[Peace-discuss] Street talk on Obama
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at uiuc.edu
Tue Jul 15 10:11:18 CDT 2008
*Barack Obama's Deceptive Left Impression*
July 15, 2008
By Paul Street
The deception conducted by political "elites" is about more than specific
factual lies. It is also and perhaps more significantly about the creation of a
sense, a feeling, an impression, an atmosphere, and/or even a mood.
Look at how the Cheney-Bush administration and the Pentagon worked with
congressional allies and corporate media to manufacture early consent for the
invasion and occupation of Iraq. The war masters concocted and disseminated a
large number of specific and materially false claims - factual lies - to build
their case for "war."
But it took more than that. Beyond the cooked intelligence, the White House and
its partners and "free press" enablers created a sense and atmosphere of
imminent danger. They generated the false impressions that Saddam Hussein's
Iraq was linked to 9/11 and al Qaeda and that Iraq and the Arab and Muslim
worlds posed grave threats to ordinary Americans. They set the mood for a bloody
invasion.
Another and different example comes from the supposedly "antiwar" presidential
campaign of Barack Obama. Facing criticism from some of his leftmost supporters
for his latest right-leaning actions and statements (on gun control, the death
penalty, campaign funding, Iraq, Iran, Israel-Palestine, Latin America, federal
wiretapping, economic policy...the list goes on), Obama has admonished his
"friends on the left" for failing to pay sufficiently close and careful
attention to him over recent months and years. Obama wants those increasingly
irritated supporters and (more importantly) the corporate forces that manage the
U.S. electorate to understand that his version of "progressivism" has never been
left.
He's got a point. From the beginning of his political career (in the Illinois
legislature in 1996) through his historic presidential campaign, Obama has been
a dedicated centrist. He has shown himself (for those willing and able to see)
to be deeply respectful to - and invested in - dominant hierarchies and
doctrines of class, race, nationality, religion, gender, and global power. A
close and careful analysis of his record shows that he is man from whom the
lords of capital and the masters of empire have nothing to fear.
Many progressive Obamanists have been woefully derelict when it comes to
investigating the historical record that shows this to be true. Some of them
have gone to remarkable lengths to advance the silly idea that the real Obama
beneath that record is a stealth "true progressive" -- a Manchurian leftist
doing "what he has to in order to win the presidency." Many of them have a
painfully pale and partial sense of what they mean when they call themselves
"progressives." And many have fallen prey to the illusion that Obama must be a
left-leaning progressive because of the color of his skin.
Still, I do not entirely blame many progressive Obamanists for becoming
excessively invested in "their" corporate candidate. Obama likes to complain
that voters see him as a blank sheet on to which they project their own
particular world view and aspirations. But he knows very well that he and his
corporate image and marketing consultants have done their best to sell Obama as
a man for all moral and ideological seasons (as well they "should" given the
ideology-blurring logic of the American "winner-take-all" "two party" and
candidate-centered elections system). And Obama knows very well that his
campaign has responded to widespread progressive sentiments and anger (fed by
eight incredibly reactionary and plutocratic years under George W. Bush) by
working to create the false impression among certain targeted audiences that he
is a progressive, populist, and peace-oriented opponent of Empire and
Inequality, Inc.
I observed Obama pose as a left-leaning antiwar and social justice progressive
again and again across Iowa during the long lead-up to his pivotal Caucus
victory in that state. I saw his faux-left act in numerous large speeches,
small town halls meetings, and in countless television commercials. In those
speeches and ads, Obama played up his brief history as a community organizer and
"civil rights lawyer" and deceptively trumpeted himself a strong opponent "from
the beginning" of the Iraq "war." He tried to steal John Edwards' "populist"
thunder by railing against NAFTA, Wal-Mart ("I wouldn't shop there"), Maytag
(for abandoning workers in Galesburg, Illinois and Newton, Iowa), and the
control of U.S. government by corporate interests - "the folks who write the big
checks." Obama deleted his long record of accommodation with - and sponsorship
by - powerful economic and political interests like (leading nuclear plant
operator) Exelon, Lester Crown (a leading Maytag director), Henry Crown
Investments, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bros., UBS, Arial Capital, Google, the
insurance lobby, Richard M. Daley, a number of corrupt Chicago real estate
[under-]developers (including Tony Rezko), and the Council on Foreign Relations.
He railed against big money control of U.S. politics even as he underpinned
his soon-to-be record-setting funding base with massive bundled investments from
the giants of Wall Street and while he took his economy policy counsel from
pro-"trade" (corporate-neoliberal) economists from the University of Chicago and
Harvard. From the start, "Obamanomics" has been a distinctly corporate-friendly
tendency in the militantly centrist tradition of the Democratic Leadership
Council (DLC) and the Hamilton Group - something few voters would have guessed
after hearing one of Obama's populace-pleasing speeches during the primaries.
When primary candidate Obama denounced the "old politics of Washington," he
talked about driving out the oil, insurance, and pharmaceutical lobbyists, not
collaborating with Republicans on federal wiretapping, limiting consumer damages
in civil lawsuits, and sustaining the criminal occupation of Iraq for an
indefinite period. At one point last fall, I actually received a mailing from
the Iowa Obama campaign telling me that I could "join the movement to stop the
[Iraq] war" by caucusing for Obama. Never mind that Obama was (and remains) a
fiscal and political supporter of the criminal occupation.
My efforts to educate Iowa Democratic voters about the progressive Obama
illusion stumbled on (a) the limits of my own persuasiveness and (b) the
determination of many of those voters to accept almost as a matter of faith that
Barack Obama was a left-leaning progressive. But both the voters and I were
both up against (c) the Obama campaign's carefully crafted and well-funded
effort to sell ("brand") their candidate to certain targeted voters and
activists as some sort of left progressive.
Should "left" Obama supporters have looked more deeply and critically into the
reality of their candidate's record and world view beneath his image? Sure.
Should they do the same now? Absolutely.
But Obama and his campaign are leading agents in the manufacture of left
illusion among progressive Democrats. There's an ugly undercurrent of blaming
your own victim in Obama's recent criticism of his leftmost backers.
Beneath this insulting treatment lurks Obama's sense that he can take left
progressives' support for granted in light of the alternative: Mad Bomber McCain.
He might want to re-think that. Obama's recent and ongoing lurch right,
including his terrible vote for federal wiretapping (with retroactive immunity
for telecommunications corporations), is costing him with left-leaning voters --
not a small group.
Obama is the likely winner in November. As his ascendancy approaches, it is
urgent that progressively inclined U.S. citizens peel off the layers of
seductive deception to see Obama and the Democrats for what they really are --
partners in corporate and imperial domination.
My forthcoming book "Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics" (order at
www.paradigmpublishers.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=186987) is not an
effort to help elect the arch-authoritarian messianic militarist John McCain.
It is designed to help progressive and other citizens distinguish myth from
reality in understanding the meaning of Obama. Besides giving a deep historical
interpretation of Obama's political and ideological origins and essence, it
seeks to help position activists and citizens to respond positively and
productively to the Obama phenomenon in coming months and years. That starts by
differentiating the really existing Obama from the Obama that many wish to see.
Veteran radical historian Paul Street (paulstreet99 at yahoo.com)lives in Iowa
City, IA. Street is the author of Empire and Inequality: America and the World
Since 9/11 (Boulder, CO: Paradigm), Segregated Schools: Educational Apartheid in
the Post-Civil Rights Era (New York: Routledge, 2005); Racial Oppression in the
Global Metropolis (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007); and Barack Obama and
the Future of American Politics (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, order at:
www.paradigmpublishers.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=186987)
From: Z Space - The Spirit Of Resistance Lives
URL: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/commentaries/3554
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list