[Peace-discuss] Re: [Peace] URGENT! Democracy at WEFT under threat
(again)
lweber0311 at comcast.net
lweber0311 at comcast.net
Fri May 30 23:49:37 CDT 2008
Randall, I know so little about all this, but the media is all a giant problem/disaster, so if I could do anything to help, I would like to do that. I can probably put together some kind of letter (basically from your letter), but "immediately" is there something else I could do?
linda
--
live simply
love generously
care deeply
speak kindly
leave the rest to God
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Randall Cotton" <recotton at earthlink.net>
> The democratic, community nature of our community radio station, WEFT
> 90.1FM is (once again) under serious threat.
>
> Background:
> -------------
> Every year, WEFT conducts an election for Board members in which each WEFT
> Member (anyone who contributes $40 or more) is given the opportunity to
> vote by mail-in ballot. Anyone is allowed to run (the station Bylaws only
> require Illinois residency and U.S. citizenship). You may remember that
> last year, the sitting Board of Directors tampered with the election by
> changing the rules in the middle of that election. Their action favored
> the incumbent candidate (the Chair of the Board at the time) to the
> disadvantage of the 5 challenging candidates. It was the Chair himself who
> proposed the motion to change the rules. This resulted in a lawsuit by 16
> WEFT Members that successfully forced the Board to rescind their decision
> as part of an out-of-court settlement. The Chair was ultimately voted out
> of office as part of that same election because of his involvement in this
> matter.
>
> For reference, the lawsuit is online at:
>
> www.reformweft.org/lawsuit.pdf
>
> Though I was heavily involved in the effort to reverse last year's
> tampering, I was not a candidate myself. This year, I did come forward as
> a candidate. And this time, the Board has acted even more aggressively to
> manipulate the election. Last Tuesday evening, May 27th, the Board simply
> voted to bar me from running, even though they had already accepted and
> formally announced my candidacy on May 15th.
>
> Our community radio station is supposed to be democratically run through
> this democratic election process. The Board is the highest governing
> body at the station. For that body to attempt to dictate who may or may
> not run in a Membership-wide election for seats to that very body,
> profoundly harms WEFT's democracy. In this way the integrity of the
> station's democratic foundation and community nature stands to be severely
> compromised.
>
> My candidacy:
> ---------------
> I decided to run for the Board in this year's election (scheduled to start
> next week) in part to help correct the culture that lead to last year's
> election corruption. But there are other reasons as well. In fact, WEFT
> has many problem these days and is quickly losing support in the
> community. We attract donation pledges at less than half the rate we did 5
> or 6 years ago (and 38% less than even one year ago). The candidacy
> statement I submitted to WEFT provides more detail on this and also a
> rundown of other issues affecting the station adversely these days. This
> statement is online at:
>
> www.reformweft.org/candidacy.pdf
>
> I complied with all requirements for submitting my candidacy and on May
> 15th, the station formally announced me as a candidate along with two
> others. A copy of this announcement is online at:
>
> www.reformweft.org/announcement.html
>
> My investigative report:
> ------------------------
> 10 days after submitting my candidacy, on May 24th, I published a
> comprehensive report regarding a different serious issue at WEFT that
> motivated my candidacy - the performance and management of the paid
> Underwriting Coordinator. It's a very well-documented investigation of
> the poor performance of the station's Underwriting Coordinator position,
> the ineffective management of that position, and the failure of the Board
> of Directors to correct the situation for more than 2 years. The report is
> about 13 pages long (but with more than 120 pages of supporting
> documentation). The focus of the report details precisely how this state
> of affairs is harming the station and its mission. The report is available
> online at:
>
> www.reformweft.org/ucreport.pdf
>
> Removal of my candidacy:
> ----------------------------
> Three days after I began publicizing that report, on May 27th, at the WEFT
> Board of Directors monthly meeting, the Board went into an unannounced
> "closed session" (Board meetings are generally required to be open to the
> public). During that closed session, the Board voted to bar me from
> running and remove my name from the list of candidates.
>
> Though I have long been speaking out about problems at the station and
> advocating for change (as a Member, Volunteer, Associate and also while
> serving on the Board previously from 2004-2006), I believe my recent
> investigative report, released 3 days before I was barred, combined with
> my efforts to help reverse last year's election tampering, contributed
> heavily to the Board's decision to remove me from the election. This
> action provides a very damaging appearance for the Board and severely
> harms the station's democracy and the organization's integrity.
>
> What can you do to help?
> --------------------------
> Regardless of whether you've ever contributed to WEFT, the station is
> meant to serve the community as a public service. Anyone in the community
> has the legitimacy to communicate their reaction regarding this decision
> to the Board. You can send mail to boardchair at weft.org to formally
> register your opinion and urge the Board to reverse their decision before
> the ballots are mailed out on June 5th. Given that the Chair has been the
> primary advocate for this action, however, I would also suggest sending a
> copy of your communication to weft-comm at curadio.net so that it is
> documented publicly. weft-comm is an open, public community mailing list
> that was set up to discuss issues regarding WEFT (it was recently set up
> independently from the station after WEFT's management shut down the
> station's only open discussion mailing list, "wefta").
>
> You can also *subscribe* to the weft-comm at curadio.net mailing list and
> join in discussion regarding this and other station matters by visiting
> www.curadio.net on the web.
>
> Thanks for your attention to this issue and I hope you'll take action to
> oppose what's going on. Not because it's a matter of unfairness to me
> personally. That is not the issue and is of no significance (by the way,
> Board seats are not paid positions and are not compensated in any way).
> The issue is the damage being brought against what is supposed to be and
> what we've all understood to be a community media resource, democratically
> run by its paying Members.
>
> Indeed, WEFT's Bylaws encompass many democratic provisions, not just this
> election. And democratic control of public access to media channels is
> already in a desperately poor state in this country. Community media
> channels provide an invaluable alternative to increasingly monolithic and
> conglomerated corporate media and are only becoming more important and
> precious with time.
>
> But for years, the current leadership at WEFT has been closing the station
> in on itself, erecting walls instead of reaching out, becoming more and
> more insular and self-serving. And there have been serious management
> problems that are being ignored (the matter of the Underwriting
> Coordinator I delineate in my report is hardly the worst of it). Now the
> leadership is engaging in a direct and quite undemocratic attempt to
> control who may or may not join that leadership. If this is allowed to
> stand, it will set a horrible precedent, deal a severe blow to the
> community nature of this important public media access service and
> institution, and turn WEFT into even more of an insider's club than it
> already is.
>
> There are other ways you can help - please contact me *IMMEDIATELY* for
> details if you're interested. Immediate action is necessary due to
> election-related deadlines - the deadline to gain voting eligibility is
> tomorrow, Saturday May 31st and the ballots are scheduled to be mailed out
> to WEFT Members on Thursday, June 5th . Please feel free to reply to me
> directly via email or, if you prefer, call me any day, any time between
> 7:30AM and 1AM regarding this matter at 217-351-8644 (home) or
> 217-722-8470 (cell).
>
> Randall Cotton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace mailing list
> Peace at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20080531/e80316af/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list