[Peace-discuss] 100,000 Iraqi excess deaths?
Morton K.Brussel
brussel4 at insightbb.com
Thu Nov 4 23:01:09 CST 2004
[Below are extracts from an analysis of the studies on the number of
war related deaths of Iraqis, especially the latest one published by
Lancet. It comes from an article in ZNet by Stephen Soldz, a
sympathetic statistician. MKB]
…In interpreting this estimate [~100,000 deaths], the researchers, like
all good researchers, give an estimate of its precision. This is done
by providing what are known as 95% confidence intervals. These mean
that, 95% of the time, the true value is between the lower and upper
limits of the confidence interval (remember, these are estimates).
Given the nature of the study, the confidence intervals for this 98,000
estimate are broad, from 8,000 to 194,000. Thus, it is 95% likely that
the true rate of excess deaths is between 8,000 and 198,000.
From these results alone, it could be that the true value is nearer the
lower estimate of 8,000 than at the middle or upper end of this
interval. On this basis, one could conclude that the headlines about
100,000 excess deaths are unwarranted. But is that all there is to it?
Fred Kaplan in Slate seems to think so.[21] A closer examination of
this crucial issue is needed, however.
…
Conclusion
This study is an extremely well-conducted and analyzed piece of
research. Like most high-quality research, it has potential limitations
and the paper's Discussion section details possible interferences with
the accuracy of the results. The authors argue convincingly that none
of these limitations invalidate their basic findings of high excess
deaths following the invasion and occupation of Iraq. In fact, they
argue, based on arguments somewhat different from those I present here,
that the real number of excess deaths may be even higher than their
98,000 estimate.
So, have excess 100,000 Iraqis died since the invasion? I don't know
for sure. But this study convinces me that it is extremely likely that
many tens of thousands of Iraqis have died, far more than the Iraqi
Body Count estimate that I had previously relied upon. Noted Middle
East scholar Juan Cole came to a similar conclusion.[31]
We researchers never consider a single study to be the definitive word
on a topic. We always like to see a number of studies, using somewhat
different methodologies and carried out by researchers with different
biases. The authors clearly recognize this desirability and do not
present their study as the last word on Iraq mortality rates. (See the
excellent interview with one of the study authors from the New Republic
Online.[32]) Near the end of their paper they call for "confirmation by
an independent body such as the ICRC, Epicentre, or WHO" (p. 7). The
British-based NGO, Medact has endorsed the call for independent
investigations.[33] Medact further points out that this study only
examines Iraqi deaths and that "experience suggests that at least three
times as many people are injured as are killed in conflict." Thus, it
is likely that hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been wounded in the
last 18 months.
In the absence of this confirmation, this study remains the best
estimate of Iraq deaths. Its finding are truly horrifying. Recent
reports indicate that the US is placing a far greater reliance on air
power as a way of reducing Coalition casualties.[34] If this study's
findings are at all accurate, the result of these policies will be even
higher Iraqi civilian casualties. The continued US war in Iraq cannot
be justified on any conceivable humanitarian grounds when many tens of
thousands of Iraqis are being killed and many more injured. Surely,
this study should be a wake up call for all those, regardless of their
opinions about the original justifiability of the war, who sincerely
are concerned about the fate of the Iraqi people. The looming attacks
on Falluja and Ramadi suggest that, in the absence of world outrage
restraining this Coalition action, the death and injury toll will soon
be rising far higher.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 4463 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20041104/7d0ccfa5/attachment.bin
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list