[Peace-discuss] Libertarian/Anarchist
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Wed Mar 11 01:06:31 CDT 2009
Man: What's the difference between "libertarian" and "anarchist," exactly?
Chomsky: There's no difference, really. I think they're the same thing. But you
see, "libertarian" has a special meaning in the United States. The United States
is off the spectrum of the main tradition in this respect: what's called
"libertarianism" here is unbridled capitalism. Now, that's always been opposed
in the European libertarian tradition, where every anarchist has been a
socialist—because the point is, if you have unbridled capitalism, you have all
kinds of authority: you have extreme authority.
If capital is privately controlled, then people are going to have to rent
themselves in order to survive. Now, you can say, "they rent themselves freely,
it's a free contract" -- but that's a joke. If your choice is, "do what I tell
you or starve," that's not a choice -- it's in fact what was commonly referred
to as wage slavery in more civilized times, like the eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries, for example.
The American version of "libertarianism" is an aberration, though nobody really
takes it seriously. I mean, everybody knows that a society that worked by
American libertarian principles would self-destruct in three seconds. The only
reason people pretend to take it seriously is because you can use it as a
weapon. Like, when somebody comes out in favor of a tax, you can say: "No, I'm a
libertarian, I'm against that tax" -- but of course, I'm still in favor of the
government building roads, and having schools, and killing Libyans, and all that
sort of stuff.
Now, there are consistent libertarians, people like Murray Rothbard -- and if
you just read the world that they describe, it's a world so full of hate that no
human being would want to live in it. This is a world where you don't have roads
because you don't see any reason why you should cooperate in building a road
that you're not going to use: if you want a road, you get together with a bunch
of other people who are going to use that road and you build it, then you charge
people to ride on it. If you don't like the pollution from somebody's
automobile, you take them to court and you litigate it. Who would want to live
in a world like that? It's a world built on hatred.
The whole thing's not even worth talking about, though. First of all, it
couldn't function for a second -- and if it could, all you'd want to do is get
out, or commit suicide or something. But this is a special American aberration,
it's not really serious.
(from Understanding Power)
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list