[Peace-discuss] busloads to the dark side

Jenifer Cartwright jencart13 at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 23 16:45:31 CDT 2008


I taped "Now" on Friday and just now finished watching it. Exactly as John said, a very powerful show... and the documentary appears to be as well -- it'll be showing in theatres Spring 2008 -- maybe it'll come to the Art (we can all request it). The young man in question has become an activist and spokesperson for IVAW, a group we all need to $upport (on-line or P O Box 8246, Phila, PA 19101). I'd be glad to lend the tape if anyone wants to borrow it. 
   --Jenifer

"John W." <jbw292002 at gmail.com> wrote:
  
Did anyone watch Bill Moyers last night?  The subject was another powerful documentary film called "Body of War", produced by Phil Donahue, which portrays the daily life of a young (27-year-old) man in Kansas City who volunteered for the military to "get the bad guys" several days after 9/11, was sent to Iraq rather than Afghanistan, was shot five days after arriving in Iraq, and is now paralyzed from the "nipples" down.  It graphically portrays the human cost of war.  One particularly poignant scene is where the young man is sitting in his wheelchair, watching some sort of TV show in which our nation's bright and shiny leaders, attired in tuxedos and without noticeable physical impairments, are making jokes about Osama bin Laden and so on.

Ironically, while the young man and his mother seem to have gained a new awareness of American foreign policy, the kid's stepfather still believes that we're in Iraq "because we want peace", and his younger brother enlists in the military to go get the bad guys in Iraq.

John Wason



At 03:36 PM 3/22/2008, Jenifer Cartwright wrote:

      
   The really dark side in Taxi to Dark Side and Winter Soldier is not only torture (horrible enough in its own right) but the attitude (among the highest-to-lowest government and military officials) that justifies torture and by extension allows/encourages/rewards behavior that leads to the unspeakable cruelty/sadism shown in both these films. These films are horrible to watch because horrible things are shown AND and because they confirm our worst fears that war (and other dreadful things like slavery) brings out the very worst in people -- even our "brave and noble men and women in uniform" and gives those who might not otherwise behave so sadistically a "reason" to do so... (though you have to wonder about the guys who tho't they might get guidelines in writing for this kind of thing -- no internal yardstick for right and wrong??) while those who set the behaviors in motion avoid the consequences altogether...
  
   
   
   It doesn't help that the US us a culture that glorifies violence and whose filmakers (and TV producers) earn billions showing what "good guys" do to "bad guys" -- forget Miranda rights -- in order to protect the weak and innocent (i e all of us).
  
   
   
   My 2c worth (along w/ Ricky's) doesn't put this stuff front and center in the MSM where it belongs, unfortunately (not something that resonates w/ the govt and corps who have a vested interest in keeping wars of aggression and empire going, and who do so by keeping the voters in hyper-patriotic mode). 
  
    --Jenifer   


  
   Ricky Baldwin <baldwinricky at yahoo.com> wrote:
  
  
   Catharine and I just saw "Taxi to the Dark Side" last night, so we're still processing
  
   a lot, but what struck me most was what the convicted torturers had to say about what
  
   they did. One in particular made it clearest: "I would never do that again without
  
   something in writing," or words to that effect. 

  
   In writing?

  
   We had some other thoughts, but for now I'll just stick to this and one related topic:
  
   the poll mentioned showing 35 percent of Americans would find torture justified in some
  
   circumstances. Of course, depending on the wording, it sounds like almost 2/3 still
  
   said torture was never justified - which is encouraging at least - but I'd like to read
  
   the actual poll questions, results, margins of error, etc. I'd also like to check out
  
   other polls on similar subjects, to see if they conflict.

  
   But it is still disturbing that so many people would say, 'OK, go ahead, torture.' I
  
   know we've had our disagreements on this list about "Hitler's Willing Executioners" -
  
   the big debate is really how broadly the incidents in the book generalize, not whether
  
   they happened at all - but I think there's something in it, and this documentary
  
   illustrates what I'm on about. 

  
   In "Hitler's Willing Executioners" there are people who commit atrocities, and it's
  
   clearly not because they fear retribution if they don't, because they exceed their
  
   orders (whereas others in the book do not follow orders directing them to commit such
  
   acts, and by the way receive little or no discipline). In historical studies of the
  
   'Hitlerzeit' there's also the problem of millions of people supporting Hitler (even if
  
   it was less than the Nazis claimed), maybe without detailed knowledge of what went on
  
   in the worst camps, but with full knowledge of some pretty bad stuff.

  
   So, I'm reminded of Noam Chomsky's remark that it's a serious question whether what the
  
   US needs is "dissent or denazification."

  
   This film makes the point that investigations were all focussed downward, not up the
  
   chain of command. Fair enough, and the evidence presented is damning. However,
  
   interviewees keep saying over and over that the interrogators were being given no clear
  
   directions, were being pressured for results, etc., and there's at least passing
  
   mention of working 16 hour days and living at the Bagram camp and other factors that
  
   would certainly have worked on the psychology of the interrogators themselves. Will
  
   this combination of factors produce horrific results? Sure. There are plenty of
  
   psychological studies that bear this out. And are these guys entitled to consideration
  
   of these factors? I'd say so. But nobody in the film ever said, for the sake of
  
   people who may in the future (or present) be dressed up in uniforms and sent in to get
  
   information from chained up prisoners, 'But it's still wrong to do these things, and
  
   you are responsible for your own actions - under international law and basic ethical
  
   considerations.'

  
   The torturers in the film were tried for killing one prisoner, not for the day-to-day
  
   stuff they did. One of them was richly rewarded, as the film points out.

  
   And how many people, admittedly without detailed information in most cases, will still
  
   argue that torture is acceptable - or that some of these acts are not torture, which is
  
   just a dodge? A lot. Maybe not most, but still too many. We have our work cut out
  
   for us. The fear, the group-think, the widespread social value placed on obedience to
  
   authority ... these are, I think, what they mean when they say if you can't talk to
  
   your neighbors about your politics then your opinions aren't worth having.

  
   There are symbols, sure, that people can't get past. The flag, homosexuality, Jesus,
  
   etc. But if we can't talk to people, human being to human being, about the nightmarish
  
   brutality being committed in our names, then what hope do we have?

  
   I think we should all be encouraged that this documentary won an Oscar and that it is
  
   now being shown, at least here and there and with difficulty. I think we can take
  
   courage from all the work of AWARE and other groups that have challenged the terror
  
   wars and these related policies like torture, and from the overwhelmingly positive
  
   response that we get nowadays. The Administration has been forced to respond. The
  
   leading Republican candidate for president, as conservative and nasty and pro-war as he
  
   is, is on the Rush Limbaugh's and the Ann Coulter's bad list for breaking ranks on at
  
   least part of it (the torture). And the Democrats, as sorry as they are, have at least
  
   had to fight over these issues, each trying to appear moral while loyal to the
  
   fatherland at the same time.

  
   We are having an effect. And I still think many, many more people are on 'our side'
  
   than the media and the rest of the elite would have us believe. It's just sobering to
  
   realize how many aren't, and what they believe and will accept. But we have to realize
  
   it, I think, in order to proceed.

  
   My 2c.
  
   Ricky 

       
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20080323/77d8523d/attachment.html


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list