[Peace-discuss] Sabra rattling
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at uiuc.edu
Sun Jun 22 22:15:22 CDT 2008
[There was some discussion at the AWARE meeting tonight as to how this "leak"
was to be understood. --CGE]
Leaked Israeli drill seen as U.S. pressure on Iran
Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:25am EDT
By Jeffrey Heller
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - A U.S. leak of an Israeli air exercise reported to be
practice for possible bombing of Iran's nuclear sites was seen in Israel on
Sunday as a deliberate move to increase pressure on Tehran to halt sensitive
atomic work.
"When the diplomacy of economic and political pressure fails to produce results,
a shift is made to gunboat diplomacy," wrote Alex Fishman, military affairs
correspondent of Israel's biggest newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth.
"As the Iranian regime discusses the European Union representative's most recent
offer to halt its nuclear program in exchange for extensive benefits, the
Americans opted to add a bit more pressure in the shape of Israel's air force,"
he said.
Citing unidentified Pentagon sources, the New York Times said on Friday more
than 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15 jets took part in a long-range Mediterranean
exercise this month that appeared to be a rehearsal for real missions over Iran.
Israel did not confirm the reported exercise had taken place. But officials said
such drills have been commonplace at least since 2005.
Commentator Amir Rappaport, writing in Israel's Maariv daily, said it was likely
the Pentagon leak was an attempt "to deter Iran and increase pressure on it to
cooperate" with international nuclear watchdogs.
Earlier this month, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana went to
Tehran to deliver a revised offer of economic and political incentives from the
United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China for Iran to stop
pursuing technology that could yield atomic bombs.
Iran has made clear it does not plan to stop a uranium enrichment program which
it says is aimed at fueling power plants.
ATTACK
Israeli Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz, a former defense chief, told Yedioth
several weeks ago that "if Iran continues with its program for developing
nuclear weapons, we will attack it".
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, stopping short of an explicit threat to
strike Iran, has called for "all possible means" to be used to stop its nuclear
activities.
An analysis in Israel's Haaretz newspaper said the Olmert government viewed an
attack on Iran as a last resort and would not strike without first coordinating
its actions with the United States.
"Another variable is international sanctions on Iran. These are being applied
sluggishly," Haaretz's Yossi Melman wrote. "But Israel still has not given up
hope that Moscow and Beijing will change their policies and impose harsher
sanctions."
Israel, which is believed to have the region's only atomic arsenal, bombed
Iraq's nuclear reactor at Osiraq in 1981. Last September, it mounted a similar
raid against a Syrian site that the United States described as a secret reactor
built with North Korean help -- a charge denied by Damascus.
Sam Gardiner, a retired U.S. air force colonel who now stages wargames for
various government agencies in Washington, said Iran's nuclear facilities were
too distant, numerous and fortified for Israel to tackle unilaterally.
"The United States thinks in terms of around 1,000 'aim points' while an Israeli
strike would be against around 100 'aim points,'" he said, adding that such a
mission would be "disruptive" rather than "destructive".
(Additional reporting by Dan Williams, Editing by Dominic Evans)
© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users may download and print
extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial
use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including
by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written
consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered
trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.
Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to the Editorial Handbook which requires
fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list