[Peace-discuss] FBI investigates Chicago Jewish woman for traveling to Palestine
Robert Naiman
naiman.uiuc at gmail.com
Thu Dec 16 07:31:26 CST 2010
Smith’s father, Stan Smith, added “I think Patrick Fitzgerald, the US
District Attorney, Robert Parker of the FBI need to see my daughter and her
friends and apologize to them. And I think President Obama, who was elected
in 2008 because he said he would stop this sort of thing, should make a
point on his next trip to Chicago to personally apologize to my daughter and
her friends for how his government is intimidating them.”
*"MuzzleWatch <http://feedblitz.com/r.asp?l=48945970&f=150615&u=5786813&c=0>
"* - 1 new article
1. Been to Israel/Palestine lately? The FBI may come knocking on your
door.<http://us.mc1803.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome?.partner=sbc&.gx=1&.tm=1292472052&.rand=917c1fpi22r68#150615_0>
2. More Recent
Articles<http://us.mc1803.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome?.partner=sbc&.gx=1&.tm=1292472052&.rand=917c1fpi22r68#150615_recap>
3. Search MuzzleWatch <http://www.feedblitz.com/f?Search=150615>
4. Prior Mailing Archive <http://archive.feedblitz.com/150615>
*Been to Israel/Palestine lately? The FBI may come knocking on your
door.<http://feedblitz.com/r.asp?l=52386045&f=150615&u=5786813&c=0>
*
By the time she was in high school, Sarah Smith had already been named one
of the 100 most influential women in Chicago by Chicago’s business magazine,
Crain’s. Now Smith, who happens to be Jewish, has been subpoenaed by the FBI
to appear before a grand jury on January
25<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://www.stopfbi.net/2010/12/3/fbi-delivers-subpoenas-more-anti-war-solidarity-activists-chicago>to
explain her trip to Israel-Palestine with two Palestinian women
friends.
(As terrifying as this whole episode is for everyone involved, it says
something about Palestinian safety that only Smith has come forward
publicly.) All three young Chicago residents have been subpoenaed, joining
ranks with 14 other peace
activists<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://www.stopfbi.net/about/profiles>from
the Midwest who have been similarly targeted in recent months.
Here is Sarah Smith’s full
statement<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://colorado.indymedia.org/node/7976>from
a December 6 press conference:
Friday morning, December 3, I received a phone call from an FBI agent. He
asked if I had about 30 minutes to sit down and speak with him so he could
ask me some questions. I asked about what and he said he “was not at liberty
to discuss it.” I then asked if I needed a lawyer present and he said it was
up to me but that I was not in any trouble and that they just had a few
questions.
I felt something suspicious about him telling me he wanted to ask me some
questions, but he would not tell me what these questions were. So I said
that I had to consult a lawyer and check my schedule and that I would get
back to him. I reiterated that it would be easier for me to meet him if I
knew why an FBI agent wanted to sit down with me. He then said that it had
to deal with the trip I took this summer. He then emphasized, “I think you
know which one I’m talking about.”
The trip I took last summer was to Israel and Palestine. I am Jewish and
wanted to see first hand what life is like for Israelis and Palestinians. If
I went on the standard tour to Israel, I would not be shown how Palestinians
live. So I went on a tour that showed me both worlds, Israel, and the
Israeli occupied Palestinian West Bank. I went with 2 Palestinian-American
friends. You would think Jews and Palestinians going together to visit
Israel and Palestine is something the U.S. government would encourage.
Instead, we are now being ordered by the FBI to go before a Grand Jury for
going on that trip. The US government says it supports peace between Israel
and Palestine. It says it supports separate Israeli and Palestinian states.
So why does the FBI investigate us because we went to see the Palestinian
land? Top US government leaders meet with Palestinian leaders, so why does
the FBI investigate us because we talked to average Palestinians on the
street?
I went there so I could make up my own mind and talk about what I saw. It
seems to me our government wants to hide what Israel is doing to
Palestinians. I would like to thank the Committee Against Political
Repression for standing up for me and my friends. You can learn about case
at stopFBI.net, and please make a donation there. Or you can make a donation
for our legal expenses: to NLG Foundation, memo line: FBI raids and mail it
to Sarah Smith, 2961 S. Bonaparte, Chicago, IL 60608
Smith’s father, Stan Smith, added “I think Patrick Fitzgerald, the US
District Attorney, Robert Parker of the FBI need to see my daughter and her
friends and apologize to them. And I think President Obama, who was elected
in 2008 because he said he would stop this sort of thing, should make a
point on his next trip to Chicago to personally apologize to my daughter and
her friends for how his government is intimidating them.”
Meanwhile, there are actions across the country to protest this crackdown on
peace activists (sign the
petition<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://www.stopfbi.net/petition.>here).
Firedoglake’s Kevin
Gosztola has this
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://my.firedoglake.com/kgosztola/2010/12/09/fbi-continues-to-target-activists-in-chicago-and-minneapolis/>
report<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://my.firedoglake.com/kgosztola/2010/12/09/fbi-continues-to-target-activists-in-chicago-and-minneapolis/>
:<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/150615/5786813/0/http://my.firedoglake.com/kgosztola/2010/12/09/fbi-continues-to-target-activists-in-chicago-and-minneapolis/>
The hunting down of activists began on September 24th when the FBI raided
homes and offices of activists from Minneapolis and Chicago. Computers,
phones, documents and other personal items were seized and the FBI
officially subpoenaed 14 activists to appear before a Grand Jury. The FBI
began to contact members of the “peace community” and ask them what they
knew about the subpoenaed activists’ “material support for terrorism.”
The attorneys representing the activists have noted “the current definition
of “material support’ can cover just about anything, like providing
humanitarian aid that ends up in the hands of a group tagged as ‘terrorist’
by the US government, or posting a link to an informational website. The
implications of this law, as it is being used, are troubling to anyone who
does community organizing, or anyone who does journalistic reporting or
academic research on wars, conflicts or controversial movements.”
Months later, the activists in Minneapolis and Chicago have not been charged
with a crime, but they continue to face possible jail time if they refuse to
go before a Grand Jury and participate in this “witch hunt.” They have yet
to have their belongings, which were seized by the FBI, returned.
Democracy anyone?
<http://feedblitz.com/r.asp?l=52386045&f=150615&u=5786813&c=0>
December 3, 2010 press conference
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/Muzzlewatch?a=k_SJciabIp4:1SJAUp5-4is:yIl2AUoC8zA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/Muzzlewatch?a=k_SJciabIp4:1SJAUp5-4is:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/Muzzlewatch?a=k_SJciabIp4:1SJAUp5-4is:V_sGLiPBpWU>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/Muzzlewatch?a=k_SJciabIp4:1SJAUp5-4is:qj6IDK7rITs>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/Muzzlewatch?a=k_SJciabIp4:1SJAUp5-4is:l6gmwiTKsz0>
<http://www.feedblitz.com/f?FBLike=http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/k_SJciabIp4/>
• Email to a friend<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Fwd2FriendEdit=150615;4556741;http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/k_SJciabIp4/;Been%20to%20Israel/Palestine%20lately?%20The%20FBI%20may%20come%20knocking%20on%20your%20door.;3937449>•
Article
Search<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Search=150615;4556741;Chicago,Sarah%20Smith,Palestine,FBI;Been%20to%20Israel/Palestine%20lately?%20The%20FBI%20may%20come%20knocking%20on%20your%20door.;3937449>•
View comments<http://www.muzzlewatch.com/2010/12/15/yes-virginia-the-fbi-really-can-subpoena-you-just-for-going-to-palestine/#comments>•
Track comments<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Track=http://www.muzzlewatch.com/2010/12/15/yes-virginia-the-fbi-really-can-subpoena-you-just-for-going-to-palestine/feed/&ref=comment:150615>•
More Recent Articles
- Unprecedented: master’s thesis on Jewish white privilege and Israel
attacked in Canadian
legislature<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/uNrm5zeTz5A/>
- Inconceivable! The US mainstream media on Israel back in
1952.<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/pvEH1lPm-bo/>
- Odious NGO Monitor smears Electronic Intifada, tries to cut
funding<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/nQydV-oNtl4/>
- Watch new doc- Canada-Israel: The other special
relationship<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/CbwrlahmYLI/>
- The Zionist Organization of America’s Effort to Criminalize Campus
Activism through Federal Civil Rights
Legislation<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Muzzlewatch/%7E3/N_IqlhyqyS4/>
Ann Riehle
A. Riehle Original
http://www.ariehleoriginal.com
(708) 534-8661
--- On *Thu, 12/16/10, Just Foreign Policy <naiman at justforeignpolicy.org>*wrote:
From: Just Foreign Policy <naiman at justforeignpolicy.org>
Subject: JFP 12/15: LAT, NYT: Classified Intel Contradicts Rosy Afghan
Review
To: annriehle at sbcglobal.net
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 1:02 AM
*Just Foreign Policy News
December 15, 2010
*
*Just Foreign Policy News on the Web:*
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/785<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=R8dshcvtlNbcHnOVvyfi%2Fi0qapViPTqz>
[To receive just the Summary and a link to the web version, you can use this
webform:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/switchdailynews<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=VSuUrQ17qw1Bx0Prajl7dC0qapViPTqz>
]
*Help Support Our Advocacy for Peace and Diplomacy*
We're in our year-end fundraising drive. Can you help us with a donation of
$15 or $20?
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=7RwJckXzYexiN9M7IQH4aS0qapViPTqz>
*Honor Holbrooke: "Stop This War in Afghanistan"*
To honor Holbrroke's memory, we should obey his last command.
http://www.truth-out.org/honor-holbrooke-stop-this-war-afghanistan65964<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Ig70e6c7uA6bDe9BqU3FFS0qapViPTqz>
*
Rep. McDermott: Could WikiLeaks Have Prevented 9/11?*
"… the information that's coming out is very important. I read an editorial
in the Los Angeles Times, about the fact that had we had WikiLeaks in 2001,
we may well not have had 9/11 occur." McDermott was referring to the op-ed
by former FBI agent Coleen Rowley.
http://www.washingtonstakeout.com/index.php/2010/12/12/rep-mcdermott-could-wikileaks-have-prevented-911/<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=SKY8JuvgqVBOQohLvY3h2nNe7LUtRmeF>
*
CNN: Ex-CIA Ray McGovern Supports Wikileaks' Julian Assange*
"Of course he's a journalist - unlike the 'Fawning Corporate Media.'"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM_IdfPPmEY<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=rn%2BhyRh95%2BmAISz7cEDbsC0qapViPTqz>
*
St. Louis Flash Mob: Boycott Israeli Apartheid*
"Hang up on Motorola."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGAdfvGQ-xg<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=dxLxqJqgBKKcNFFICh8S2S0qapViPTqz>
*
Afghanistan experts call for peace deal and exit strategy*
Afghanistan experts with decades of experience in the country call on
President Obama to change course and push for a peace settlement and exit
strategy. Signers include: Scott Atran, Michael Cohen, Gilles Dorronsoro,
Bernard Finel, Joshua Foust, Anatol Lieven, Ahmed Rashid, and Alex Strick
van Linschoten.
http://www.afghanistancalltoreason.com/<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=bInNzJKRwiRCvW6b0QCYOS0qapViPTqz>
*Rap News 5: Wikileaks & the war on journalism*
A "special report with Robert Foster" recounts the story of WikiLeaks vs.
the Empire. Sam Husseini calls this "the best video of the year."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXbCwq4ewBU<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=7gapghJBd%2BQxN96pTaRrDS0qapViPTqz>
*Summary:*
*U.S./Top News <#12cef2b862944762_December1510w1>*
1) Two new assessments by the U.S. intelligence community present a gloomy
picture of the Afghanistan war, contradicting a more upbeat view expressed
by military officials, the Los Angeles Times reports. The classified
intelligence reports contend that large swaths of Afghanistan are still at
risk of falling to the Taliban. The reports also say Pakistan's government
remains unwilling to stop its covert support for members of the Afghan
Taliban. Key members of Congress are watching the Obama strategy warily, the
NYT says. "Our political and diplomatic efforts are not in line with our
military efforts," said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), who is under
consideration as the next chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. "It
may be time to consider a smaller troop footprint."
2) Both Republican and Democratic administrations have refused to make a
decisive choice between making war with Iran or talking peace, write Daniel
Brumberg and Barry Blechman for Foreign Policy. Sustained U.S.-Iranian
engagement would undercut the "threat" that hardliners invoke to legitimate
their efforts to pummel or isolate their critics. An escalation of
U.S.-Iranian tensions will only harm the efforts of those Iranian leaders
who favor internal dialogue to make their voices heard. Secretary of State
Clinton's recent BBC interview, in which she stated U.S. conditional
acceptance of Iran's enrichment rights, provides one step in the right
direction.
3) Bradley Manning has never been convicted of any crime, writes Glenn
Greenwald for Salon. Despite that, he has been detained at the U.S. Marine
brig in Quantico, Virginia for five months - and for two months before that
in a military jail in Kuwait - under conditions that constitute cruel and
inhumane treatment and, by the standards of many nations, even torture.
4) The US military has dramatically stepped up air strikes and manhunts in
Afghanistan in a bid to weaken the Taliban, reflecting a return to
"counter-terrorism" tactics, AFP reports. The previous commander in
Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, scaled back air strikes and
artillery to try to reduce civilian casualties, but his successor, General
David Petraeus, has taken a more aggressive approach. US aircraft flew 850
combat sorties in November, three times the number for the same month last
year, according to the US Air Force. More firepower will be on display soon
in southern Afghanistan, where Marines will have M1A1 tanks in their arsenal
- the first use of US tanks in the war.
5) Israel's ambassador to the U.S. said Israel is still seeking 20
additional F- 35 fighter jets even after the failure of a U.S. offer to
provide the planes in exchange for a freeze on Israeli settlement
construction, Bloomberg reports. Defense officials from both countries are
discussing ways to pay for the "expensive" jets because Israel lacks the
funds, Michael Oren said.
6) Leading Australian journalists have stepped up to defend WikiLeaks,
reports John Nichols in The Nation. Dozens of major newspaper editors,
broadcasters and leading journalists have signed a letter defending
Wikileaks. In the US, FAIR is circulating a statement of support. [Nichols
reproduces the FAIR letter, which JFP signed; you can sign here:
http://bit.ly/hIhPMS<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2FKzLbeAmj8kBnb%2BL0v%2BSVi0qapViPTqz>-
JFP.]
7) Two new classified intelligence reports offer a more negative assessment
than the White House review and say there is a limited chance of success
unless Pakistan hunts down insurgents operating from havens on its Afghan
border, the New York Times reports. Some Democrats are losing patience with
the war, the NYT says. "You're not going to get to the point where the
Taliban are gone and the border is perfectly controlled," said
Representative Adam Smith, who serves Armed Services Committee and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Smith said there would be
increasing pressure from the political left on Obama to end the war, and
predicted Democrats in Congress would resist continuing to spend $100
billion annually on Afghanistan.
*Afghanistan <#12cef2b862944762_December1510w2>*
8) The Red Cross says Afghanistan security has deteriorated to its worst
point since the overthrow of the Taliban nine years ago and is preventing
aid groups from reaching victims of conflict, the New York Times reports. By
every measure that the Red Cross tracks, the situation has worsened
throughout the country for civilian casualties, internal displacement and
health care access and all of it is "against the background of a
proliferation of armed actors," the head of the Afghanistan office said.
Access, he said, "in 30 years has never been as poor and as difficult as it
is today."
*
Iran <#12cef2b862944762_December1510w3>*
9) A Shiite religious ceremony in Iran was shattered by a double suicide
bombing on Wednesday, leaving at least 39 people dead, the New York Times
reports. Jundollah claimed responsibility. Iranian officials blamed the US,
which the US denied. The Obama administration recently added Jundollah to a
list of foreign terrorist organizations. Jundollah's leaders have "confirmed
its commitment to continue its terrorist activities," the State Department
said.
*Israel/Palestine <#12cef2b862944762_December1510w4>*
10) Israel barred a group of Palestinian firefighters on security grounds
from attending a ceremony where they were to be honored for their help in
battling a deadly forest fire, Al Jazeera reports. The Israeli military said
the denial was a mistake and issued a statement of regret. But the
Palestinian fire chief whose permit arrived too late for him to attend said
entry refusals for no apparent reason were routine for many Palestinians.
*Colombia/Venezuela <#12cef2b862944762_December1510w5>*
11) Former Colombian president Uribe confirmed the contents of a State
Department cable exposed by Wikileaks, according to which he contemplated
sending troops across into Venezuelan territory to capture and arrest FARC
guerrilla leaders, Mercopress reports.
*
Contents:*
*U.S./Top News*
1) U.S. intelligence reports cast doubt on war progress in Afghanistan
The assessments contradict defense officials' optimistic outlook. They
contend that large swaths of the country remain at risk of falling to the
Taliban and that Pakistan is still supporting militants, officials say.
Ken Dilanian and David S. Cloud, Los Angeles Times, December 15, 2010
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-afghan-review-20101215,0,1794946,full.story<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=nPh0aU0rTl%2B3PhIdltkDRC0qapViPTqz>
Washington - Two new assessments by the U.S. intelligence community present
a gloomy picture of the Afghanistan war, contradicting a more upbeat view
expressed by military officials as the White House prepares to release a
progress report on the 9-year-old conflict.
The classified intelligence reports contend that large swaths of Afghanistan
are still at risk of falling to the Taliban, according to officials who were
briefed on the National Intelligence Estimates on Afghanistan and Pakistan,
which represent the collective view of more than a dozen intelligence
agencies.
The reports, the subject of a recent closed hearing by the Senate
Intelligence Committee, also say Pakistan's government remains unwilling to
stop its covert support for members of the Afghan Taliban who mount attacks
against U.S. troops from the tribal areas of the neighboring nation. The
officials declined to be named because they were discussing classified data.
The intelligence community's analysis contrasts sharply with remarks last
week by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who said after visiting the
region that he is convinced the administration's strategy is turning around
the Afghanistan war.
On Tuesday, military officers hotly contested the intelligence estimates,
saying they are "dated" because the review period ended in September, as the
last of additional American forces were arriving in Afghanistan. The defense
officials said the assessments did not reflect recent gains.
[...]
A senior intelligence official countered that claim, saying, "The notion
that intelligence officers aren't on the ground in Afghanistan and on the
front lines in the fight against terrorism is preposterous. Our people are
working side by side with the United States military and our foreign
partners to thwart our common enemies."
National Intelligence Estimates make use of analysis and information from
all the intelligence agencies, including those that are part of the
Pentagon.
[...]
Obama, who sent 30,000 additional troops to support his counterinsurgency
strategy in Afghanistan, has pledged that military withdrawals would start
in July 2011, contingent on conditions there. But Obama told members of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization last month that 2014 is the date by which
the U.S. hopes to cede full control to Afghan forces, an indication that any
2011 drawdown is likely to be small.
The latter announcement was meant in part to emphasize to Pakistan that the
U.S. intended to remain heavily engaged in the region, increasing pressure
on the South Asian nation to cut its ties to Afghan Islamist insurgents, one
U.S. official said.
[...]
Military commanders acknowledge that a failure to destroy the Taliban's
sanctuary in Pakistan could further delay the success of the Obama strategy.
The intelligence estimates conclude that Pakistan is unwilling and unable to
stop harboring and supporting the Taliban, one U.S. official said.
Pakistan, which is due to receive $7.5 billion in U.S. civilian aid over
three years, denies secretly backing the Taliban. However, intelligence
gathered by the U.S. continues to suggest that elements of Pakistan's
security services arm, train and fund extremist militants, according to
military and State Department documents disclosed this year by WikiLeaks.
Unless the Taliban sanctuaries in Pakistan are closed, "it's going to take a
lot longer" to achieve stability and hand over security responsibilities to
Afghan troops, Army Maj. Gen. John C. Campbell, the senior commander in
eastern Afghanistan, told reporters last week.
[...]
Privately, a senior military official acknowledged that "there are no
guarantees as to how Pakistan will ultimately address the sanctuary
problem."
Key members of Congress are watching the Obama strategy warily. "Our
political and diplomatic efforts are not in line with our military efforts,"
said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), who is under consideration as the next
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. "It may be time to consider a
smaller troop footprint."
[...]
2) Strategic engagement with Iran
Daniel Brumberg and Barry Blechman, Foreign Policy, December 14, 2010
http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/12/14/strategic_engagement_with_iran<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=TtscaiXCVstF%2B%2Fl%2Fb6BDAy0qapViPTqz>
[Brumberg is a special advisor to the U.S. Institute of Peace. Blechman is
Vice President of the Stimson Center.]
Frustrated by the absence of substantive progress during the latest round of
P5+1 talks in Geneva, some Iran analysts would have U.S. policy plunge once
again into the murky territory of regime change. Some hope that a military
attack might bring about this goal. Others, taking what seems to be the high
road, argue that the U.S. should back a people's democratic revolution. This
second idea is deeply alluring. After all, it accords with our most
cherished ideas while also offering a solution that serves U.S. national
interests. What advocate of democracy would not want Iran's Green Movement
to prevail? In one fell swoop, its victory would bring to the table
legitimate Iranian leaders who keenly defend Iran's right to peaceful
nuclear power, but who would also provide a far more constructive
negotiating partner for the U.S. and its allies.
The problem, however, is that democratic reform in Iran is a long-term
proposition. As a result, it cannot serve as the basis for an effective
U.S.-Iran policy. If the Obama White House were to rest its efforts to
dissuade Iran from pursuing nuclear weapons on regime change, it would end
up with an Iran policy as incoherent as those of the administrations that
preceded it.
That incoherence is rooted in the reluctance of both Republican and
Democratic administrations to make a decisive choice between making war or
talking peace. Given the costs of both it is hardly surprising that our
leaders have been unwilling or unable to mobilize political and bureaucratic
support for either option. Instead, they have split the difference by using
a mix of punitive measures and tepid incentives to in one way or another
"contain" Iran - thus avoiding the domestic discomfort that would inevitably
accompany a more strategically cogent policy.
[...]
If, as administration officials insist, sanctions are a "means rather than
an end," we need to define that end far more clearly. If it is stopping
Iran's nuclear program, then let's be clear: sanctions may be slowing that
program down, but by themselves they will not compel Iran's leaders to
comply with the International Atomic Energy Commission or the UN Security
Council. To get the attention of Iran's current leaders, we must decide
whether the goal of sanctions (or for that matter, engagement) is to set the
stage for war or for sustained peace negotiations.
[...]
There is one thing, however, that the U.S. can do promote political
decompression in Iran, and that is to make détente with the Islamic Republic
a top priority. Sustained U.S.-Iranian engagement would undercut the
"threat" that ultra hardliners regularly invoke to legitimate their efforts
to pummel or isolate their critics. The latter include prominent
conservatives, many of whom are eager to deflect the efforts of
Revolutionary Guard to undermine the autonomy of clerical institutions,
private sector businesses, and the parliament. Fighting for their very
political and economic survival, these conservative leaders are likely to
push for a process of internal political accommodation that could open up
some doors for reformists. While they face many hurdles, one thing is sure:
an escalation of U.S.-Iranian tensions (much less a war!) will only harm the
efforts of those Iranian leaders who favor internal dialogue to make their
voices heard.
In the coming decade, Iran's politics will be defined by a slow, agonizing
struggle waged through rather than against the institutions of the Islamic
Republic. If we indulge in the seductive dream of a sudden democratic
revolution - whether delivered by bombs from above or by popular resistance
from below - we will destroy the seeds of a political change in Iran. But we
if we push for a process of engagement that moves Iran and the U.S. from
conflict to diplomatic coexistence, we can help nurture Iran's own capacity
to change and transform from within.
Let us hope that 2011 will be the year, not for war, but for a revitalized
diplomatic initiative to resolve the crisis over Iran's nuclear program. If
we do not pursue a bolder engagement strategy, the U.S. and its allies will
ultimately have no choice but to contain a nuclear Iran. Secretary of State
Clinton's recent BBC interview, in which she stated U.S. conditional
acceptance of Iran's enrichment rights, provides one step in the right
direction. The Obama administration must move forward, despite the obstacles
at home and abroad.
3) The inhumane conditions of Bradley Manning's detention
Glenn Greenwald, Salon, Wednesday, Dec 15, 2010
http://www.salon.com/news/wikileaks/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2010/12/14/manning<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BDOesMS%2BfL0ag32Kcbn2ry0qapViPTqz>
Bradley Manning, the 22-year-old U.S. Army Private accused of leaking
classified documents to WikiLeaks, has never been convicted of that crime,
nor of any other crime. Despite that, he has been detained at the U.S.
Marine brig in Quantico, Virginia for five months - and for two months
before that in a military jail in Kuwait - under conditions that constitute
cruel and inhumane treatment and, by the standards of many nations, even
torture. Interviews with several people directly familiar with the
conditions of Manning's detention, ultimately including a Quantico brig
official (Lt. Brian Villiard) who confirmed much of what they conveyed,
establishes that the accused leaker is subjected to detention conditions
likely to create long-term psychological injuries.
Since his arrest in May, Manning has been a model detainee, without any
episodes of violence or disciplinary problems. He nonetheless was declared
from the start to be a "Maximum Custody Detainee," the highest and most
repressive level of military detention, which then became the basis for the
series of inhumane measures imposed on him.
>From the beginning of his detention, Manning has been held in intensive
solitary confinement. For 23 out of 24 hours every day - for seven straight
months and counting - he sits completely alone in his cell. Even inside his
cell, his activities are heavily restricted; he's barred even from
exercising and is under constant surveillance to enforce those restrictions.
For reasons that appear completely punitive, he's being denied many of the
most basic attributes of civilized imprisonment, including even a pillow or
sheets for his bed (he is not and never has been on suicide watch). For the
one hour per day when he is freed from this isolation, he is barred from
accessing any news or current events programs. Lt. Villiard protested that
the conditions are not "like jail movies where someone gets thrown into the
hole," but confirmed that he is in solitary confinement, entirely alone in
his cell except for the one hour per day he is taken out.
In sum, Manning has been subjected for many months without pause to
inhumane, personality-erasing, soul-destroying, insanity-inducing conditions
of isolation similar to those perfected at America's Supermax prison in
Florence, Colorado: all without so much as having been convicted of
anything. And as is true of many prisoners subjected to warped treatment of
this sort, the brig's medical personnel now administer regular doses of
anti-depressants to Manning to prevent his brain from snapping from the
effects of this isolation.
Just by itself, the type of prolonged solitary confinement to which Manning
has been subjected for many months is widely viewed around the world as
highly injurious, inhumane, punitive, and arguably even a form of torture.
In his widely praised March, 2009 New Yorker article - entitled "Is
Long-Term Solitary Confinement Torture?" - the surgeon and journalist Atul
Gawande assembled expert opinion and personal anecdotes to demonstrate that,
as he put it, "all human beings experience isolation as torture." By itself,
prolonged solitary confinement routinely destroys a person's mind and drives
them into insanity. A March, 2010 article in The Journal of the American
Academy of Psychiatry and the Law explains that "solitary confinement is
recognized as difficult to withstand; indeed, psychological stressors such
as isolation can be as clinically distressing as physical torture."
For that reason, many Western nations - and even some non-Western nations
notorious for human rights abuses - refuse to employ prolonged solitary
confinement except in the most extreme cases of prisoner violence. "It's an
awful thing, solitary," John McCain wrote of his experience in isolated
confinement in Vietnam. "It crushes your spirit."
[...]
4) In bid to break Taliban, US embraces more firepower
AFP, December 15, 2010, 8:01 pm
http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/8518170/in-bid-to-break-taliban-us-embraces-more-firepower/<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=MszznDsnlDMDKO03U4s5qC0qapViPTqz>
Washington - The US military has dramatically stepped up air strikes and
manhunts in Afghanistan in a bid to weaken the Taliban, reflecting a return
to "counter-terrorism" tactics.
Dropping more bombs and carrying out more raids by special operations forces
underscores a sense of urgency in the war effort, as the White House
prepares to release a strategy review and commanders try to change the
dynamic of a conflict mired in stalemate.
In announcing a surge of 30,000 troops a year ago, President Barack Obama
embraced the idea of a "counter-insurgency" strategy that focused less on
firefights with the Taliban and more on securing key towns, training Afghan
forces and bolstering local government.
But the need to cut off the insurgency's supply routes to sanctuaries in
neighboring Pakistan has led to a renewed emphasis on more conventional
"targeting" operations, said General James Cartwright, vice chair of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[...]
The previous commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, scaled
back air strikes and artillery to try to reduce civilian casualties, but his
successor, General David Petraeus, has taken a more aggressive approach.
US aircraft flew 850 combat sorties in November, three times the number for
the same month last year, according to the US Air Force.
>From January to the end of November, warplanes carried out 30,000 close air
support missions for troops on the ground, a 13 percent increase compared
with the whole of 2009, it said.
In the past six months, coalition forces have carried out more than 7,000
special operations missions, killing or capturing more than 600 militant
leaders and inflicting heavy losses on insurgent fighters, with 2,000 rank
and file soldiers killed, the NATO-led force told The Long War Journal.
More firepower will be on display soon in southern Afghanistan, where
Marines will have M1A1 tanks in their arsenal - the first use of American
tanks in the war.
The intensifying pace of lethal operations has been accompanied by record
casualties among US and NATO-led forces, in the most deadly year yet in the
nine-year-old war with 693 soldiers killed, according to the independent
website icasualties.org.
[...]
5) Israel Pursues 20 Added F-35 Jets Offered in U.S. Peace Swap
Gopal Ratnam and Viola Gienger, Bloomberg, December 14, 2010, 8:08 PM EST
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-12-14/israel-pursues-20-added-f-35-jets-offered-in-u-s-peace-swap.html<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=wR9LBc6tTKjygFKdMKhajy0qapViPTqz>
Dec. 15 - Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, said his country is
still seeking 20 additional F- 35 fighter jets even after the failure of a
U.S. offer to provide the planes in exchange for a freeze on Israeli
settlement construction.
The 20 jets would be in addition to the 20 Lockheed Martin Corp.-built F-35
Joint Strike Fighters, valued at about $2.8 billion, that Israel ordered in
October, Oren told Bloomberg News reporters and editors in Washington
yesterday. "It was clear from the beginning that the 20 we were purchasing
would not be enough and we'd require more," Oren said. The F-35 planes are
the "ballast in helping Israel maintain its qualitative military edge" over
potential foes in the region, he said.
Defense officials from both countries are discussing ways to pay for the
"expensive" jets because Israel lacks the funds, Oren said.
The U.S. had offered the 20 additional F-35 jets as part of an effort to
revive direct Middle East peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority, which stalled after an earlier freeze on West Bank settlement
construction ended in September. Israel's Lieutenant General Gabi Ashkenazi
confirmed the offer at a Nov. 17 news conference at the Pentagon.
The Obama administration said last week that it would stop pushing Israel
for a renewed 90-day construction moratorium. "The 90-day extension
discussion is off the table but the 20 extra jets are very much on the
table," Oren said. "It's not attached to the 90-day freeze."
[...]
6) Journalists Begin, Finally, to Stand Up in Defense of WikiLeaks and
Freedom of Information
John Nichols, The Nation, December 14, 2010
http://www.thenation.com/blog/157106/journalists-begin-finally-stand-defense-wikileaks-and-freedom-information<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=xpaeLeYKgD9wW6cSr%2F3953Ne7LUtRmeF>
Leading Australian journalists have stepped up in a big way to defend
WikiLeaks, with the head of the nation's major media union arguing that
"attacks on WikiLeaks can also be seen as attacks on the Australian media
outlets which have worked with the organisation to publish leaked material."
In response to calls for the prosecution of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
(an Australian) and attempts to block the distribution of leaked US
diplomatic cables, Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance federal secretary
Christopher Warren says: "Allegations that the work of WikiLeaks is somehow
illegal are yet to be proven in Australia, or in any other country. The
Alliance and (the International Federation of Journalists Asia-Pacific
section) calls on governments to refrain from prejudicial speculation that
risks harming our democratic system."
While most US journalists have been slow to defend WikiLeaks - and some have
been openly critical of the website's distribution of leaked US diplomatic
cables - their Australian peers are pushing back against attempts to
constrain freedom of information and the press.
Dozens of major newspaper editors, broadcasters and leading journalists have
signed a letter defending Wikileaks, and the nation's most respected senior
journalists are condemning Australian officials - including Prime Minister
Julia Gillard and federal Attorney General Robert McClelland - for
suggesting that Assange broke the law by publishing the diplomatic cables.
"What they said was ridiculous," declared Laurie Oakes, a veteran newspaper
and broadcast journalist who for years has been one of the nation's
highest-profile political commentators. "To brand what the WikiLeaks site
has done as illegal when there is no evidence at all of any breach of the
law, was I think, demeaning. I think as journalists we should make it clear
that that is our view. Whether it's a letterbox full of classified cables,
or a quarter of a million documents in digital form, the principle is the
same, and we should fight for the right to publish."
[...]
American journalists have been slower to step up. And some have even joined
Sarah Palin and others in attacking WikiLeaks at a time when key players in
Congress are proposing official assaults on the website and those associated
with it.
But the media watchdog group Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting [3] has
stepped up with a strong letter signed by author Barbara Ehrenreich,
academic Noam Chomsky, Pentagon papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and a
number of journalists associated with The Nation, Salon, In These Times,
Free Speech TV and other outlets.
[Nichols reproduces the FAIR letter, which JFP signed; you can sign it here:
http://bit.ly/hIhPMS<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=XKUw6iGoxt8vrBNMLXlpMC0qapViPTqz>-
JFP]
[...]
7) Intelligence Reports Offer Dim View of Afghan War
Elisabeth Bumiller, New York Times, December 14, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/15/world/asia/15policy.html<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2Bu4NmYE44UWRF5kB8hawky0qapViPTqz>
Washington - As President Obama prepares to release a review of American
strategy in Afghanistan that will claim progress in the nine-year-old war
there, two new classified intelligence reports offer a more negative
assessment and say there is a limited chance of success unless Pakistan
hunts down insurgents operating from havens on its Afghan border.
The reports, one on Afghanistan and one on Pakistan, say that although there
have been gains for the United States and NATO in the war, the unwillingness
of Pakistan to shut down militant sanctuaries in its lawless tribal region
remains a serious obstacle. American military commanders say insurgents
freely cross from Pakistan into Afghanistan to plant bombs and fight
American troops and then return to Pakistan for rest and resupply.
The findings in the reports, called National Intelligence Estimates,
represent the consensus view of the United States' 16 intelligence agencies,
as opposed to the military, and were provided last week to some members of
the Senate and House Intelligence Committees. The findings were described by
a number of American officials who read the reports' executive summaries.
[...]
The White House review comes as some members of Mr. Obama's party are losing
patience with the war. "You're not going to get to the point where the
Taliban are gone and the border is perfectly controlled," said
Representative Adam Smith, a Washington Democrat who serves on the Armed
Services Committee and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, in an
interview on Tuesday.
Mr. Smith said there would be increasing pressure from the political left on
Mr. Obama to end the war, and he predicted that Democrats in Congress would
resist continuing to spend $100 billion annually on Afghanistan. "We're not
going to be hanging out over there fighting these guys like we're fighting
them now for 20 years," Mr. Smith said.
*
Afghanistan*
8) For Red Cross, Afghanistan Situation Now at its Worst
Alissa J. Rubin, New York Times, December 15, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/world/asia/16redcross.html<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=jWQ2VX%2Flp4DfpXDo6WWD1i0qapViPTqz>
Kabul, Afghanistan - The International Committee of the Red Cross, which
usually seeks to avoid the public eye, held a rare news conference here
Wednesday to express deep concern that Afghanistan security has deteriorated
to its worst point since the overthrow of the Taliban nine years ago and is
preventing aid groups from reaching victims of conflict.
"The sheer fact the I.C.R.C. has organized a press conference is an
expression of us being extremely concerned of yet another year of fighting
with dramatic consequences for an ever-growing number of people in by now
almost the entire country," said Reto Stocker, the head of the Afghanistan
office.
By every measure that the Red Cross tracks, the situation has worsened
throughout the country for civilian casualties, internal displacement and
health care access and all of it is "against the background of a
proliferation of armed actors," Mr. Stocker said.
The Red Cross, one of the oldest relief organizations in the world, began
working 30 years ago in Afghanistan when Afghans started to fight the Soviet
occupation. Unlike many other groups, it maintains dialogue with all sides
in conflicts so that it can reach and treat victims of violence regardless
of their allegiances. The Red Cross admission that it is unable to reach
people it has a mandate to help is a measure of the gravity of the situation
here.
Throughout the country civilian casualties have risen steadily , said Mr.
Stocker, pointing to the growing numbers of wounded taken to Mirwais
Hospital in Kandahar, which the Red Cross supports. Compared with the 2009,
admissions so far this have increased by 25 percent to 2,650, and an
increasing proportion of wounds are from roadside bombs, he said. "This is a
big, big problem," he said.
The number of internally displaced people - those who have fled conflict or
natural disaster - has also risen 25 percent compared with last year, said
Mr. Stocker.
He noted that the Red Cross may be undercounting because it can no longer
travel many parts of the country. Access, he said, "in 30 years has never
been as poor and as difficult as it is today."
*Iran*
9) Dozens Die in Suicide Bombing in Iran
William Yong, New York Times, December 15, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/world/middleeast/16iran.html<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=jIC2MvC9tWYpVHdEf72cCojikuVATfGH>
Tehran - A solemn Shiite religious mourning ceremony near a mosque in
southeastern Iran was shattered by a double suicide bombing on Wednesday,
leaving at least 39 people dead and many more wounded.
Jundollah, an outlawed insurgent group that has carried out other attacks in
the region near the Pakistan border, claimed responsibility. Iranian
officials said they had evidence that American agents were responsible,
which the United States denied.
"The advanced equipment and facilities of the perpetrators show that this
attack was supported by the regional intelligence services of the United
States," said Ali Abdolahi, deputy for security at the Interior Ministry, in
comments published on the official IRNA news agency Web site.
Mr. Abdolahi confirmed that two bombers detonated explosive-packed belts on
Wednesday morning among crowds gathered outside the Imam Hussein Mosque in
the city of Chabahar, near the border with Pakistan. One attacker was said
to have been identified by the police and shot before setting off his
explosives to little effect. The police arrested a third attacker, according
to reports by semiofficial news agencies.
[...]
Jundollah's claim of responsibility was first reported by Al-Arabiya, a Web
site based in Dubai. Members of Jundollah,, whose stated aim is to fight
alleged discrimination against Sunnis of the Baluch ethnic group, have vexed
Iran's security services for years. Iran has long accused the United States
of backing the group, although the Obama administration recently added
Jundollah to a list of foreign terrorist organizations.
"Jundollah uses a variety of terrorist tactics, including suicide bombings,
ambushes, kidnappings and targeted assassinations," the State Department
said in a statement, adding that the movement's leaders have "confirmed its
commitment to continue its terrorist activities."
[...]
*Israel/Palestine*
10) Israel bars entry to W Bank firemen
Ceremony to honour firefighters cancelled after Israel denies entry permits
to Palestinians who helped battle blaze.
Al Jazeera, 14 Dec 2010 20:31 GMT
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/12/20101214151434351650.html<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=aWLXIMIoRRvYgW5j2E1XRi0qapViPTqz>
Israel has barred a group of Palestinian firefighters from attending a
ceremony where they were to be honoured for their help in battling a deadly
forest fire last week.
At least 10 Palestinians were invited to attend the event in northern
Israel, where the four-day fire left 41 people dead and ravaged large swaths
of forest. But Ahmad Tibi, an Arab member of the Israeli parliament and one
of the organisers of the ceremony, said the event was cancelled when three
of the Palestinians were refused entry permits to Israel on Tuesday.
He said the military had turned the firefighters away on security grounds.
"It's a theatre of the absurd," he told The Associated Press news agency.
"This is a regular day-to-day practice of the occupation, and it exposes its
ugly face."
The Israeli military said the Palestinians were denied entry due to a
"technical mistake". It said permits have now been issued, and it later
issued a statement expressing "regret" for the incident.
But Ahmed Rizek, the Palestinian fire chief whose permit arrived too late
for him to attend, said entry refusals for no apparent reason were routine
for many Palestinians.
He said he and his staff were surprised to learn when they arrived at the
checkpoint that not all of the men would be granted entry into Israel.
Palestinians are required to have permits to enter Israel from the West
Bank, and many complain that Israeli approval or rejection can be arbitrary.
About 20 Palestinian firefighters joined the international effort to battle
the fire that swept through the Carmel forest in northern Israel.
[...]
*Colombia/Venezuela*
11) Uribe confirms Wikileaks: he was prepared to cross into Venezuela
territory
Mercopress, Tuesday, December 14th 2010
http://en.mercopress.com/2010/12/14/uribe-confirms-wikileaks-he-was-prepared-to-cross-into-venezuela-territory<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=r431Qe5paZlYSrxOw4IQUS0qapViPTqz>
Former Colombian president Alvaro Uribe (2002-2010) confirmed the contents
of a confidential US State Department confidential cable exposed by
Wikileaks, according to which he contemplated sending troops across into
Venezuelan territory to capture and arrest FARC guerrilla leaders.
In his Twitter Uribe wrote: "Reply to Wikileaks: I proposed it and I did it:
to protect Colombians you must capture the terrorists where ever they are",
although he did not give details of any such actions.
According to the cable Uribe in early 2008 spoke of sending troops into
neighboring Venezuela to capture Colombian FARC leaders he suspected were
hiding there, the U.S. envoy in Bogota said in one of the cables.
[...]
-
Just Foreign Policy<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=lXmQXwCY0WIY3SAmRt9seC0qapViPTqz>is
a membership organization devoted to reforming US foreign policy so it
reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans. The archive
of the Just Foreign Policy News is
here<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=AxVXePnu0%2FqFRn5aH0sE1i0qapViPTqz>
.
------------
Click here to unsubscribe<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Dtcy0ThN%2B3AXpMf3KTXMZS0qapViPTqz>
[image: empowered by Salsa] <http://www.salsalabs.com/?email>
--
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
naiman at justforeignpolicy.org
Urge Congress to Support a Timetable for Military Withdrawal from
Afghanistan
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/feingold-mcgovern
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20101216/10c04342/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list