[Peace-discuss] The president is in the trunk

[C. G. Estabrook]

	Sep 25, 2009
	The president is in the trunk
	By Pepe Escobar

An historical irony has placed little Honduras at the eye of the volcano in both 
the United Nations General Assembly in New York and the Group of 20 (G-20) 
meeting in Pittsburgh this week - even though United States corporate media 
would rather focus on Libyan Muammar Gaddafi and the tribulations of his 
traveling tent. [1]

As much as the 2008 financial crisis exposed the economic fallacy of 
US-propelled neo-liberalism, the June 28 oligarch-directed military coup in 
Honduras has exposed the fallacy of the Barack Obama administration's pledge to 
uphold democratic values around the world. Stolen elections in Afghanistan? We 
don't like it, but... Military coup in Honduras? We don't like it, but...

What passes for official US policy at the G-20 consists of telling big exporting 
powers such as China, Germany and Japan to engage in an orgy of consumption (as 
the US used to) while vaguely promising the US will finally boost savings. Fat 
chance.

As for Honduras, this is now the Obama administration's hour of truth: will it 
finally come clean and follow world opinion - also expressed by the UN, the 
European Union and the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) - in condemning 
and isolating the coup plotters?

The stick, or deafening silence
Deposed, rightful Honduran President Manuel Zelaya has been to Washington no 
less than six times since the coup. Not once was he allowed to meet Obama. Then, 
this past Monday morning, Zelaya showed up at the Brazilian Embassy in 
Tegucigalpa, Honduras' capital, after a spectacular run that started in 
Nicaragua, involved a flight to El Salvador on a plane offered by Venezuela, and 
a 15-hour odyssey across the border to Honduras on foot and by car, evading 
myriad checkpoints manned by local intelligence - which is, crucially, funded, 
trained and maintained by the Pentagon. Zelaya was smuggled into the Brazilian 
Embassy in the trunk of car.

Zelaya may have had help from Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez, under the 
umbrella of the Bolivarian Alternative of the Americas (ALBA). But now the 
strategic game-changer has been to shift the attention towards Brazil - and that 
means under the UNASUR.

Whether Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva knew it before hand or 
only at the last minute (as the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs insists) 
is irrelevant. It was not the US that called for an emergency meeting of the UN 
Security Council this week; it was Brazil.

Lula forcefully demanded the restoration of democracy in Honduras in his speech 
at the UN General Assembly - with strong applause from the plenary. Obama's 
speech came right after Lula's. Not a word on Honduras. Obama spoke of a "new 
era of engagement" or at best an "inter-connected world" - while Lula spoke 
about the emergence of a real multilateral world; its subtext means the 
hyperpower does not have the monopoly anymore, be it on the word, the stick, or 
deafening silence.

Obama even stressed the US "can't fix it alone" - as if the war in Afghanistan 
and confrontation with Iran were global, and not only US, obsessions. (By the 
way: Lula met Iran's President Mahmud Ahmadinejad face-to-face for over an hour 
on the sidelines of the UN assembly. He later said that as much as Brazil had 
the right to develop its own peaceful nuclear program, so did Iran).

By Obama's own admission, the US can't fix Honduras alone, but at least it could 
have emitted the right signals, delegitimizing the coup politically, militarily, 
economically and diplomatically from the beginning.

So far, the US-dominated Organization of American States (OAS) has engaged in a 
pantomime negotiated by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias which calls for 
Zelaya's return as president, coup plotters integrated into the government, and 
amnesty for everybody, including installed coup President Roberto Micheletti.

This is ludicrous. It's as if in the (failed) George W Bush 
administration-supported 2002 coup against Chavez in Venezuela, the plotters 
would have been allowed to stay as his ministers.

Only the minimal Honduran oligarchy and the media they control support the coup. 
They have no social base. A communique by the National Front Against the Coup 
stresses that some businessmen and military who initially supported the plotters 
are now leaving the country. The coup plotters - emboldened by force, as if this 
was Latin America in the 1970s all over again - reverted to, what else, mass 
repression, a state of siege and tear-gassing everyone in sight.

What the majority of the people in Honduras want is their rightful president 
back in power and a constituent assembly, for which they are campaigning all 
around the country. Zelaya's own counter-coup has been to risk his life and 
install a government in exile - but not in exile, inside his own country - the 
ultimate nightmare of any dictatorship. For the coup plotters, there are only 
two endgames: unleash state terrorism or get out of Dodge and beg for asylum in 
Panama.

The Pentagon power play
Washington's glaring ambiguity is easily attributed to the ongoing, fierce 
internal war in the US. The true US supporters of the coup in Honduras are US 
Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) and the State Department. But even Secretary of 
State Hillary Clinton has been forced to back down. On Monday, she finally was 
forced to admit "the remainder of President Zelaya's term [is] to be respected".

Crucially, Obama has to know how the ambiguous US stance on Honduras is a dagger 
pointing to his heart. It leaves his lofty promise of a new relationship between 
the US and Latin America in tatters. Worse still, it unveils how helpless he is 
facing his - in theory - subordinates at the Pentagon and the State Department, 
no to mention vast reactionary forces across the US for whom multilateralism 
means a surrender to "socialism" and to America's enemies.

As American political activist, author and lecturer Noam Chomsky has pointed 
out, Central America is still traumatized by the "Reaganesque terror" of the 
1980s. In a wider context in Latin America, the US used to exert control either 
by hardcore violence, direct or indirect, or by applying an economic 
stranglehold. This belongs to the past - as much as coup lovers in the Pentagon 
may regret it.

Coups, anyway, are far from gone. The Bush administration tried (and failed) in 
Venezuela in 2002; now Washington engages in subversion/propaganda via an 
extensive media network and National Endowment for Democracy-style support for 
the disgruntled local oligarchies. In Haiti, both France and the US got rid of 
the government and sent the president to South Africa. Honduras is a more 
complex case. The International Monetary Fund has just approved an enormous loan 
to Honduras - which will cover for the lack of direct US "assistance".

Most of all, the US role in Honduras is a Pentagon-playing-the-New Great Game 
matter. The coup is intimately linked to ongoing remilitarization of Latin 
America - from the reactivation of the dormant Fourth Fleet to the installation 
of seven new military bases in Colombia. (See US's 'arc of instability' just 
gets bigger, September 3, Asia Times Online.)

In pure Pentagonese, Honduras under Zelaya fell under the good old Cold War 
domino theory. The government had to go because it was linked to ALBA, which 
means Nicaragua and, above all, Venezuela. Chavez is playing a high stakes New 
Great Game - he just bought US$2 billion in weapons from Russia at a time when 
Moscow wants access to the Orinoco oil wealth, and he is also doing energy 
megadeals with China. The Pentagonese response is an array of bases in Colombia 
to monitor him. Now Zelaya's move to the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa 
introduces an even juicier element.

Last December, Brazil struck a strategic military partnership with France - 
involving a multibillion-dollar purchase of submarines, helicopters and jet 
fighters - with full technology transfer included. Lula is privileging the 
French over Boeing - and obviously the US industrial-military complex is not 
amused. Brazil projects power independently from the US and France in South 
America. This is all about multilateralism in action - of the kind reactionary 
forces in the US simply abhor.

Brazil is a key G-20 member at the Pittsburgh summit - the largest economy in 
Latin America, swinging its way towards great power status, and still a key ally 
and trading partner of the US. Brazil may not solve the crisis in Honduras. But 
Lula - whom Obama immensely respects - may convince him it's time to finally 
come clean, and side with the people of Honduras.

This might do wonders for Obama's global credibility - especially now that he 
has seemingly backed down on his demand for a freeze on Israeli settlements on 
the West Bank and East Jerusalem. (See Netanyahu and Obama: Who's fooling who?, 
Asia Times Online, September 24)

Were Obama not to make his move, the impression would remain that if he can't 
even control his own reactionary/militarist backyard in Washington, not to 
mention Latin America, how will he face up to Russia and China on the global stage?

Note
1. Known for pitching a large Bedouin tent on his trips abroad, Gaddafi this 
time pitched it on famous US entrepreneur Donald Trump's 86 hectare (213 acre) 
estate in Bedford, a town about 50 kilometers north of New York, after New York 
police turned down his request to erect it in Central Park.

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is 
Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot 
of Baghdad during the surge. His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan 
(Nimble Books, 2009).

He may be reached at pepeasia at yahoo.com.