[Peace-discuss] Policing the debate
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Sun Sep 27 21:19:44 CDT 2009
Frank Rich has a disgusting piece in the NYT today, and attempt to establish the
limits of allowable debate for Obama's Great Decision on Afghanistan.
What are the (only) alternatives? McChrystal or Biden. God help us.
McChrystal -- tens of thousands more US troops; Biden -- air war against our
real enemy in the region, Pakistan.
On the way, Rich makes the liberal's favorite move about Vietnam. He contends,
quite ahistorically, that it was Johnson who "Americanized" that war. Kennedy
was conflicted and innocent. that's hogwash, as anyone who wants to look at
the historical record will conclude. The invasion of South Vietnam (where the
war was fought) occurred in 1962, while Kennedy was alive.
The point of the piece is to delegitimatize the only non-criminal path for the
US, the withdrawal of its troops (and mercenaries, corporations, etc.) from the
region.
"Invading armies have no rights, only responsibilities. Among them are
the responsibility to pay reparations for their crimes, and to hold the guilty
accountable. A crucial responsibility is to pay careful attention to the will
of the victims. The decision to withdraw does not lie in the hands of the
invaders. That should be elementary." --Noam Chomsky
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list