[Peace-discuss] Brian Chesley's case

Brian Dolinar briandolinar at gmail.com
Wed Apr 30 07:12:26 CDT 2008


Julia did not enter BC's police reports into discovery until June 12, 2007.
The incident occurred March 30.
Why did it take 10 weeks to produce the reports?
What does Rietz have to hide?
The public and the press used to be able to read these police reports
but in Jan 2006 Rietz no longer allowed it.
Now we have to FOIA the docs after the case is over - which should be May 9.

And still the police can't get their story straight as to what happened
March 30.

BD


On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:27 AM, LAURIE <LAURIE at advancenet.net> wrote:

>  Yes, but did you ask her the conditions under which the offer was made.
> Evidently there is some question regarding what information was made
> available to him and his lawyer, which the state had in its possession and
> which may have been relevant to any decision concerning the acceptance of
> the diversion offer.  It should also be noted that the offer of diversion
> does presume quilt; but guilt of what that would warrant prosecution?
>   Given the fact that the Park authority had a program operating in the park
> which did not close  down leaving enough time for participants to leave the
> program and get out of the park, and in light of the fact that there was no
> serious crime committed or even suspected, why even take any action rather
> than just dropping the charges.
>
>
>
> Would Reitz be willing to give a full and complete public explanation of
> her offices behavior and be willing to be open to public questioning?  I
> think that the members of the SA's office may be hiding behind tacit
> presumptions that police typically are correct in their actions and should
> be taken at their word or have good legitimate practical reasons for their
> actions and that it is ok to hide behind the excuse of not revealing "work
> product."   Thus, so as not to alienate those whom they have to work with on
> a daily basis, there is an inclination to support them unless there has been
> an obvious and flagrant major impropriatey.
>
>
>
> *From:* Shirley Stillinger [mailto:shirley.stillinger at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:46 PM
> *To:* LAURIE
> *Cc:* Robert Naiman; peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] Brian Chesley's case
>
>
>
> Julia Reitz, State's Attorney, has told me that Mr. Chesley was offered
> diversion and, at the advice of his attorney, turned it down.  I have asked
> her if I can send her message to this list.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Note new email address: shirley.stillinger at gmail.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>


-- 
Brian Dolinar, Ph.D.
303 W. Locust St.
Urbana, IL 61801
briandolinar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20080430/f19c2c03/attachment.html


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list