Nov. 6, 2002
> 
> © 2004 Moscow Times
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
> 
>