[Peace-discuss] bzzzt.
E. Wayne Johnson
ewj at pigs.ag
Tue Aug 10 12:56:40 CDT 2010
*Imperial Cancer*
by Jacob G. Hornberger
With the welfare state cracking apart and with rising concerns among the
citizenry about federal spending and debt, count on federal officials to
provoke more overseas crises as a way to frighten people into rallying
toward the government. It is an old tried-and-true trick that government
officials use to distract people's attention away from the problems
government is causing and toward supporting the government's efforts to
keep people "safe."
U.S. officials are not the only ones who have used this trick
effectively. James Madison pointed out that officials in the Roman
Empire did it too: "Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a
war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the
armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people."
In the war on terrorism, fear is the coin of the realm. "Be afraid, be
very afraid" has become the standard catcall of the statists.
One option, of course, is for the citizenry to resist the fearmongering
and steadfastly oppose all governmental efforts to infringe liberty and
privacy in the name of keeping people safe. The problem with that
approach, however, is that it can be endless since the government can
use its forces to provoke new overseas threats whenever it wants. It can
do things constantly to keep the people afraid.
Therefore, the only real long-tern solution is to dismantle America's
disastrous experment with empire, interventionism, and a warfare state.
That would entail an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iraq,
bringing all the troops home from everywhere around the world and
discharging them, closing most of the military bases here in the United
States, ending all foreign aid, and ridding our nation of a standing army.
That was the type of nation --- a constitutional republic --- our
American ancestors intended for America to be. By embracing empire and
foreign interventionism (and a welfare state), America has deviated from
the vision that the Founding Fathers had for our nation, and the results
have been disastrous.
Think of the advantages that would acrue from exiting Afghanistan, Iraq,
and the rest of the Middle East and the world, and from dismantling the
entire U.S. military empire::
1. The biggest benefit would be that the threat of terrorism against the
United States would evaporate. That's where motive is so important. From
the get-go, U.S. officials wanted Americans to believe that the 9/11
terrorists attacked America because they hated our freedom and values.
Nonsense. The attacks were "blowback" or retaliation for the bad things
the U.S. government was doing in the Middle East.
The empire-intervention crowd claims that the Empire must remain
occupying Afghanistan indefinitely to ensure that the Taliban doesn't
regain power. They say that the Taliban might make Afghanistan into a
haven for more 9/11-type terrorists.
But that's just nonsense. For one thing, the U.S. didn't attack
Afghanistan because the Taliban were complicit in the 9/11 attacks. It
attacked because the Taliban refused to unconditionally comply with
President Bush's demand to deliver bin Laden to the CIA.
Thus, the fear that drives statists to call for a permanent occupation
of Afghanistan is that the Taliban must now be so angry over what the
U.S. Empire did to them that they migth want to retaliate by offering a
base from which terrorists can initiate strikes against the United States.
But that's just speculation and empire talk. There is no reason to
believe that the Taliban will engage in such actions after the U.S.
Empire exits the country. After all, do we see any terrorist strikes
against Russia despite the fact that the Soviet Union wreaked untold
death and destruction during its occupation of Afghanistan. Do we see
any terorist strkes against the United States by North Vietnamese people
who lost friends and relatives from U.S. bombs and bullets during the
Vietnam War?
Moreover, since terrorism against the United States is rooted in what
the U.S. government is doing over there, once the U.S. government is no
longer over there, there won't be any more terrorist threat against the
United States. In other words, what difference would it make if the
Taliban were to announce Afghanistan as a haven for terrorists if nobody
cared anymore about planning terrorist strikes agaisnt the United States?
Anyway, as we've seen time and time again, people who are determined to
do harm to the United States can plan terrorist strikes from a hotel or
house anywhere in the world. They don't need an entire country to serve
as a safe haven for them.
2. With the anger and hatred that gives rise to terrorism having
dissipated, the entire war-on-terrorism edifice could be dismantled,
beginning with the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security.
Life could return to normal, without all the perpetual crises and
fear-mongering.
3. An enormous amount of taxpayer money could be saved, perhaps as much
as 1/3 of the federal budget.
When a person is stricken by cancer, it's important to attack the source
of the cancer cells. The same principle applies to when the body politic
is attacked by cancer. The source of America's cancer is the U.S.
Empire. It's time to attack the cancer at its source by bringing all the
troops and contractors home now, dismantling Americas' military empire,
and ending its foreign policy of meddling and interference. That would
go a long way toward restoring health to our nation, along with peace,
prosperity, harmony, and normality.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100811/25002e5c/attachment.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list