[Peace-discuss] Those cartoons of the Prophet
Morton K. Brussel
brussel4 at insightbb.com
Tue Feb 7 18:44:33 CST 2006
A reasoned argument.
ZNet | Race
Punishing Denmark
Taking on the Wrong Enemy
by Ramzy Baroud; February 05, 2006
Only an irresponsible and intellectually inept individual would
sketch such insulting images as those depicting Prophet Mohamed by a
cartoonist in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper. And no self-
respecting newspaper would allow itself to run such filth. However,
the backlash in the Muslim world highlights a much more serious issue.
Jyllands-Posten - and another newspaper in Norway that re-ran the
offensive cartoons - is obviously neither self-respecting nor
serious. What good will it do to depict a prophet revered by hundreds
of millions all around the globe as a terrorist, carrying a bomb
under his turban? Nothing at all. What it will do though, is
intensify and cement the feelings of bitterness and humiliation
experienced by millions of Muslims as they endure the wrath of US-led
Western wars, with all of their tragedies and endless bloodshed.
Not even the handy excuse of freedom of the press is so reasonable a
defense to the mockery. Such freedom should not be the kind of
versatile pretext unleashed only to widen the divide between the West
and the Muslim world. Moreover, why not admit that in most Western
societies, there are many unquestionable values, ancient and recent,
that are taboo, which few dare to approach, the Holocaust being one
of them.
But it's not the Western media's inconsistencies that I wish to focus
on here. What I wish to examine are the inconsistencies of the Arab
and Muslim collective response to aggression, tangible or otherwise.
The anti-Danish movement managed to build up across Muslim countries
at such an impressive speed: grassroots collective action and
decisive political moves led by various governments -- with Libya and
Saudi Arabia on the helm -- quickly turned into determined diplomatic
efforts. Arab League missions in Denmark and across Europe united in
one of the most coordinated campaigns organized by Arabs since the
1973 War, heaping even more pressure on both Denmark and Norway.
Meanwhile, a serious economic boycott campaign is rapidly translating
into empty shelves in grocery stores that once offered Danish
products across Saudi Arabia and other countries.
The Danish prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, although he didn't
apologize personally, commended Jyllands-Posten for offering a clear
apology for offending Muslims and Muslim nations for its editorial
decision to publish the cartoons. But that would not suffice in the
face of the gathering storm, as Arab League representatives are
surely taking the matter to the United Nations, with the hope of
passing a UN resolution, backed by sanctions that would protect
religion from insults, according to the BBC.
While one must commend such a unified Arab and Muslim stance --
hoping that it would remain confined to legitimate forms of protest
-- one cannot help but wonder where was such collectiveness when it
was needed the most?
This is not to suggest that transgression on a people's beliefs --
any people and any belief -- should be taken lightly. However, if
Arabs can be so efficient in organizing such popular (and effective)
campaigns that utilize economic, political and diplomatic leverage to
extract concessions, then why the utter failure to carry out such
campaigns protesting against the US war on Iraq, its unconditional
support of Israel and its condescending foreign policy and grand
democracy charades it wishes to impose on everyone?
Isn't it rather strange that cheap Israeli products are penetrating
Arab markets from Morocco to Qatar in the most blatant of ways,
despite the fact that Israel occupies land belonging to three Arab
nations?
Isn't it peculiar that Muslim countries are shrewdly paving their way
towards normalization with Israel -- some overtly like Pakistan,
others sneakily like Malaysia -- despite the fact that Israel
unabashedly moves forward with its policy of targeted assassination,
killing hundreds of Palestinians?
And how belligerent could the Danish media be if compared to its
counterparts in the United States and Britain? Nonetheless, is there
one Arab household that lacks access to CNN, HBO and Fox?
It's rather ironic that many in the Arabic media discovered by total
chance that 530 Danish soldiers are taking part in the illegitimate
US war on Iraq, by way of the Danish newspaper controversy. Thus, it
cannot even be claimed that popular response to the insulting comics
was the culmination of years of resentment harbored towards Danish
foreign policy, whether in Iraq or towards any other Arab or Muslim
related issue.
This is neither an attempt to defend Denmark (or Norway) or its
apparently selective "freedom of the press", but to highlight the
misconstrued priorities inundating the Arab world today. During a
decade of US-led UN sanctions in Iraq, neighboring Muslim and Arab
countries were commended by the US, saying that their cooperation was
vital to the success of the sanctions imposed on the stricken nation.
According to the most modest and outdated UN reports, over 500,000
Iraqi children died as a result of the lack of medicine. Where was
the popular uproar then, the diplomatic fury and the boycott campaign?
I am afraid that the Muslim and Arab-led anti- Danish campaign will
widen a chasm separating both worlds, bolstering the Arabs'
reputation of being intolerant while providing an unimportant
cartoonist with the opportunity of a lifetime: a chance for martyrdom
on behalf of freedom of the press and perhaps a book deal, and if
lucky, a spot on the Oprah Winfrey show. But that's all that one
should expect.
Prophet Mohamed is revered because of his daily-felt contribution to
Muslim life everywhere. He needs not a Danish cartoonist to validate
or nullify his relevance in the lives of millions. Of that Muslims
are to be sure. However, it is discouraging that the collective
energy of the Muslim world is consumed punishing a small European
country over a drawing, while US military bases infest the heart of
the Arab world, and American fast food restaurants crowd every street
corner, from the Atlantic Ocean to the Arabian Gulf, while few seem
to notice or even care.
-Ramzy Baroud is a veteran Arab-American journalist and the editor in
chief of the Palestine Chronicle. He currently teaches mass
communication at Australia’s Curtin University of Technology,
Malaysia Campus. He is the author of the forthcoming book Writings on
the Second Palestinian Uprising: A Chronicle of a People’s Struggle
(Pluto Press, London).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20060207/aa043754/attachment.htm
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list