[Peace-discuss] RE: Forgiveness Weekend program schedule
Phil Stinard
pstinard at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 14 21:40:19 CST 2005
Carl,
Aaron Ammons gave an excellent interview on this week's IMC Radio News that
might answer some of your questions about Forgiveness Weekend. In a
nutshell, the felonies in questions are non-violent victimless crimes such
as drug possession. The main questions of disenfranchisement are in
employment and housing. Aaron raised the important point that forgiveness
is a two-way street--there also needs to be atonement by the felon and a
mending of the ways. Reverend Bevel and the other speakers are expected to
address issues of atonement as well.
I hadn't planned to attend the events, but after reading the exchanges in
the Peace-Discuss list, I definitely want to hear Reverend Bevel and the
others speak, and I encourage everyone reading this list to attend, too. I
know of Bevel's past associations, but I have an open mind, and I want to
hear what he has to say.
Clifford Thornton will also be holding a discussion this Sunday at 1 PM at
the IMC before his 3 PM keynote speech at Forgiveness Weekend and the 5 PM
AWARE meeting. If this schedule has changed, please correct me.
To Danielle, I say don't be discouraged. Although Carl has been harsh, he's
just one individual, and he doesn't represent AWARE as a whole on this
issue. Don't lose any more sleep or work time over it. He needs
forgiveness as much as the rest of us.
--Phil
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl wrote:
>The rather headlong nature of your post makes it difficult to answer,
>Danielle, and you indicate that you don't want to discuss the matter by
>e-mail anyway (and that you were not "able to face [me] at the meeting
>yesterday"...?)
>I don't believe I mentioned the matter at any meeting yesterday. What I
>did do was send you a question after the AWARE meeting: "What,
>specifically, is the disenfranchisement of felons that this conference
>seeks to end?" The question seemed quite straightforward to me.
>Randall offered what seemed to me to be an answer from a party with an
>interest in the matter, and we discussed it. But I now understand him to
>say that it was at best a partial or tentative indication of what an
>answer would be.
>You know that I agree that drug laws and resulting imprisonments are not
>accidental evils in our society, but instead malign mechanisms of social
>control that must be opposed politically. But I still don't know what,
>specifically, is the disenfranchisement of felons that your conference
>seeks to end.
>Regards, Carl
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Danielle Schumacher wrote:
>Thanks to Randall for all the time he put into defending Forgiveness
>Weekend. As Randall said, the organizers of the event are overwhelmed
>for several reasons. We have been putting as much information out
>about the CONFERENCE as possible, and while we know it does not
>contain as much information as we would like it to, we are doing what
>we can and we know that the event itself will contain most of the
>information you are looking for. We are actually overwhelmed wth
>support. For instance, I had to spend several days trying to arrange
>accomodations for people coming from out of town because there is a
>high school state wrestling championship that is taking all the hotel
>rooms. We weren't expecting so many people from out of town for the
>events, so we didn't have rooms reserved far enough ahead of time :)
>!!! The other thing that is overwhelming me personally is resistance
>and ATTACK from Carl. I hope this is not your intention, Carl, but
>you are keeping me up at night because I am incredibly upset that the
>group I thought I was a part of is now allowing you to work so
>actively against everything I am trying to do. And you don't even
>understand what I am trying to do! I supposed I could have tried to
>clear some of your questions up sooner, but does anyone in AWARE blaim
>me for not being able to face you at the meeting yesterday? And does
>anyone hold it against me that I feel it is a waste of time? Should I
>put time into trying to change your mind or should I be putting time
>into making the CONFERENCE better? I didn't answer all these emails
>last night, because I honestly couldn't believe they were happening,
>and now I am taking time from my new, wonderful job to answer this
>because I think it has gone way too far. And all through email! Why
>not on the phone? The Forgiveness Weekend press release has my phone
>number. Call and ask the questions, and I will answer if I can and
>talk to you when I have time. I chose to use email in this case so
>that everyone could see my response, since you chose to attack us in a
>public venue. And is Aaron even on the discuss list? Why would you
>attack him in a venue in which he cannot even defend himself? Please
>think about the situation you have put me in. If I choose to not
>spend this time to answer your questions, you will continue to assume
>things. If I choose to answer them, I am hoping I can calm your fears
>and I am taking time out of my work day, at which I get paid hourly
>and need every dollar because I am taking days off later in the week
>because Cliff Thornton will be my guest in town. Honestly, I feel
>tempted to ask you to pay me for time lost at work and sleep lost,
>etc.
>
>Now, rather than go through each email and respond to each concern, I
>have read through them as quickly as I could since I will tell my
>supervisor at the Y to not pay me for the hour this entire process
>will take me. I will respond with overall comments instead of
>nitpicky details. Thanks again to Randall for answering your
>questions, since that is what he did! Aaron's commentary should have
>answered what other forms of disenfranchisement we are referring to:
>the Higher Education Act Drug Provision denies financial aid to anyone
>with a drug conviction of any kind. public housing, government jobs,
>and other forms of public assistance are denied to felons.
>
>We are not just talking about Illinois. We are talking about all
>felons in the U.S. And we are mostly talking about felons whose only
>crime was drug POSSESSION and other NON-VIOLENT crimes. Carl, you
>keep referring to violent criminals. That is a different story, yet
>they are dealt with through the same criminal justice system so we
>must talk about them, too. They too need forgiveness.
>
>I am tempted to just tell you to give it a rest and just come to the
>events and ask your questions there. If you are not willing to do
>this sort of thing in public, only through email, then please refrain
>from doing it. I don't feel right about it, doing it through email. I
>would much prefer to work through all these issues in a public,
>personal way.
>
>As for the distinction between "rally" and "conference"- I seem to
>remember you volunteering at an AWARE table at the Amnesty conference
>I held on campus last year. Carol and Aaron obviously didn't have
>anything to do with the planning of that, but I think you will see the
>similarities between the two events. No one had anything bad to say
>about that event, so why is this one (which I feel is going to be 100
>times better) being attacked by so many people on so many levels? No
>one dug up dirt on the speakers at that conference before approving
>the AWARE money that supported it.
>
>As for the worth of Forgiveness Weekend... Carl, what are YOU doing to
>make the problem better? Since you have such a perfect understanding
>of the problem, why are we (Forgiveness Weekend organizers) the only
>ones trying to do anything about it? I'm sorry you feel that we are
>not doing enough, but at least we are trying to do something. And we
>don't even have any money to do it with!! I am confident that
>everything that is happening this Weekend is worth your time and at
>the very least will not be hurting society. Everything we all learn
>this weekend, all the discussions we will have, all the action we will
>take can only help.
>
>Carl, if you have any respect AT ALL for ANYONE, please stop these
>posts immediately.
>
>I look forward to seeing all of you this Weekend!
>
>Danielle
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list