[Peace-discuss] Not a withdrawal: a lie

C. G. Estabrook galliher at uiuc.edu
Fri Feb 27 11:03:17 CST 2009


[Neither Bush nor Obama ever meant to withdraw from Iraq in the sense of giving 
up control of US military bases and hence of the oil flow.  The occupation will 
continue indefinitely -- unless the resistance in the whole region brings it to 
an end. --CGE]

	Posted on Friday, February 27, 2009
	Obama to extend Iraq withdrawal timetable; 50,000 troops to stay
	By Steven Thomma | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — Amid complaints from has own party that he's moving too slowly to 
end the war in Iraq, President Barack Obama will announce Friday that U.S. 
combat troops will be withdrawn by Aug. 31, 2010, but that as many as 50,000 
Marines and soldiers would remain until the end of 2011.

Obama will announce his plans during a visit with troops at Camp Lejeune, N.C., 
where he'll also visit with Marines who are being deployed to Afghanistan, 
senior administration officials said.

As he moves to draw down the war in Iraq after six years and more than 4,200 
U.S. dead, he's also moving to escalate the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan.

The 18-month timetable for withdrawing combat troops from Iraq is two months 
longer than he promised during his campaign. Aides who spoke on condition of 
anonymity to speak frankly said that military commanders wanted the extra time. 
"The president found that compelling," said one senior administration official.

The pace of the drawdown will be left to commanders and determined by events on 
the ground as well as politics in Washington. Although U.S. and Iraqi casualties 
have dropped sharply, and recent provincial elections were held without major 
incidents, it's not clear whether Iraq's rival factions and their militias have 
abandoned violence or are merely biding their time.

A key factor in the pace of the U.S. drawdown will be making sure that there are 
sufficient U.S. forces in Iraq to assure that national elections scheduled for 
December are peaceful, officials said. Another will be the speed with which 
Iraqi military and security forces gain the ability to maintain order without 
American help.

Under Obama's plan, a force of between 35,000 and 50,000 U.S. troops would 
remain in Iraq after Aug. 31, 2010, to train, equip and advise Iraqi forces, 
help protect withdrawing forces and work on counterterrorism. They'd remain 
until Dec. 31, 2011, the date on which the Bush administration agreed to 
withdraw all troops under a pact with Iraq.

That number, too, could depend on conditions in Iraq and on the need for 
additional U.S. troops in Afghanistan, where the Taliban have made significant 
gains, and where national elections also are scheduled.

The plan to leave as many as 50,000 troops in Iraq after August 2010 upset 
several top Democrats in Congress, who want far fewer troops left after the 
August date.

"I'm happy to listen to the secretary of defense and the president, but when 
they talk about 50,000, that's a little higher number than I had anticipated," 
said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., before meeting with Obama at the 
White House.

Obama started reviewing options in mid-December, aides said, then "really began 
in earnest" after taking office. He met on Jan. 21 with top commanders, 
including Defense Secretary Robert Gates; Navy Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Army Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of the 
U.S. Central Command; and Army Gen. Ray Odierno, the commander of U.S. troops in 
Iraq.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/62930.html


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list