[Peace-discuss] Iraqi children better off under Saddam Hussein

[C. G. Estabrook]

	Let them eat bombs
	The doubling of child malnutrition in Iraq is baffling
	Terry Jones
	Tuesday April 12, 2005
	The Guardian

A report to the UN human rights commission in Geneva has concluded that
Iraqi children were actually better off under Saddam Hussein than they are
now.

This, of course, comes as a bitter blow for all those of us who, like
George Bush and Tony Blair, honestly believe that children thrive best
when we drop bombs on them from a great height, destroy their cities and
blow up hospitals, schools and power stations.

It now appears that, far from improving the quality of life for Iraqi
youngsters, the US-led military assault on Iraq has inexplicably doubled
the number of children under five suffering from malnutrition. Under
Saddam, about 4% of children under five were going hungry, whereas by the
end of last year almost 8% were suffering.

These results are even more disheartening for those of us in the
Department of Making Things Better for Children in the Middle East By
Military Force, since the previous attempts by Britain and America to
improve the lot of Iraqi children also proved disappointing. For example,
the policy of applying the most draconian sanctions in living memory
totally failed to improve conditions. After they were imposed in 1990, the
number of children under five who died increased by a factor of six. By
1995 something like half a million Iraqi children were dead as a result of
our efforts to help them.

A year later, Madeleine Albright, then the US ambassador to the United
Nations, tried to put a brave face on it. When a TV interviewer remarked
that more children had died in Iraq through sanctions than were killed in
Hiroshima, Mrs Albright famously replied: "We think the price is worth
it."

But clearly George Bush didn't. So he hit on the idea of bombing them
instead. And not just bombing, but capturing and torturing their fathers,
humiliating their mothers, shooting at them from road blocks - but none of
it seems to do any good. Iraqi children simply refuse to be better
nourished, healthier and less inclined to die. It is truly baffling.

And this is why we at the department are appealing to you - the general
public - for ideas. If you can think of any other military techniques that
we have so far failed to apply to the children of Iraq, please let us know
as a matter of urgency. We assure you that, under our present leadership,
there is no limit to the amount of money we are prepared to invest in a
military solution to the problems of Iraqi children.

In the UK there may now be 3.6 million children living below the poverty
line, and 12.9 million in the US, with no prospect of either government
finding any cash to change that. But surely this is a price worth paying,
if it means that George Bush and Tony Blair can make any amount of money
available for bombs, shells and bullets to improve the lives of Iraqi
kids. You know it makes sense.

·Terry Jones is a film director, actor and Python. He is the author of
Terry Jones's War on the War on Terror