[Peace-discuss] Stop the disgusting liar
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Sat Jun 27 21:49:09 CDT 2009
Obama to Seek $83.4 Billion for Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
Thursday 09 April 2009
The US president's request would push the costs of the two wars
to almost $1 trillion.
US president Barack Obama is seeking $83.4bn (£56.8bn) for US military and
diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, pressing for special troop
funding that he opposed two years ago when he was a senator and George Bush was
president.
Obama's request, including money to send thousands more troops into
Afghanistan, would push the costs of the two wars to almost $1tn since the 9/11
terror attacks against the US in 2001, according to the Congressional Research
Service. The additional money would cover operations into the latter months of
this year.
Obama also is requesting $400m to upgrade security along the US-Mexico
border and to combat narcoterrorists.
Budget office spokesman Tom Gavin said the White House would send an
official request to Congress this afternoon. Congressional aides who had been
briefed on the request revealed its overall cost in advance.
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, acknowledged that Obama had
been critical of Bush's use of similar special legislation to pay for the wars.
He said it was needed this time because the money will be required by summer,
before Congress is likely to complete its normal appropriations process. "This
will be the last supplemental for Iraq and Afghanistan. The process by which
this has been funded over the course of the past many years, the president has
discussed and will change," Gibbs said.
The request is likely to win easy approval from the Democratic-controlled
Congress, despite frustration among some liberals over the pace of troop
withdrawals and Obama's plans for a large residual force of up to 50,000 troops,
about one-third of the total now, who will train Iraqis, protect US assets and
personnel and conduct anti-terror operations.
"The reality is the alternative to the supplemental is a sudden and
precipitous withdrawal of the United States from both places and I don't know
anybody who thinks that's a good idea," said US defence secretary Robert Gates.
"The reality is it would put everything we have achieved in Iraq at tremendous
risk, and I believe it would greatly endanger our troops."
"This funding will do two things: it will prolong our occupation of Iraq
through at least the end of 2011, and it will deepen and expand our military
presence in Afghanistan indefinitely," said Democratic anti-war Representative
Lynn Woolsey. "Instead of attempting to find military solutions to the problems
we face in Iraq and Afghanistan, President Obama must fundamentally change the
mission in both countries to focus on promoting reconciliation, economic
development, humanitarian aid and regional diplomatic efforts."
House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio predicted Republicans would
support the request overwhelmingly, provided congressional Democrats do not seek
to "micromanage" the war by adding a timeline or other restrictions on the
ability of military officials to carry on the fight.
He said the measure is required to pay for the new strategy in Afghanistan
and the drawdown of combat troops in Iraq. The White House plans for future war
expenses to be part of the annual legislation appropriating money for the
defence department.
Obama was a harsh critic of the Iraq war as a presidential candidate, which
attracted support from the Democratic party's liberal base and helped him secure
the party's nomination. He opposed two infusions of war money in 2007 after Bush
used a veto to force Congress to remove a withdrawal timeline from the $99bn
measure.
He supported a war-funding bill last year that also included about $25bn
for domestic programmes. Obama also voted for war funding in 2006, before he
announced his candidacy for president.
The coming request will include $75.8bn for the military and more than $7bn
in foreign aid. Pakistan, a key ally in the fight against al-Qaida, will receive
$400m in aid to combat insurgents.
The outlines of the request were provided in documents presented at a
private congressional briefing.
According to the documents, obtained by the Associated Press, the request
would pay for an average force level in Iraq of 140,000 troops, with force
levels in Afghanistan rising to 45,000. It would also provide $2.2bn to
accelerate into this year implementation of the Pentagon's plans to increase the
overall size of US forces, including a 547,400-person active duty US army.
The coming debate in Congress is likely to provide an early test of Obama's
efforts to remake the Pentagon and its much-criticised weapons procurement
system. He is requesting four F-22 fighter jets costing about $600m as part of
the war funding package but wants to shut the F-22 programme down after that.
The special measure would include $3.6bn for the Afghanistan national army.
The White House wants the bill for the president's signature by the
Memorial Day holiday, 25 May, said a Democratic aide in the House of
Representatives.
Obama announced plans in February to withdraw US troops from Iraq on a
19-month timetable, with the last service members out of Iraq by the end of 2011.
His new request would push the war money approved for 2009 to about $150bn.
The totals were $171bn for 2007 and $188bn for 2008, the year Bush increased the
tempo of military operations in a generally successful effort to quell the Iraq
insurgency.
http://www.truthout.org/041009L
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list