[Peace-discuss] Fwd: Catholic Bishops Enact Plan For “300,000 Terri Sch iavos”
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Sat Nov 28 13:48:08 CST 2009
This minor bit of anti-Catholic propaganda from the spokesperson of an advocacy group (advocacy for what it doesn't say, but it's clear enough) ignores the fact that Catholic organizations have long opposed starving people to death because someone else didn't approve of their "quality of life" (as in Schiavo's case).
(I was happy to see at the time that that was also Ralph Nader's position.) --CGE
---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:19:28 -0600
>From: "Morton K. Brussel" <brussel at illinois.edu>
>Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Fwd: Catholic Bishops Enact Plan For “300,000 Terri Sch iavos”
>To: Jenifer Cartwright <jencart13 at yahoo.com>
>Cc: Peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>
> Sickening. --mkb
> On Nov 28, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jenifer Cartwright
> wrote:
>
> FireDogLake
>
> Catholic Bishops Enact Plan For “300,000 Terri Schiavos”
>
> By: David Dayen Tuesday November 24, 2009 8:16 am
>
> The US Conference of Catholic Bishops released an “Ethical and
> Religious Directive” this month that would ban any Catholic hospital,
> nursing home or hospice program from removing feeding tubes or ending
> palliative procedures of any kind, even when the individual has an
> advance directive to guide their end-of-life care. The Bishops’
> directive even notes that patient suffering is redemptive and brings
> the individual closer to Christ.
>
> The Catholic bishops have become more involved in political fights in
> recent years, particularly the issue of abortion coverage and
> immigration provisions in the current health care debate. This has
> caused a schism in the American Catholic community, which bubbled to a
> head yesterday with Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI) being denied communion
> because of his position on choice.
>
> More quietly, however, the Church has staked out a radical position on
> end-of-life care, without patients of the 565 Catholic hospitals and
> other Catholic care facilities even knowing about it. As Barbara
> Coombs Lee, president of Compassion and Choices, an advocacy group,
> put it, “When a patient goes to one of these facilities, they don’t
> know that they’re choosing Catholic dogma. The bishops see the
> hospitals as an extension of their ministry.”
>
> The “Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care
> Services” put out by the Catholic bishops would build upon a Papal
> allocution given in the wake of the controversial Terri Schiavo case,
> where the US Congress stepped in to keep Schiavo alive despite her
> persistent vegetative state and the wishes of her husband to end care.
> The papal elocution did state that the permanently unconscious should
> always have access to a feeding tube, but it did not have the force of
> doctrinal law behind it. “There was always some wiggle room” for
> Catholic care facilities, said Coombs Lee. Catholics were allowed to
> use something called a “benefit/burden balance” to determine the
> ethical, moral and compassionate result in any individual case.
>
> Now, that wiggle room is gone. In the new directive, the bishops state
> that it is unethical and immoral to withhold or withdraw a feeding
> tube from patients, whether in cases of permanent unconsciousness,
> comas, or even cases of advanced dementia when the patient is unable
> to feed themselves.
>
> This substitutes the wishes of the bishops for the stated wishes of
> families and the patients themselves, said Coombs Lee. Even if the
> family can produce an advance directive or living will, Catholic
> hospitals and nursing homes would be expected to maintain the feeding
> tubes. In addition, all Catholic health care workers are required by
> their faith to continue palliative care, according to the document.
> The directive even addresses patients. “These are directives for you,
> from the church,” said Coombs Lee.
>
> In many cities, this means that every hospital or medical care
> facility will not allow the withdrawal of a feeding tube. “In Spokane,
> Washington, if you don’t get Catholic health care, you don’t get
> health care,” Coombs Lee said. “In Eugene, Oregon, if you don’t get
> Catholic health care, you don’t get health care.” Coombs Lee
> characterized it as a kind of entrapment, with a sense of “my house,
> my rules.” If a patient’s family wanted to comply with an advance
> directive, they would have to leave the Catholic care facility, adding
> a level of stress and disruption to the already difficult time of
> aggrievement. “Decisions on feeding tubes are hard enough without
> adding this extra adversity,” said Coombs Lee.
>
> Coombs Lee believes that this could create “300,000 Terri Schiavo
> cases,” the number being equal to the number of feeding tubes inserted
> in the United States each year.
>
> The Catholic Hospital Association disagrees. Their statement
> responding to the Bishops’ Ethical and Religious Directive says that:
>
> However, the Directive explains that this obligation ceases and the
> measures become “morally optional” when the measures cannot reasonably
> be expected to prolong the patient’s life or when they become
> excessively burdensome. (This provision incorporates into the
> Directive the teaching of Pope John Paul II and the Congregation for
> the Doctrine of the Faith regarding medically assisted nutrition and
> hydration to persons in a persistent vegetative state. Catholic health
> care facilities have already addressed the implications of these
> statements).
>
> The Directive also distinguishes between patients in a chronic state
> and those who are dying. This distinction has implications for the use
> of medically administered nutrition and hydration. For dying patients,
> medically administered nutrition and hydration may no longer be of
> benefit and may, in fact, impose significant burdens.
>
> Compassion & Choices says that this language distinguishing between
> those cases where artificial nutrition is “excessively burdensome”
> appears nowhere in the Bishops’ directive. Furthermore, while the CHA
> says the directive only applies to those patients being kept alive by
> a feeding tube, that is precisely their function. As Coombs Lee puts
> it, “Feeding tubes keep people in chronic states like PVS and advanced
> dementia alive… Feeding tubes are not indicated for people actively
> dying and they are rarely inserted in any institution, Catholic or
> not.”
>
> A 60Minutes piece this weekend looked at the cost of dying in America,
> showing that Medicare paid $50 billion in the last two months of
> patients’ lives in 2008. Compassion & Choices focuses on the suffering
> at the end of life, not federal dollars, but they agree in general
> with the portrait shown by 60 Minutes. Incredibly, suffering is one of
> the selling points in the Catholic Bishops’ directive. “It’s quite
> specific about the role of suffering in Christian dogma,” Coombs Lee
> explained. “It says that suffering is redemptive, that it’s part of
> Christ’s passion. So they are pretty clear on their concern for the
> suffering of the patient.”
>
> The end of life issue became very controversial in the health care
> debate, over fears that Congress was creating so-called “death
> panels.” However, these secret “suffering panels” put in by Catholic
> hospitals are being done without much fanfare at all. “People need to
> know,” said Coombs Lee, “when they commit themselves to a hospital,
> that they are submitting to a Catholic ministry, in the eyes of the
> Bishops.”
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>________________
>_______________________________________________
>Peace-discuss mailing list
>Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list