[Peace-discuss] Not voting

n.dahlheim at mchsi.com n.dahlheim at mchsi.com
Mon Jan 28 17:26:34 CST 2008


Once again, I really urge people not to vote.  The quality of political discourse and the fakery posing as a 
genuine political campaign offends my sensibility and my intelligence.  I definitely do not plan on voting in 
such a ridiculous American Idol campaign that displays none of the pretense of even appearing like a 
genuine political contest.  We can say that we want the lesser of the evils presented us, but we will get 
nowhere with that as the elite can control whomever wins anyway like a marionette.  Have a loud no vote 
and speak against the process, not out of apathy but out of frustration and enlightened disgust!
     Nick


----------------------  Original Message:  ---------------------
From:    Ricky Baldwin <baldwinricky at yahoo.com>
To:      peace discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
Subject: [Peace-discuss] the primaries before Iowa
Date:    Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:11:31 +0000

> Somewhat along the lines of the article Mort just shared, the latest issue of Z 
> has an article
> with some telling data on the "elite's hidden primary."  It's not even all that 
> hidden, the
> sources being readily available (and it's not a new story, but updates are 
> important for telling
> the story).
> 
> For example, over 80 percent of all presidential campaign donations as of fall 
> '07 went to six
> candidates: Clinton, Obama, Romney, Giuliani, McCain and Edwards (in that 
> order).  Almost 70
> percent were over $1000 (meaning: not from you or me or probably anybody we 
> know).  The author
> goes into great detail, and it's fascinating, breaking out groups of big donors.  
> "Big Capital"
> (finance, real estate, insurance) favors Clinton, then Giuliani, Romney and 
> Obama.  The big law
> firms favor Clinton, Edwards then Obama.  Etc.
> 
> But it's not just donations.  Carl had earlier raised the grim point that the 
> evil Zbigniew
> Brzezinski is working for Obama (apparently, as in one of the articles Mort 
> shared, because he is
> supposed to have the best grasp of the "historical moment", a sort of 
> Machiavellian term as I
> understand it, meaning he'll do the most to advance nasty US ruling class 
> interests 'at this
> juncture' as Bush Sr used to say.
> 
> But all six of these top money getters also have high-powered advisers from the 
> notorious Council
> on Foreign Relations: McCain's list including Henry Kissinger, Lawrence 
> Eagleburger, Alexander
> Haig, George Schultz and Colin Powell.  Clinton of course has Bill and Madeleine 
> Albright, who've
> been sharing the stage with her, but also Richard Holbrooke (ugh!) and Bush Jr's 
> "surge" plan
> co-author John M Keane.  Not that the one with the most CFR members necessarily 
> wins, but the four
> with the most CFR help seem to be the front runners, and those without ... well, 
> they're starting
> to drop out even before we in Ill. can pretend to vote for them.
> 
> I think it's especially important for us here in Ill., and for us who know so 
> many in the
> "professional" class that strongly supports Obama, to keep on Obama's tail.  But 
> the jist of the
> article is more important, altho it's no shock to most of us, or (I think) to 
> most people: the
> ruling class has narrowed the field so severely based on its interests and its 
> estimations that
> whoever wins will suit them just fine.  (CFR is just one big way, a sort of 
> "peer review" for the
> ruling class, and a fair amount of donations will naturally accrue to whoever 
> donors believe is
> the likely choice - notice I don't say whose choice.)
> 
> And the corollary, for us activist types or just anyone harbors a democratic 
> hope, is the most
> important of all, tho the author has to cram it in quickly at the end, 
> presumably for reasons of
> space: none of the "serious" (i.e. elite, and therefore non-snowball) candidates 
> will do what the
> majority of people really need done unless we make them do it.  The author calls 
> it "people's
> movements" and "direct struggle", which seems to just about cover it.  
> 
> Keep it up, folks, groups like AWARE are the closest thing we have to a real 
> vote.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> ____
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list