[Peace-discuss] The US lies and tortures children

[C. G. Estabrook]

	Published on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 by Salon.com
	War Propaganda from Afghanistan
	by Glenn Greenwald

The New York Times yesterday excitedly declared that the imminent Battle of 
Kandahar "has become the make-or-break offensive of the eight-and-half-year 
[Afghanistan] war" and is "the pivotal test of President Obama's Afghanistan 
strategy."  As Atrios suggests, there never is any such thing as "make-or-break" 
because we never leave no matter how completely our war and occupation efforts 
fail.  That's what led to the countless Friedman Units of the Iraq War:  the 
endless proclamations that The Next Six Months will be Decisive, only to be 
repeated at the end of the six-month period of failure as though the prior one 
never happened.

Just consider what's being said now about how the Kandahar offensive is the 
"make-or-break" battle of the war and the "pivotal test" for Obama's war 
strategy by comparing it to what was said a mere two months ago about the now 
clearly failing assault on Marjah:

Times of London, February 13, 2010:

"Allied troops launched a major offensive into Afghanistan's most violent 
province last night, in a key part of President Obama's push to seize control of 
the Taleban's last big stronghold. . . . If it fails, many analysts believe that 
the war will be lost."

The Independent declared on February 9, 2010, that General McChrystal wants the 
Marjah offensive to "be one of the most significant in the country since the 
fall of the Taliban in 2001" and, of Obama's war strategy, said that "Marjah 
looks like being its first major -- and possibly decisive -- test."  The BBC 
quoted a NATO official who proclaimed that Marjah "was 'probably the definitive 
operation' of the counter-insurgency strategy" and "this operation could 
potentially define the tipping point, the crucial momentum aspect in the 
counter-insurgency."  Time helpfully informed us that "U.S. officials believe it 
will mark a turning point in the war."

Now that that "make-or-break decisive test" has failed (or, at best, has 
produced very muddled outcomes), did the Government and media follow through and 
declare the war effort broken and the strategy a failure?  No; they just pretend 
it never happened and declare the next, latest, glorious Battle the real 
"make-or-break decisive test" -- until that one fails and the next one is 
portrayed that way, in an endless tidal wave of war propaganda intended to 
justify our staying for as long as we want, no matter how pointless and 
counter-productive it is.

* * * * *

Speaking of war propaganda, today is a very proud day for the U.S.:  the 
military commission ordered by Eric Holder begins for Omar Khadr, a 
Canadian-born, Afghanistan-residing detainee encaged at Guantanamo for seven 
years -- since he was 15 years old -- on "war crimes" and "terrorism" charges 
that he was involved in a firefight with American military forces who, 
revealingly enough, were using a former Soviet military base as their outpost. 
Khadr was wounded in the battle, imprisoned at Bagram, then at Guantanamo, 
claims he was severely tortured into falsely confessing, and made worldwide news 
when a video of him weeping, begging for medical help, and crying for his mother 
during an interrogation was released.  Apparently, if the U.S. Army invades a 
foreign country, anyone who fights against that invading force -- including a 
15-year-old boy -- is a "war criminal" and a "Terrorist," even the Worst of The 
Worst, which is, of course, all that we're currently holding at Guantanamo.  Now 
that's some robust propaganda.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/04/27-8


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.