[Peace-discuss] Why is the Obama administration killing people?

[Ricky Baldwin]

As you often say, you just can't make this stuff up.

Ricky

"Speak your mind even if your voice shakes." - Maggie Kuhn

--- On Wed, 10/7/09, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu> wrote:


From: C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu>
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Why is the Obama administration killing people?
To: "Ricky Baldwin" <baldwinricky at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Peace-discuss" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 11:15 AM


Yes. Yesterday.

The USG refused to negotiate with the Afghan government over the extradition of Bin Laden & Co. -- and attacked the country instead -- because it was less interested in prosecuting al-Qaeda than in using 9/11 as an excuse for the continuation of its long-standing policy of domination of the region.

The 9/11 Commission report reveals the wide range of places the USG considered attacking after 9/11.  (The remarkable Douglas Feith suggested bombing South America "because they won't be expecting that" -- IANMTU.)


Ricky Baldwin wrote:
> ... "less sophisticated" meaning "less convoluted" presumably ... By the way,
> it's worth remembering that the taliban didn't "refuse" to turn over
> al-Qaeda, strictly speaking.  They said it would be difficult to find them,
> but they would try if the US supplied the evidence against them.  Bush's
> sophisticated answer: "We don't need evidence.  We already KNOW they're
> guilty."  Faced with such irresistable logic, who could "refuse"?  Only those
> whose acceptance would not be, well, accepted.
> 
> We really need out of there.  Yesterday.
> 
> 
> --- On *Wed, 10/7/09, C. G. Estabrook /<galliher at illinois.edu>/* wrote:
> 
> 
> [The Obama administration's justification for killing people in AfPak
> ("stopping terrorism") is so transparent -- less sophisticated in fact than
> the previous administration's case for killing people in Iraq -- as to reveal
> a contempt for real political discussion in the US.  Obama wrote,
> outrageously, that the biggest casualty of Vietnam war was "the bond of trust
> between the American people and their government." But he is attempting to
> establish that "bond of trust" now by lying, not by being candid about what
> his administration is doing.  The rest of the world knows that we're in AfPak
> to "deny terrorists a safe haven" in the sense that "terrorists" are those
> who oppose US military domination of the Mideast.  --CGE]
> 
> October 07 2009 Afghan Taliban say they pose no threat to the West By Sayed
> Salahuddin Reuters
> 
> KABUL (Reuters) - The Afghan Taliban pose no threat to the West but will
> continue their fight against occupying foreign forces, they said on
> Wednesday, the eighth anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion that removed them
> from power.
> 
> U.S.-led forces with the help of Afghan groups overthrew the Taliban government during a five week battle which started on October 7, 2001, after
> the militants refused to hand over al Qaeda leaders wanted by Washington for
> the September 11 attacks on America.
> 
> "We had and have no plan of harming countries of the world, including those
> in Europe ... our goal is the independence of the country and the building of
> an Islamic state," the Taliban said in a statement on the group's website
> www.shahamat.org.
> 
> "Still, if you (NATO and U.S. troops) want to colonize the country of proud
> and pious Afghans under the baseless pretext of a war on terror, then you
> should know that our patience will only increase and that we are ready for a
> long war."
> 
> U.S. President Barack Obama has said defeating the militants in Afghanistan
> and Pakistan is a top foreign policy priority and is evaluating whether to
> send thousands of extra troops to the country as requested by the commander
> of NATO and U.S. forces.
> 
> In a review of the war in Afghanistan submitted to the Pentagon last month,
> U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, in charge of all foreign forces, said
> defeating the insurgents would likely result in failure unless more troops
> were sent.
> 
> There are currently more than 100,000 foreign troops in the country, roughly
> two-thirds of who are Americans.
> 
> SAFE HAVEN
> 
> The Taliban statement comes at a time when Western officials warn that
> deserting Afghanistan could mean a return to power for the Taliban and the
> country could once again become a safe haven for al Qaeda militants, who
> could use it as a base to plan future attacks on Western countries.
> 
> The Taliban have made a comeback in recent years, spreading their attacks to
> previously secure areas. The growing insecurity has further added to the
> frustration of ordinary Afghans with the West and President Hamid Karzai's
> government, in power since the Taliban's ouster.
> 
> Since 2001, each year, several thousand Afghans, many of them civilians, have
> been killed in Afghanistan, with Taliban and al Qaeda leaders still at large
> despite the rising number of foreign troops.
> 
> In the statement, the Taliban said the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan for its
> refusal to hand over al Qaeda leaders, was hasty and unjustified. Washington
> had not given leaders of the movement any proof to show the involvement of al
> Qaeda in the September 11 attacks, it said.
> 
> Washington was using the so-called war on terror in Afghanistan and in Iraq
> as part of its expansionist goals in the Middle East, central and southeast
> Asia, it said.
> 
> It recalled the defeat of British forces in the 19th century and the fate of
> the former Soviet Union in the 1980s in Afghanistan as a lesson to those
> nations who have troops in the country.
> 
> Qari Mohammad Yousuf, a spokesman for the Taliban, said the withdrawal of
> foreign troops was the only solution to a conflict that has grown in
> intensity and has pushed some European nations to refuse to send their
> soldiers into battle zones or to speak about a timetable to withdraw from the
> country.
> 
> Some 1,500 foreign troops have also died in Afghanistan since the Taliban's
> ouster causing many nations to question the presence of its soldiers in the
> country and whether stability can ever be achieved eight years after the
> overthrow of the militants.




      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20091007/7053b8bc/attachment.htm