[Peace-discuss] Redbaiting & antiwar demos

[C. G. Estabrook]

[There was some discussion of these demos at tonight's meeting. --CGE]

	The Blackout of the March 21 Mobilizations
	Redbaiting on the Left
	By JOHN WALSH

The War on Iraq drags on with no clear end in sight.  The war on Afghanistan is 
being escalated.  The war on Pakistan has also been stepped up, a war undeclared 
by Congress, therefore unconstitutional and the basis for an impeachment.  All 
this has happened since Obama took office.

And yet with one exception, no national antiwar demonstration has been called. 
Worse, to a large degree the one demonstration called, for this coming weekend, 
March 21, has been blacked out on the “respectable Left.”  This ugly fact was 
brought home to me quite strikingly yesterday at a meeting of single-payer 
activists, most also antiwar activists.  No one with whom I spoke knew about the 
coming demonstration!  Part of the reason is that some have tried to 
characterize this action as a fringe event, because it has been called by 
A.N.S.W.E.R., about which more below and with which this writer is not affiliated.

This mobilization has a list of endorsers which are cannot readily be dismissed. 
For starters: Cindy Sheehan, Code Pink, Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW), 
Ron Kovic, Edward Asner, Mimi Kennedy, Ramsey Clark, School of the Americas 
Watch, San Francisco Labor Council (AFL-CIO) and many other labor locals as well 
as Green Party locals.

Despite this, the official peace movement, sock puppets of the Democrat Party, 
like MoveOn and UFPJ, is refusing to join or even to publicize this effort in 
any substantial way.

And this was predicted some time back by no less a monster than neocon 
McCarthyite David Horowitz who wrote in the Wall Street Journal not so many 
weeks ago as he gazed fondly on Obama’s inauguration:

     “Consider: When President Obama commits this nation to war against the 
Islamic terrorists, as he already has in Afghanistan, he will take millions of 
previously alienated and disaffected Americans with him, and they will support 
our troops in a way that most of his party has refused to support them until 
now. When another liberal, Bill Clinton went to war from the air, there was no 
anti-war movement in the streets or in his party's ranks to oppose him. That is 
an encouraging fact for us..."

And so it has come to pass.

Now some in UFPJ have characterized A.N.S.W.E.R. as loony lefties because a 
leading member is a group calling itself “Marxist-Leninist.”  Zowie, kids!  That 
is really scary!  I remind such people that Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther 
King were not deterred from allying with “Marxist-Leninists,” nor were any of 
those who joined in the fight against Nazism and Colonialism.  What is the big 
deal?  If A.N.S.W.E.R. is the only group willing to organize a loud and clear 
street opposition to the Obama version of war and empire, I for one will not be 
deterred from joining in by a pathetic bit of  redbaiting.  And if only those 
who call themselves “Marxists-Leninists” are willing to call such an action, 
then perhaps there is something in the wisdom of Marx, and Lenin, that remains 
of value.

So the question really is, Which side are you on?  That of the Obamanation and 
the Democrat Party version of war and empire?  Or on the side of public, mass 
opposition to the war? I hope that as many as possible choose the latter course 
– in D.C., L.A or S.F.

John Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar at gmail.com

http://www.counterpunch.org/walsh03162009.html