[Peace-discuss] Constitution Party position on anti-war
E. Wayne Johnson
ewj at pigs.ag
Fri May 22 11:03:23 CDT 2009
I mentioned at the last Aware meeting and again this week on Aware on
the Air that the Tea Party organizers here in Champaign-Urbana are with
the Constitution Party
and that the Constitution Party is anti-war.
Here is a segment from their platform statements to attest to that
statement.
*
*
*****
*Terrorism and Personal Liberty*
The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
Because we will refer to the fourth and fifth amendments, let's read
them in their entirety:
Amendment IV:
/"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be
seized."/
Amendment V:
/"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand
Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor
shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in
jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal
case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private
property be taken for public use, without just compensation."/
Note there is no exception to these rights provided for war or
public danger.
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2: /"The Privilege of the Writ of
Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of
Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."/
The threat of Terrorism has not been claimed to be a rebellion or an
invasion.
America is engaged in an undeclared war with an ill-defined enemy
(terrorism), a war which threatens to be never ending, and which is
being used to vastly expand government power, particularly that of the
executive branch, at the expense of the individual liberties of the
American people.
The "war on terrorism" is serving as an excuse for the government to
spend beyond its income, expand the Federal bureaucracy, and socialize
the nation through taxpayer bailouts of the airlines, subsidies to the
giant insurance corporations, and other Federal programs.
We deplore and vigorously oppose legislation and executive action that
deprive the people of their rights secured under the Fourth and Fifth
Amendments under the guise of "combating terrorism" or "protecting
national security." Examples of such legislation are the National
Security Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and the proposed Domestic Securities
Enhancement Act (colloquially known as "Patriot II"), and the Military
Commissions Act.
The National Security Act is used by the federal government as a shroud
to prevent the American people and our elected officials from knowing
how much and where our tax dollars are spent from covert operations
around the world. The National Security Act prevents the release of
Executive Orders and Presidential Decision Directives, e.g., PDD 25, to
the American people and our elected representatives. Not only are many
of these used to thwart justice in the name of national security, but
some of the operations under this act may threaten our very national
sovereignty.
The USA PATRIOT Act permits arrests without warrants and secret
detention without counsel, wiretaps without court supervision, searches
and seizures without notification to the individual whose property is
invaded, and a host of other violations of the legal safeguards our
nation has historically developed according to principles descending
from the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
Since we will no longer have a free nation while the federal government
(or the governments of the several states, as the federal government may
authorize) can violate our historic rights under such laws, we call for
the rejection of all such laws and the ceasing of any such further
proposals including the aforementioned Domestic Securities Enhancement Act.
The Constitution Party is unalterably opposed to the criminal acts of
terrorists, and their organizations, as well as the governments which
condone them. Individuals responsible for acts of terrorism must be
punished for their crimes, including the infliction of capital
punishment where appropriate. In responding to terrorism, however, these
United States must avoid acts of retaliation abroad which destroy
innocent human lives, creating enmity toward these United States and its
people; and
In accord with the views of our Founding Fathers, we must disengage this
nation from the international entanglements which generate foreign
hatred of these United States, and are used as the excuse for terrorist
attacks on America and its people. The 'war on terrorism" is not a
proper excuse for perpetual U.S. occupation of foreign lands, military
assaults on countries which have not injured us, or perpetual commitment
of taxpayer dollars to finance foreign governments.
****************
Since World War II, these United States has been involved in tragic,
unconstitutional, undeclared wars which cost our country the lives of
many thousands of young Americans. These wars were the direct and
foreseeable result of the bi-partisan interventionist policy of both
Democrat and Republican administrations.
The Constitution Party is opposed to the continuation of the same
interventionist policy, with that policy's capacity to involve our
country in repeated wars.
We demand that:
* never again shall United States troops be employed on any foreign
field of battle without a declaration of war by Congress, as
required by the United States Constitution;
* Congress refuse to fund unconstitutional, undeclared wars pursuant
to presidential whim or international obligations under which
American sovereignty has been transferred to multi-national agencies.
Foreign Involvement:
The Constitution Party has consistently opposed American involvement in
conflicts in the Middle East, Africa, Asia, Europe, and Central and
South America. These United States has no interest in these areas which
would justify the sacrifice of Americans on foreign battlefields - nor
is our country properly cast as a merchant of death in international
arms races.
We propose that these United States:
* repudiate any commitment, express or implied, to send U.S. troops
to participate in foreign conflicts, whether unilaterally, under
NATO auspices, or as a part of the United Nations "peace-keeping"
operations; and
* cease financing, or arming of belligerents in the world's troubled
areas.
********
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20090522/b917340e/attachment.html
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list