[Peace-discuss] Fwd: Message from Senator Barack Obama
Morton K. Brussel
mkb4 at mac.com
Wed Jul 5 14:22:09 CDT 2006
FYI. There are two sides to the story, he says, so we shouldn't
censure, or --god forbid-impeach the president. --mkb
Begin forwarded message:
> From: senator_obama at obama.senate.gov
> Date: July 5, 2006 11:59:03 AM CDT
> To: mkb4 at mac.com
> Subject: Message from Senator Barack Obama
>
> Dear Morton:
>
> Thank you for writing about Senator Russ Feingold's proposal to
> censure President Bush. I understand your strong feelings on this
> issue. While I share your frustration and anger, I do not think
> censure is justified at this time.
>
> I agree with Senator Feingold that the Administration's attitude
> toward congressional oversight and the FISA law has been cavalier
> and arrogant. We are a nation of laws, and those laws should be
> applied to all of us, from humblest citizen to the president of the
> United States. No president should be allowed to knowingly and
> willing flout our laws, and I believe the President exceeded his
> authority with his domestic wiretapping program. The justifications
> offered – that the president possesses inherent presidential
> authority under Article II, or was granted that authority in the
> 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force -- seem to contradict
> prior precedent and our constitutional design.
>
> But my and Senator Feingold’s view is not unanimous. Some
> constitutional scholars and lower court opinions support the
> president’s argument that he has inherent authority to go outside
> the bounds of the law in monitoring the activities of suspected
> terrorists. The question is whether the president understood the
> law and knowingly flaunted it, or whether he and his aides, in good
> faith, interpreted their authority more broadly than I and others
> believe the law allows. Ultimately, this debate must be resolved by
> the courts.
>
> Also, a censure resolution does nothing to deal with the underlying
> problem of unchecked executive power. It would not force the
> president to modify his domestic surveillance program or force the
> Senate Intelligence Committee to do its job. In order to do that,
> Congress must reassert its constitutional role in overseeing the
> domestic surveillance program. And it should bring the warrantless
> wiretapping program back under the authority of the court
> established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
> Therefore, my focus is on crafting an effective surveillance
> program that both combats terrorism and contains meaningful
> judicial review of wiretapping, which is the most effective way to
> restore balance between the battle against terrorism and the rule
> of law.
>
> Finally, I can assure you that your opinion is important to me, and
> I hope my opinion is important to you. I will continue to try to
> bring my best judgment to the issues before the Senate, and let the
> people of Illinois make their best judgment on my service to the
> state.
>
> Again, thank you for writing. I will closely follow the hearing on
> Senator Feingold’s bill taking place in the Judiciary Committee
> this week to see if any further information surfaces that might
> impact my decision.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Barack Obama
> United States Senator
>
>
> P.S. Our system does not allow direct response to this email.
> However, if you would like to contact me again, please use the form
> on the website: http://obama.senate.gov/contact/
>
> Stay up to date with Barack's work in the Senate and on issues of
> importance to Illinois. Subscribe to the weekly podcast here:
> http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20060705/494f6976/attachment.htm
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list