[Peace-discuss] Obama too shifty for McCain

[John W.]

At 10:49 PM 2/6/2006, C. G. Estabrook wrote:

>Yeah, it's a verbal attack from a man who came of age killing
>Asian farmers from an airplane (and they refrained from
>killing him, when they had the chance).

I take that to mean that you have no respect for McCain, and don't allow 
for the possibility of change and growth?  And that torture is somehow more 
morally acceptable than killing?


>And maybe the Bush administration aren't the only ones into
>data-mining ... but whenever documents surface, the first
>question to ask is cui bono.  --CGE

All right, I'm game.  Cui bono in this case?  I'm afraid it's a bit too 
complex for me, as a great many things are.

John again




>---- Original message ----
> >Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:35:14 -0600
> >From: "John W." <jbw292002 at gmail.com>
> >Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Obama too shifty for McCain
> >To: "C. G. Estabrook" <mailto:galliher at uiuc.edu>galliher at uiuc.edu, 
> <mailto:peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> >
> >At 08:02 PM 2/6/2006, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
> >
> >>[This is cute. McCain is a fathead who likes to be taken for a
> >>liberal, but was last week in Munich raving for an attack on
> >>Iran.  (He said, "There's only one thing worse than military
> >>action; that is a nuclear-armed Iran" -- as Obama said last
> >>year.) But here Obama, who always likes to be on both sides of
> >>an issue (witness his antics about Alito), is too shifty even
> >>for McCain.  --CGE]
> >
> >This looks for all the world, Carl, like a private missive from McCain to
> >Obama.  I'm curious how you came by it.  Having read the letter in its
> >entirety, it appears to me that McCain got in the last word in a very
> >incisive manner.  Am I wrong?
> >
> >John Wason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20060206/8ad21a84/attachment.htm