[Peace-discuss] Re: Congo and Darfur: the Inconsistent U.S. Position

Wed Jul 18 15:04:00 CDT 2007

Thank you for this article, Carl. The United States' absolutely abysmal policy towards the DRC is telling of the administration's morally misguided foreign policy with regards to the African continent.

Vist AIUSA's DRC page for some good background on the human rights violations taking place there...

http://www.amnestyusa.org/By_Country/Congo_Dem_Rep_of/page.do?id=1011136&n1=3&n2=30&n3=886
best,
scott

> Message: 5> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:55:36 -0500> From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu>> Subject: [Peace-discuss] Congo and Darfur: the Inconsistent U.S.> Position> To: Peace Discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>> Message-ID: <469D9D48.50206 at uiuc.edu>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed> > As many as five million people have died in the Democratic Republic of > Congo. A quarter million or so have perished in Darfur, western Sudan. > Both are abominations, genocides, crimes against humanity, but only > Darfur rates coverage in the U.S. corporate media, action by the United > States on the diplomatic and military front, or concerted interest by > the Congressional Black Caucus. The Congolese genocide, triggered > directly by the U.S. and its surrogates, is masked in silence. In > Darfur, "Arabs" who are indistinguishable from their Black African > Muslim neighbors are demonized as enemies in the "clash of civilizations."> > A Tale of Two Genocides, Congo and Darfur:> The Blatantly Inconsistent U.S. Position> by BAR executive editor Glen Ford> > "A human death toll that approaches the Nazi's annihilation of Jews in > World War Two unfolds without a whiff of complaint from the superpower."> > Possibly a quarter million people have lost their lives in Darfur, > western Sudan, in ethnic conflict. The U.S. government screams its head > off in denunciation of genocide, in this case. In the Democratic > Republic of Congo (DRC), as many as five million have died since 1994 in > overlapping convulsions of ethnic and state-sponsored massacre. Not a > word of reproach from Washington. A human death toll that approaches the > Nazi's annihilation of Jews in World War Two -- an ongoing holocaust -- > unfolds without a whiff of complaint from the superpower.> > Why is mass death the cause of indignation and confrontation in Sudan, > but exponentially more massive carnage in Congo unworthy of mention? The > answer is simple: in Sudan, the U.S. has a geopolitical nemesis to > confront: Arabs, and their Chinese business partners. In the Congo, it > is U.S allies and European and American corporate interests that benefit > from the slaughter. Therefore, despite five million skeletons lying in > the ground, there is no call to arms from the American government. It is > they who set the genocidal Congolese machine in motion.> > Active U.S. Passivity> > In 1994, Rwanda was on the brink. The Hutu majority, which had for a > century been oppressed by Tutsi surrogates for European colonialists, > feared that another massacre of their kin was imminent. There had been > many massacres of Hutus, before, in Rwanda and neighboring Burundi, also > under minority Tutsi control. Pent-up hysteria exploded in an orgy of > violence that claimed the lives of as many as 800,000 Tutsis and Hutus > that did not support the genocide.> > The U.S. did nothing to interfere, because they had two actors in the > game. Ugandan dictator Yoweri Museveni was now the Americans' guy in > central Africa. Tutsi Rwandan exiles, headed by Paul Kagame, were an > integral part of Museveni's army. As the genocide began, Kagame's forces > launched an offensive from Uganda into Rwanda. It did not halt the > massacre of Tutsis, but succeeded in driving the disorganized Hutus into > neighboring Congo. The Americans now had another player in the African > game: the new head of the Rwandan Tutsi-dominated state, Paul Kagame. > His forces then invaded eastern Congo, chasing the fleeing Hutus.> > "The eastern Congo was up for grabs, and everybody grabbed some."> > All hell broke loose. President Mobutu Sese Seko, America's man in the > Congo, then called Zaire, was terminally ill. He fled and died in exile > in 1997. The eastern Congo was now up for grabs, and everybody grabbed > some. Eastern Congo is one of the most minerally rich places on Earth, > an extractors' paradise. According to the CIA's "Factbook," the DRC > abounds with "cobalt, copper, niobium, tantalum, petroleum, industrial > and gem diamonds, gold, silver, zinc, manganese, tin, uranium, coal, > hydropower, timber." All of these resources are exploited by European > and American corporations that maintain their own mercenary armies to > guard the extraction fields. For generations they have run their patches > of Congolese land like governments, with the support of France, Belgium, > the United States and other powers. The so-called civil war effectively > gave them full autonomy in the wake of Mobutu's corrupt demise, as the > power of the central government in Kinshasa crumbled. Mass carnage raged > around them, but did not interrupt the extraction process.> > Geopolitical Crimes> > In the thirteen years since Rwandan Tutsi Paul Kagame's forces -- > surrogates for the U.S. puppet president of Uganda, Yoweri Museveni -- > invaded the eastern Congo, possibly five million people have died. > President Bill Clinton, the man who stood aside while the Rwandan > genocide took place, then presided over a far bigger mass murder in > Congo. He has apologized for only one. In a visit to Kigali, capital of > Rwanda, Clinton said:> > "We come here today partly in recognition of the fact that we in the > United States and the world community did not do as much as we could > have and should have done to try to limit what occurred."> > But what occurred is not over. The bloodshed spread rapidly to eastern > Congo, unleashed by U.S. surrogate forces, and continues to this day. > Paul Kagame, the Rwandan president, has served U.S. imperial ambitions > well. He supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and continues to > destabilize Congo with his forces in the eastern region. Multinational > corporations, of course, operate their own airstrips and communications > networks. Their patches of Congo proceed like business as usual, while > the death toll mounts by millions among the people, who are overrun by > militias of various ethnicities and Kagame's Rwandan army.> > "A quarter million people have died in Darfur,> compared to five million in Congo."> > The Congolese genocide is not part of the American political discussion. > When Africa is mentioned at all, it is about Darfur. A quarter million > people have died there, compared to five million in Congo. Both > holocausts are crimes against humanity, but only the smaller one, > Darfur, is a fit subject for inclusion in the U.S. political debate. > During the June 3 CNN Democratic debate, moderator Wolf Blitzer demanded > that the candidates "raise their hands" if they supported the imposition > of a no-fly zone in Darfur -- an act of war against the government in > Khartoum according to international law. Only Rep. Dennis Kucinich and > former Senator Mike Gravel declined to endorse the violation of Sudanese > sovereignty. In the following Republican debate, the consensus was > almost unanimous, except for Rep. Ron Paul: impose a no-fly regime over > the western Sudan.> > Imperial Chess Game> > The Congressional Black Caucus follows the same script as Wolf Blitzer. > Members have lobbied and demonstrated against the Sudanese regime, to > the applause of the corporate press. But they have never said a word, as > a body, about the hellacious carnage in Congo. It is a taboo subject, > too close to "vital American interests." But the Sudanese conflict is > fair game, and so the Black Caucus joins in the general mob attack. They > make common cause with imperial ambitions in the Horn of Africa, while > ignoring the murder of millions in central Africa.> > "The Black Caucus makes common cause with> imperial ambitions in the Horn of Africa."> > The preferred narrative of Darfur fits nicely with that of the Israeli > lobby in the United States. Although all the antagonists are Black > Africans and Muslims, the aggressors are classified as "Arabs." A > regional inter-African, inter-Muslim conflict is made to appear as part > of the "clash of civilizations" -- the new Cold War. The proof is that > the Chinese are partners with the Khartoum regime, having engaged in oil > contracts. The evil Chinese menace threatens American interests, and it > follows that any country that deals with the Chinese is involved in an > anti-American conspiracy. If they are Arabs (although black as my shoe), > then the narrative is complete. Arabs have collaborated with Chinese to > kill Africans just as black as themselves. Let's declare war on them, > beginning with a no-fly zone that violates their sovereignty.> > The scenario is the same as Iraq: take control of their skies and the > land beneath it, and bomb at will. Remove any semblance of government > authority, under the guise of ending genocide. Extend the reach of the > U.S. military's paws in the Sahel region. The African Union has tried > mightily to put an effective peace-keeping force on the ground in > Darfur, but the United States and the Europeans refused to supply the > logistical forces that are necessary; the C-130s to reinforce and supply > the African troops. The Americans and Europeans held out until the > African contingent was at the breaking point, and then forced through > the UN Security Council a plan to place 26,000 U.S. and European-led > soldiers on the ground. Another piece of Africa will pass into foreign > hands.> > Darfur has been made into a stage-set of anti-Arab conflict, which > perfectly suits the pro-Israel lobby in the U.S. Congo, where far more > people have died, remains a gargantuan killing field, uncovered by the > corporate media and ignored by the Congressional Black Caucus and the > array of Democratic presidential candidates. Genocide depends on who is > doing the killing, apparently.> > Glen Ford is executive editor of Black Agenda Report. He can be > contacted at Glen.Ford at BlackAgendaReport.com> > ###> > > ------------------------------> > _______________________________________________> Peace-discuss mailing list> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss> > > End of Peace-discuss Digest, Vol 42, Issue 68> *********************************************
_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best web mail—award-winning Windows Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HMWL_mini_pcmag_0707
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20070718/a5f9b766/attachment-0001.html