[Peace-discuss] Fwd: U.S. Seeks Silence on CIA Prisons
Morton K. Brussel
brussel at uiuc.edu
Sat Nov 4 21:47:32 CST 2006
If this doesn't send a chill of horror down your spine, an fright at
at the drift in this country as it swings towards totalitarianism,
what will? Kafkaesque. --mkb
> U.S. Seeks Silence on CIA Prisons
> Court Is Asked to Bar Detainees From Talking About Interrogations
>
> By Carol D. Leonnig and Eric Rich
> Washington Post Staff Writers
> Saturday, November 4, 2006; A01
>
>
> The Bush administration has told a federal judge that terrorism
> suspects held in secret CIA prisons should not be allowed to reveal
> details of the "alternative interrogation methods" that their
> captors used to get them to talk.
>
> The government says in new court filings that those interrogation
> methods are now among the nation's most sensitive national security
> secrets and that their release -- even to the detainees' own
> attorneys -- "could reasonably be expected to cause extremely grave
> damage." Terrorists could use the information to train in counter-
> interrogation techniques and foil government efforts to elicit
> information about their methods and plots, according to government
> documents submitted to U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton on Oct.
> 26.
>
> The battle over legal rights for terrorism suspects detained for
> years in CIA prisons centers on Majid Khan, a 26-year-old former
> Catonsville resident who was one of 14 high-value detainees
> transferred in September from the "black" sites to the U.S.
> military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. A lawyer with the Center
> for Constitutional Rights, which represents many detainees at
> Guantanamo, is seeking emergency access to him.
>
> The government, in trying to block lawyers' access to the 14
> detainees, effectively asserts that the detainees' experiences are
> a secret that should never be shared with the public.
>
> Because Khan "was detained by CIA in this program, he may have come
> into possession of information, including locations of detention,
> conditions of detention, and alternative interrogation techniques
> that is classified at the TOP SECRET//SCI level," an affidavit from
> CIA Information Review Officer Marilyn A. Dorn states, using the
> acronym for "sensitive compartmented information."
>
> Gitanjali Gutierrez, an attorney for Khan's family, responded in a
> court document yesterday that there is no evidence that Khan had
> top-secret information. "Rather," she said, "the executive is
> attempting to misuse its classification authority . . . to conceal
> illegal or embarrassing executive conduct."
>
> Joseph Margulies, a Northwestern University law professor who has
> represented several detainees at Guantanamo, said the prisoners
> "can't even say what our government did to these guys to elicit the
> statements that are the basis for them being held. Kafka-esque
> doesn't do it justice. This is 'Alice in Wonderland.' "
>
> Kathleen Blomquist, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said
> yesterday that details of the CIA program must be protected from
> disclosure. She said the lawyer's proposal for talking with Khan
> "is inadequate to protect unique and potentially highly classified
> information that is vital to our country's ability to fight
> terrorism."
>
> Government lawyers also argue in court papers that detainees such
> as Khan previously held in CIA sites have no automatic right to
> speak to lawyers because the new Military Commissions Act, signed
> by President Bush last month, stripped them of access to U.S.
> courts. That law established separate military trials for terrorism
> suspects.
>
> The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is
> considering whether Guantanamo detainees have the right to
> challenge their imprisonment in U.S. courts. The government urged
> Walton to defer any decision on access to lawyers until the higher
> court rules.
>
> The government filing expresses concern that detainee attorneys
> will provide their clients with information about the outside world
> and relay information about detainees to others. In an affidavit,
> Guantanamo's staff judge advocate, Cmdr. Patrick M. McCarthy, said
> that in one case a detainee's attorney took questions from a BBC
> reporter with him into a meeting with a detainee at the camp. Such
> indirect interviews are "inconsistent with the purpose of counsel
> access" at the prison, McCarthy wrote.
>
> Dorn said in the court papers that for lawyers to speak to former
> CIA detainees under the security protocol used for other Guantanamo
> detainees "poses an unacceptable risk of disclosure." But detainee
> attorneys said they have followed the protocol to the letter, and
> none has been accused of releasing information without government
> clearance.
>
> Captives who have spent time in the secret prisons, and their
> advocates, have said the detainees were sometimes treated harshly
> with techniques that included "waterboarding," which simulates
> drowning. Bush has declared that the administration will not
> tolerate the use of torture but has pressed to retain the use of
> unspecified "alternative" interrogation methods.
>
> The government argues that once rules are set for the new military
> commissions, the high-value detainees will have military lawyers
> and "unprecedented" rights to challenge charges against them in
> that venue.
>
> U.S. officials say Khan, a Pakistani national who lived in the
> United States for seven years, took orders from Khalid Sheik
> Mohammed, the man accused of orchestrating the Sept. 11, 2001,
> attacks. Mohammed allegedly asked Khan to research poisoning U.S.
> reservoirs and considered him for an operation to assassinate the
> Pakistani president.
>
> In a separate court document filed last night, Khan's attorneys
> offered declarations from Khaled al-Masri, a released detainee who
> said he was held with Khan in a dingy CIA prison called "the salt
> pit" in Afghanistan. There, prisoners slept on the floor, wore
> diapers and were given tainted water that made them vomit, Masri
> said. American interrogators treated him roughly, he said, and told
> him he "was in a land where there were no laws."
>
> Khan's family did not learn of his whereabouts until Bush announced
> his transfer in September, more than three years after he was
> seized in Pakistan.
>
> The family said Khan was staying with a brother in Karachi,
> Pakistan, in March 2003 when men, who were not in uniform, burst
> into the apartment late one night and put hoods over the heads of
> Khan, his brother Mohammad and his brother's wife. The couple's 1-
> month-old son was also seized.
>
> Another brother, Mahmood Khan, who has lived in the United States
> since 1989, said in an interview this week that the four were
> hustled into police vehicles and taken to an undisclosed location,
> where they were separated and held in windowless rooms. His sister-
> in-law and her baby remained together, he said.
>
> According to Mahmood, Mohammad said they were questioned repeatedly
> by men who identified themselves as members of Pakistan's
> intelligence service and others who identified themselves as U.S.
> officials. Mohammad's wife was released after seven days, and he
> was released after three months, without charge. He was left on a
> street corner without explanation, Mahmood said.
>
> Periodically, he said, people who identified themselves as
> Pakistani officials contacted Mohammad and assured him that his
> brother would soon be released and that they ought not contact a
> lawyer or speak with the news media.
>
> "We had no way of knowing who had him or where he was," Mahmood
> Khan said this week at the family home outside Baltimore. He said
> they complied with the requests because they believed anything else
> could delay his brother's release.
>
> In Maryland, Khan's family was under constant FBI surveillance from
> the moment of his arrest, his brother said. The FBI raided their
> house the day after the arrest , removing computer equipment,
> papers and videos. Each family member was questioned extensively
> and shown photographs of terrorism suspects that Mahmood Khan said
> none of them recognized. For much of the next year, he said, they
> were followed everywhere.
>
> "Pretty much we were scared," he said. "We live in this country. We
> have everything here."
>
> Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
>
> -Original is at:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20061104/5dbcb7ca/attachment.html
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list