[Peace-discuss] president's speech on afghanistan (correction)
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Thu Nov 12 09:10:02 CST 2009
Yes. Perhaps it illustrates how seriously we should take grammatical rules.
John W. wrote:
> Actually, Carl, it should be "Damn'd be HE that first cries...",
> shouldn't it? Have we caught Shakespeare in a grammatical error?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:39 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu
> <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>> wrote:
>
> "You got to know when to hold them, know when to fold them,
> Know when to walk away and know when to run..." --CGE
>
>
> John W. wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:13 PM, C. G. Estabrook
> <galliher at illinois.edu <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>
> <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>>>
> wrote:
>
> Sorry. I made a grammatical point and then committed a solecism
> of my own.
>
> Read "But do we risk praising killing just some people?"
>
>
> Yes. And damn'd be him that first cries, "Hold enough?"!
>
>
>
>
> C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>
> This is a poem. (But you mean "As if ... were ...")
>
> But do we risk praising just killing some people?
>
> "And damn'd be him that first cries, 'Hold, enough!'?"
>
>
> Karen Medina wrote:
>
> won't get his 40,000 troops but only, say 10,000 -- and maybe
> only trainers? Would we be seen as applauding presidential
> restraint?
>
>
>
> Short of withdrawal, I am in favor of rallying.
>
> 10,000 trainers. As if our military had an answer. And if they
> had an answer,
> as if our military could train without knowing the language and
> the culture. And if they knew the languages and the cultures, as
> if there were people to
> train. ... As if!
>
> As if the problem was in Afghanistan. As if the problem was
> isolated. As if
> the problem was contained or containable. As if the problem had
> a beginning .
> As if the problem was identified and spoken honestly of. As if.
>
> -karen medina
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:17 PM, C. G. Estabrook
> <galliher at illinois.edu <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>
> <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>>>
> wrote:
>
> A good idea -- but what do we do if the administration chooses
> one of the "four options" (from its present propaganda blitz)
> that would say McChrystal
>
>
> Tim Johnson seems to be committed to a demand for withdrawal,
> and I would presume would continue to be so, regardless of what
> Obama does, short of withdrawal. That would seem to me to be
> the basis on which to organize a rally.
>
>
> Robert Naiman wrote:
>
> press speculation would suggest better than even odds that
> sometime in November, the President will give a speech
> announcing that he intends to send
> tens of thousands of more troops to Afghanistan in 2010.
>
> I propose to spread around in advance the idea that there will be a
> demonstration at the Vets Memorial in Urbana at 5pm the day of
> the president's speech.
>
> the idea of 5pm the day of the speech is to try to get into the
> president's
> news cycle. so that when people are watching the local tv news,
> the first
> thing they see is the president's announcement and the second
> thing they see
> is the local reaction: "but local protesters say that escalation
> is not the
> answer."
>
> I furthermore propose that we invite Tim Johnson to speak. he's
> rock-solid on
> this. now that's man bites dog.
>
>
>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list