[Peace-discuss] Obama gets another one right
E. Wayne Johnson
ewj at pigs.ag
Mon Jan 26 21:01:25 CST 2009
*dictionary.com has this entry:
goos?y*
--adjective goos?i?er, goos?i?est.
1. like a goose; foolish or giddy.
2. Informal.
a. ticklish; reacting very quickly to touch.
*b.* *nervous; jumpy; uneasy.*
Also, goosey.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Origin: *
1805--15; goose <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=goose&db=luna>
+ -y <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=-y&db=luna> ^1
Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
> Naw, y're making that up... and/or reaching. Ya lost this one, kid.
>
> --- On *Mon, 1/26/09, E. Wayne Johnson /<ewj at pigs.ag>/* wrote:
>
> From: E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag>
> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Obama gets another one right
> To: jencart13 at yahoo.com
> Cc: "Bob Illyes" <illyes at uiuc.edu>, loriserb at loriserb.info
> Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 7:34 PM
>
> goosey - nervous, jumpy, uneasy
>
> Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
>> A little goosey?? What does THAT mean?????
>>
>> --- On *Mon, 1/26/09, E. Wayne Johnson /<ewj at pigs.ag>/* wrote:
>>
>> From: E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag>
>> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Obama gets another one right
>> To: jencart13 at yahoo.com
>> Cc: "Bob Illyes" <illyes at uiuc.edu>, loriserb at loriserb.info
>> Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 5:17 PM
>>
>> We all get a little goosey about some of these questions.
>>
>> Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
>>> Took this off peace-discuss, but couldn't resist the
>>> temptation to say I think Wayne's been goosed, and to thank
>>> Bob for doing it (honk if you like puns... and gays).
>>> --Jenifer
>>>
>>> --- On *Mon, 1/26/09, Bob Illyes /<illyes at uiuc.edu>/* wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Bob Illyes <illyes at uiuc.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Obama gets another one right
>>> To: peace-discuss at anti-war.net
>>> Cc: loriserb at loriserb.info
>>> Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 3:45 PM
>>>
>>> Wayne writes "As a biologist, I really do view the practice of a homosexual
>>> lifestyle as a pathological behaviour. A speedy recovery is hoped for."
>>>
>>> But if you look to nature, Wayne, you find homosexual behavior in other
>>> species. It is not common, but there is no evidence that it is pathological,
>>> i.e., that homosexuals are in general either damaged or dangerous. Most of the
>>> damage done to children is done by heterosexuals, simply because they are the
>>> larger group.
>>>
>>> Konrad Lorentz studied homosexual behavior among greylag geese extensively. In
>>> this animal, it is speculated that the threesomes that form (two males and one
>>> female) are better able to protect the young, and it is thus a trait that has
>>> been selected for. I don't think we should be in the business of calling a
>>> trait a pathology when we don't know why it exists or what its advantages
>>> are. Nature is often wiser than we are.
>>>
>>> One of the dead ends of "natural law" was the notion that a trait
>>> existed for one purpose only. If sex existed for reproduction, it was argued, it
>>> should not be used for other purposes. But this is simple-minded, isn't it?
>>> Yet behind all of the arguments about sexuality and reproduction lurks the same
>>> simple-minded notion that there is only one thing going on, and to mess with
>>> that one thing is to mess with the one God.
>>>
>>> If this is a right notion of God, then God is definitely a guy, and like most
>>> guys has trouble with doing more than one thing at a time.
>>>
>>> Bob (definitely a guy, and definitely not God)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
Skipped content of type multipart/related
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list