[Peace-discuss] proposed Organizational Endorsement of the Employee Free Choice Act...

[Karen Medina]

Bob Naiman,

AWARE will discuss your proposal at the next meeting.

Good choice for your latest email ... to focus on why the Employee Free Choice 
Act applies to just about everything that the country is facing and reacting to. 

RE: the anti-racism aspect of AWARE. 

War is always racist. 

So in the name, AWARE, the anti-racism is tied to the anti-war word. This has 
disappointed a great many people. 

If AWARE were to focus on the anti-racism, then we would be going in so many 
different directions and there would not be an anti-war effort in the community. 

We leave some of the anti-racism movement to CU Citizens for Peace and 
Justice -- who don't actually have racism in their title but do center most if not 
all their activities on anti-racism efforts. 

We leave other aspects of anti-racism movement to the local New Sanctuary 
movement. Mostly this group deals with a sane immigration reform.

AWARE does have an anti-racism working group, but mostly what they do is 
attend CUCPJ meetings and/or New Sanctuary Movement meetings and keep 
AWARE informed.

Bob, you might contact both these groups as well.

-karen medina

---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:23:20 -0500
>From: "Robert Naiman" <naiman.uiuc at gmail.com>  
>Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] proposed Organizational Endorsement of the 
Employee Free Choice Act...  
>To: kmedina at illinois.edu
>Cc: "peace discuss" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>
>Understood; though presumably one could add: to the anti-racism issue.
>As we all know, the issue of scope could be interpreted in different
>ways, there are all kinds of precedents one could point to in AWARE's
>actions in the past; I leave this discussion to others.
>
>I would, though, like to point out the following:
>
>As you look around the country, over the last many years, there is a
>high correlation between union density and everything decent. Look at
>states where unions are strong and weak, and look where there is a
>death penalty, look at aid to the poor, look at what the minimum wage
>is, look at what anti-discrimination protections are on the books,
>look at how they are enforced.
>
>And there are two basic reasons for this: one is that wherever unions
>are strong, workers have more political power. And the second is:
>wherever unions are strong, workers are more progressive, because
>there is an infrastructure that it constantly telling workers a
>different story from the corporate press about why things are the way
>they are and how things should be.
>
>Regarding the latter, consider, among many examples, the current
>presidential campaign. Regardless of what one thinks of Obama's
>politics, it is indisputable that a central dynamic of the campaign
>has been the question of race, and how white working class voters
>would respond to the prospect of a black president. And unions have
>been in the forefront of taking the issue of racism among white
>working class voters head on.
>
>If the Employee Free Choice Act, or something close to it, becomes
>law, there will be a dramatic expansion of unions in the United
>States, particularly in the South. Polling has consistently showed
>that many non-union workers would love to be in a union, if they could
>get past the current regime of employer intimidation. In addition to
>bringing economic benefit and workplace protection and voice to those
>folks who gain union representation, it would fundamentally alter the
>politics of the United States in a progressive way. There will be more
>anti-discrimination protections and they will be better enforced
>throughout the country; more peace candidates will be elected to
>federal office; there will be fewer wars. It's hard to imagine any
>feasible progressive reform in the next four years that would have a
>greater long-term impact on the United States than making it easier
>for workers to win union representation.
>
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Karen Medina <kmedina at illinois.edu> 
wrote:
>> Jenifer and Bob N,
>>
>> RE: Organizational Endorsement of the Employee Free Choice Act
>>
>> There is probably no dispute as to whether this is a worthy cause or not.
>> The issue would be whether this is related to the anti-war issue.
>>
>> Jenifer C asked:
>>> Not sure how many member votes would be needed for the endorsement, 
nor
>>> whether strong opposition would preclude it. Anybody?
>>
>> Jenifer, the definition of consensus is pretty straightforward.
>>
>> -karen medina
>>
>>> Organizational Endorsement of the Employee Free Choice Act
>>>
>>> We, the undersigned organization, are concerned about the pervasive
>>> violation of the rights of working people when they attempt to
>>> exercise their basic freedom to form unions and bargain collectively
>>> for a better life.
>>>
>>> The Employee Free Choice Act is the first step to fixing this badly
>>> broken system.  The Employee Free Choice Act will:
>>> -       Strengthen penalties for companies that coerce or intimidate
>>> employees trying to form unions and bargain.
>>> -       Establish mediation and binding arbitration when the employer and
>>> workers cannot agree on a first contract.
>>> -       Enable employees to form unions when a majority signs
>>> authorization cards.
>>>
>>> Our organization endorses the Employee Free Choice Act and permits our
>>> organization's name to be used on materials that may be reproduced and
>>> distributed to the press and the general public.
>>>
>>> PLEASE TYPE or PRINT CLEARLY:
>>>
>>> Name: ______________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Title: _______________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Organization: ________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Address:
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> City: ______________________State: ___________  Zip:__________________
>>>
>>> Phone: _______________________________
>>>
>>> Fax: _________________________________
>>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________