[Peace-discuss] *Soldiers in Revolt*

[Jan & Durl Kruse]

Soldiers in Revolt: 218 active-duty troops call to end the U.S. 
occupation of Iraq

Christian Avard
Published: Wednesday October 25, 2006
For the first time since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, active-duty members 
of the military are publicly appealing members of Congress to end the 
U.S. occupation, RAW STORY has learned.

Under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act (DOD directive 7050.6), 
active-duty military, National Guard, and Reservists can send a 
protected communication to a member of Congress regarding any subject 
without reprisal.

Earlier this week, 65 military service members and National Guardsmen 
sent appeals for redress to members of Congress to urge an immediate 
withdrawal from Iraq. That total is now up to 219 service men and 
women, 125 of whom are on active duty.

Three active-duty servicemen (one of whom spoke under condition of 
anonymity) held a press conference today, along with a retired Judge 
Advocate General lawyer, to discuss their appeals.

"Many of us--who have to follow orders and took an oath to defend the 
constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic--[also] have 
reservations about the orders. And," Jonathan Hutto, a Navy Seaman 
based in Norfolk, Virginia, concluded, "at this point some of us feel 
compelled to let our reservations be known and that the occupation 
should come to an end right now."

Hutto added the group are not pacifists or conscientious objectors and 
are not urging any actions that might be deemed illegal.

The grievances

Liam Madden, a Sergeant in the United States Marine Corps stationed at 
Quantico, continued, "The real grievances are, if democracy is our goal 
than I believe we are going about it all wrong. The occupation is 
perpetuating more violence and I think is the biggest destabilizing 
thing we can do to the Middle East."

One service member, who spoke on the condition of anonymity of his 
recent year in Iraq, said that he, "was hit by IEDs, by mortars... I 
was hit by snipers in my convoy and I’ve seen friends injured and 
affected by deaths in my brigade and my unit. I can tell you that many 
of them are not quite sure what their purpose or focus is now."

"A lot of people don’t want to admit it," he insisted, "but we are 
stuck in a civil war and it’s hard for the soldiers seeing the ethnic 
fighting going on around them and feeling like they’re stuck in the 
cross fire and not really feeling like there’s anything they can do to 
stop it."

"And it’s very frustrating to go out in convoys and get hit and not 
really sure why it is and not seeing any tangible results for their 
actions," he added. "I think it’s very important that Congress members 
and people understand that we do have a voice, and pay attention to our 
surroundings and what’s going on--and listen to what we have to say."

Appealing for redress

Hutto explained that the idea of issuing Appeals for Redress originated 
in early 2006, when he was deployed off the coast of Iraq on the U.S.S. 
Theodore Roosevelt.

"An old buddy of mine, who was a member of the GI movement back in the 
early 1970s," Hutto explained, "sent me a 30th anniversary copy of 
Soldiers in Revolt, written by David Cortwright. The book chronicles 
the GI movement within the military during the Vietnam War who 
advocated to end that war and bring the troops home."

Hutto continued, "One of the avenues that they used, which was a legal 
one, is appealing to their political leaders in Washington. By 1971 
over 250,000 of these active duty servicemen had appealed to the 
Congress people."

"None of the Marines know that there is a policy available to them," 
Madden added, "and that it’s everybody’s duty to support democracy and 
do it much more effectively than we are in exercising these rights in 
Iraq."

J.E. McNeil, a former military JAG lawyer, emphasized that all 
servicemen and women still have their rights as U.S. citizens and can 
exercise them when need be.

"When men and women join the military and put on the uniform, they 
don’t give up their rights as U.S. citizens," said McNeil, though 
"there may be some small limitations to their first amendment rights."

"They are supposed to be very clear," McNeil elaborated, "and they have 
been, that they’re speaking on their own behalf and not using any of 
the military resources to make these statements that are their own 
beliefs, and we should be very proud of them to do that."

Fear of reprisal

Many in the military fear reprisals for coming forth, even though they 
have the legal right to do so.

One soldier in the Army, who participated anonymously in the press 
conference had more information to reveal, saying, "Anyone who’s been 
involved in the military does know there are informal means of punitive 
actions that circumvent the legal system which are often used in 
different means to intimidate soldiers."

"I’ve talked to numerous soldiers," the anonymous soldier said, "and 
obviously looking at the numbers now, they obviously haven’t stepped 
forward. I will tell you, though--and I don’t think the American Public 
realizes--just how many soldiers and service members in general really 
do have reservations about the actions going on in Iraq.

"And fear," he added, is a main reason why people aren’t stepping 
forward.... I think that once they start seeing momentum going forward 
and more and more service members come out, that they will be more 
inclined to come out as well."

"It’s costing way too many humans, Iraqi civilians, and American 
service member lives," Madden concluded, "and brings us no benefits. 
The only people who benefit in my eyes are corporations like 
Halliburton. I don’t think that war is being paid for in the right 
manner and I think that if people want to support the troops then they 
should support us coming home."

#Appeal for Redress may be contacted via their website at 
Appealforredress.org.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 6563 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20061025/bc5e790b/attachment.bin