[Peace-discuss] US Senate Supports Israel's Gaza Incursion
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at uiuc.edu
Fri Jan 9 01:02:01 CST 2009
Perhaps. But note the following, from a piece by Stephen Zunes, dated 6 January
2009 <http://www.alternet.org/audits/117475?page=1>:
"In apparent anticipation of the large numbers of Palestinian deaths that would
result from such military operations in the Gaza Strip, the House passed a
resolution in March, 2008, during an outbreak of fighting, that claimed, 'Those
responsible for launching rocket attacks against Israel routinely embed their
production facilities and launch sites amongst the Palestinian civilian
population, utilizing them as human shields.' The resolution goes on to
specifically condemn 'the use of innocent Palestinian civilians as human shields
by those who carry out rocket and other attacks' and yet again makes note of
Palestinians who 'continue to be utilized as human shields by terrorist
organizations.'
"But according to Joe Stork of the Middle East division of Human Rights Watch,
while Hamas failed to take all feasible precautions to protect civilians in the
densely populated Gaza Strip, the watchdog group had found no instances of Hamas
actually using human shields in the legally defined sense of deliberately using
civilians as a means of deterring counterattacks. Despite my contacting the
offices of more than a dozen Democratic members of Congress who supported the
resolution -- all of whom are members of the so-called Progressive Caucus --
none of them could provide any examples of Hamas actually using human shields.
It appears that the Democrats' goal in pushing through this resolution was to
convince their constituents that it was the Palestinians, not the Israelis who
were attacking them, who were responsible for civilian casualties and who would
likewise be responsible for the far greater number of civilian casualties that
would inevitably result from the Israeli bombardment and invasion which was to
commence later that year.
"The resolution also gave unqualified support for the Israeli government's
attacks against the Gaza Strip, even as Amnesty International condemned Israel's
'reckless disregard for civilian life' in its bombing and shelling of civilian
population centers. The AI report also noted how the attacks by Palestinians
against civilian-populated areas in Israel, which the report also roundly
condemned, 'does not make it legitimate for the Israeli authorities to launch
reckless air and artillery strikes which wreak such death and destruction among
Palestinian civilians.'
"Not a single one of the 230 Democrats in the House of Representatives voted
against the resolution. (There were four abstentions, and 12 did not vote.) This
sent a clear signal that there would be no opposition in Congress -- which
provides over $4 billion annually in unconditional military and economic aid to
the Israeli government -- for an even larger military assault against the
Palestinian population of the enclave..."
[In fact, the vote in favor of that resolution was 404-1, the one being Rep.
Ron Paul; Kucinich did not vote, along with 7 Republicans and 12 Democrats. It
will be interesting to see if the present round of US/Israeli barbarism changes
many votes. --CGE]
Robert Naiman wrote:
> US Senate Supports Israel's Gaza Incursion
> http://uk.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUKN08534236
>
> Next: consideration by the House, where there is likely to be more friction.
>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list