[Peace-discuss] Taming and training
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Wed Jun 3 15:43:46 CDT 2009
Mon 01 Jun 2009
Death of the Republic
Written by Chris Floyd
Glenn Greenwald, among others, is enraged at Barack Obama's eager embrace of the
latest disgorgement of third-rate juntaism to belch forth from the hallowed
halls of the U.S. Congress: the "Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act of
2009," sponsored by those ever-stalwart champions of liberty, Senators Lindsey
Graham and Joe Lieberman. As Greenwald describes it:
"[The bill] literally has no purpose other than to allow the government to
suppress any "photograph taken between September 11, 2001 and January 22, 2009
relating to the treatment of individuals engaged, captured, or detained after
September 11, 2001, by the Armed Forces of the United States in operations
outside of the United States." As long as the Defense Secretary certifies --
with no review possible -- that disclosure would "endanger" American citizens or
our troops, then the photographs can be suppressed even if [the Freedom of
Information Act] requires disclosure...What kind of a country passes a law that
has no purpose other than to empower its leader to suppress evidence of the
torture it inflicted on people? Read the language of the bill; it doesn't even
hide the fact that its only objective is to empower the President to conceal
evidence of war crimes."
What kind of country passes such a law? Why, a cheap, corrupt, third-rate junta
state, which has elevated war and militarism into its supreme value, its
"ultimate concern," its divinity -- that's what kind of country. What other kind
of country did you think was skulking there between Mexico and Canada these days?
But the perniciousness of the act doesn't lie merely in its immediate goal --
suppressing war crimes evidence to protect the Terror War machinery that Obama
has inherited and is expanding. After all, Obama has been working overtime from
the beginning to suppress war crimes evidence against his predecessor, whom he
treats more and more as a revered elder, not the despised leader of a
discredited faction. No, it is, as they say, the principle of the thing: the
enshrinement in law of the notion that anything that could be construed as
"harmful" to American troops and operatives abroad -- or even the sad sacks back
home -- can be suppressed by the government.
Adopting the principle of potential "endangerment" as a justification for
government repression is not just an open door to tyranny -- it kicks the door
down and brings the rest of the front wall crashing with it. But of course, that
edifice crumbled a long time ago. The only thing remotely surprising about this
latest Banana Republic Act is that is so blatant in its gutless abandonment of
even the slightest pretense that the United States is anything other than a
militarist empire. And yet so many people -- including Greenwald at times --
continue to praise the new imperial manager whenever he makes a "good decision"
or implements a "good policy" -- presumably with the idea that you can tame or
train the president by rewarding him for good deeds and sternly admonishing him
when he does wrong...
Full article at <http://www.chris-floyd.com/>.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list