[Peace-discuss] Friedman Wrong About Muslims Again
David Green
davegreen84 at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 17 20:47:10 CDT 2005
Informed Comment
Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion
Juan Cole is Professor of History at the University of
Michigan
Saturday, July 09, 2005
Friedman Wrong About Muslims Again
And the Amman Statement on Ecumenism
Tom Friedman is a Middle East expert who knows a lot
about Islam. Why,
then,
does he keep saying misleading things? He wrote in his
latest column,
"To this
day - to this day - no major Muslim cleric or
religious body has ever
issued
a fatwa condemning Osama bin Laden."
A "fatwa" is simply a considered opinion of a Muslim
jurisconsult. Such
opinions are numerous. First of all, almost all the
major Shiite Grand
Ayatollahs
have condemned Bin Laden and al-Qaeda. You could say
that is easy,
since
Shiites don't generally like Wahhabis. But they are
the leaders of 120
million
Muslims (some ten percent of the 1.2 billion). So that
is one. Tracking
these
things down is time-consuming, but this should do:
Ayatollah Muhammad Husain Fadlallah of Lebanon
condemns Osama Bin
Laden.
So then what about the Sunni world? The leading moral
authority for
Sunnis is
the rector or Grand Imam of the al-Azhar Seminary/
University in Cairo,
Egypt. Al-Azhar is perhaps the world's oldest
continuous university and
has been
since the time of Saladin a major center of Sunni
religious authority.
The
current incumbent is Shaikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi.
So what about
Tantawi and Bin
Laden?
Grand Imam of Al-Azhar seminary, Shaikh Muhammad
Sayyid Tantawi,
condemns
Osamah Bin Laden. And:
The Grand Imam of al-Azhar Seminary, Shaikh Muhammad
Sayyid Tantawi,
condemns
Osamah Bin Laden.
What about Pakistan? Admittedly, it has some clerics
who are fans of
Bin
Laden, or at least who would avoid condemning him. But
the allegation
Friedman is
making is that no major cleric has condemned him. Try
this: Prominent
Pakistani Cleric Tahir ul Qadri condemns Bin Laden.
I don't personally care for Yusuf al-Qaradawi. He is
an old-time
Egyptian
Muslim Brotherhood preacher who fled to Qatar and now
has a perch at
al-Jazeera.
But he does have some virtues. He is enormously
popular among Muslim
fundamentalists. And, he absolutely despises Bin Laden
and al-Qaeda.
Al-Qaradawi has
repeatedly condemned the latter. He even gave a fatwa
that it was a
duty of
Muslims to fight alongside the US in Afghanistan
against al-Qaeda! See
also:
Yusuf al-Qaradawi condemns al-Qaeda.
There are also substantial Muslim communities in
Europe with
leaderships that
have explicitly condemned Bin Laden. E.g.:
Spanish Muslim Clerical authorities Issue Fatwa
against Osamah Bin
Laden.
There are on the order of 250,000 Muslims in Spain.
High Mufti of Russian Muslims calls for Extradition of
Bin Laden. The
Russian
Muslim community is about 20 million strong, or 15
percent of Russia's
143
million population, and is growing rapidly, so that in
a century Russia
may be
50 percent Muslim. So this is not a pro forma thing
here.
A good round-up on this sort of issue has been put up
by al-Muhajabah.
See also Charles Kurzman's page.
Friedman also does refer to a major conference of
Muslim clerics,
thinkers
and notables wound up just Wednesday that made a
powerful statement
about
religious tolerance and condemned everything Osama Bin
Laden stands
for. But he
seems oddly unaware of the significance of having
Grand Ayatollah
Sistani, Grand
Imam of al-Azhar Seminary Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, and
many other great
Muslim
authorities sign off on this epochal statement of
Muslim ecumenism.
The statement forbids one Muslim to declare another
"not a Muslim" if
the
believer adheres to any of the mainstream legal rites
of Sunnism and
Shiism. The
whole basis of al-Qaeda is to call the Muslim leaders
of countries like
Egypt
and Saudi Arabia, as well as Shiites, "not Muslims."
The statement also
demands that engineers should please stop pretending
to issue fatwas,
which should
be left to trained clerical jurisconsults. This para.
is also a slam at
Bin
Laden.
PS As for Friedman's main point, that Muslims haven't
done a good job
of
fighting jihadi ideology and terrorism, it is bizarre.
The Algerian
government
fought a virtual civil war to put down political
Islam, in which over
100,000
persons died. The Egyptians jailed 20,000 or 30,000
radicals for
thought crimes
and killed 1500 in running street battles in the 1990s
and early
zeroes.
Al-Qaeda can't easily strike in the Middle East
precisely because
Syria, Egypt,
Algeria, etc. have their number and have undertaken
massive actions
against them.
What does Friedman want? And, besides, he is wrong
that this is only a
Muslim
problem. In the global age all problems are
everybody's. That's part of
flat
world, too, Tom.posted by Juan @ 7/09/2005 06:15:00 AM
http://www.juancole.com/2005/07/friedman-wrong-about-muslims-again-and.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list