[Peace-discuss] Re: [Peace] NEED ONE MORE PERSON: National Assembly to End the Iraq War and Occupation

[C. G. Estabrook]

I never doubted your uniqueness, John.


John W. wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:08 AM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at uiuc.edu 
> <mailto:galliher at uiuc.edu>> wrote:
> 
>     Why don't you go, John?  I think it would be great to have AWARE
>     represented by a Man of the People (especially one who knows what
>     the LSAT is).  --CGE
> 
> 
> This is nice, Carl.  You finally seem to be acknowledging my uniqueness 
> as an asset to the community, rather than some sort of liability.  Thank 
> you.
> 
>  
> 
>     John W. wrote:
> 
> 
>         This sounds like one of those convoluted questions on the LSAT
>         (Law School Aptitude Test, for the uninitiated).  :-)
> 
> 
>         On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Randall Cotton
>         <recotton at earthlink.net <mailto:recotton at earthlink.net>
>         <mailto:recotton at earthlink.net <mailto:recotton at earthlink.net>>>
>         wrote:
> 
>            At last Sunday's AWARE meeting, funds were approved to send
>         up to 4
>            AWARE
>            folks to this weekend's gathering of the "National Assembly
>         to End the
>            Iraq War and Occupation". Details of my proposal on this are
>         in this
>            week's minutes (near the bottom of the post) at:
> 
>          
>          http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace/2008-June/021403.html
> 
>            And we have 4 folks who are interested in going - myself
>         included (on my
>            own dime). The other three folks are:
> 
>            1. David Harley
>            2. Mort Brussel
>            3. Roger Epperson
> 
>            HOWEVER, Mort may not be able to go because of a physical injury.
>            FURTHERMORE, if Mort can't go, we may only be able to send
>         ONE person
>            (David). Since I would only go at my own cost (on principle,
>         since I'm
>            proposing all this), I won't be able to go unless at least
>         TWO other
>            folks
>            go (I just couldn't afford it otherwise). In addition, Roger
>         said he'd
>            only go as the 4th person. Yes, it's a little convoluted, but
>         the upshot
>            is:
> 
>            *** WE NEED A SECOND PERSON ***
> 
>            so that the third person (me) and fourth person (Roger) can
>         go. Mort
>            would
>            really like to go as the second person, but just may not be
>         able to
>            because of his injury (and it will definitely be a physical
>         hardship for
>            him if he does go). He plans to make a call on this tomorrow
>         night.
> 
>            So we're in serious need of an AWAREista to commit to joining
>         us (or at
>            least be an alternate for Mort in case he can't make it), pulling
>            everything together so we can send a full contingent of 4
>         folks (the max
>            we can put in one hotel room).
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss