[Peace-discuss] Tim on war funding
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Sat Jul 3 02:59:21 CDT 2010
Afghanistan War: Why Are We Doing It?
by Rep. Tim Johnson, July 03, 2010
Statement in the House by Rep. Tim Johnson of Illinois on funding the war in
Afghanistan.
I stand in opposition to this rule and in sincere but deep opposition to this
$63 billion massive spending bill, and particularly the war spending component
of the bill.
I speak, I believe, on the behalf of the hundreds of thousands of brave men and
women who serve America in the Middle East with neither a defined objective nor
the ability to assess victory or defeat; and on behalf of families of our
military personnel around the world who have lost their fathers or their mothers
or their sons or their daughters in a valiant but shortsighted effort and battle
that can never be won; and on behalf of the American taxpayers who have seen
more than $1 trillion poured into an attempt to fight terror, where there is not
even a remote relationship to the welfare of the American people; and really,
also, on behalf of the innocent children who have had the misfortune to simply
be in the ever-changing line of fire and the vicinity of terrorists who move
effortlessly from Iraq to Somalia to Yemen to Paraguay to Afghanistan like the
Whack-a-Mole at the county fair in the form of unconventional and ill-defined
tribal warfare that 2,000 years have taught us we simply cannot fight.
I think it was November of 1952, when I was about 6 years old, that Charles
Schultz and his Peanuts comic strip came out with the annual saga where, every
year, Charlie Brown comes up to the football, and Lucy tells Charlie Brown year
after year, "Just one more time, we’ll let you kick ball." And each year, she
pulled the football out, only to find Charlie Brown on his rear end.
I would suggest to you, Mr. Speaker and Members of the House, in this somewhat
stretched analogy, that a series of Commanders-in-Chief are Lucy, and we’re
Charlie Brown, and the football is the illusive promise of a goal that we simply
cannot reach. We cannot force a culture to accept our values, and we cannot
impose Western democracy on a people who don’t understand or accept it and whose
leadership is corrupt and antidemocratic beyond repair. And we cannot continue
to spend the billions and, arguably, trillions of dollars of the hardworking men
and women in this country in a venture that has no objective, no end game, and
no proximate connection to the well-being of our Nation.
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker and Members of the House, we cannot afford
economically, we cannot afford militarily, and we cannot afford as a people to
pass this bill. This President who, frankly, won an election based on his strong
antiwar message, like many of his predecessors, asked us one more time to spend
a few more billion dollars — in this case $38 billion — and a few thousand more
men and women in an effort to kick the football just one more time. It simply
isn’t doable.
I suggest to you, Mr. Speaker and Members of the House, that this rule underlies
a bill that the vast majority, I believe, of the American people don’t want. I
represent a district in central Illinois, and I think I speak in many ways for
middle America. I voted for the authorization of force in Iraq and, frankly,
Afghanistan; and I believe, like many of us, I may have questioned my vote. But
I believe that we’re the greatest nation on Earth, thanks in large part to the
generations of fighting men and women who have given their lives to this great
cause and democracy and this great Nation of ours.
As we prepare to celebrate our independence in a few days, I think I speak on
behalf of the average American citizen who says, For what? What is this money
being expended for? Why are we doing it? And what’s the end game? And I would
suggest to you, Mr. Speaker and Members of the House, that there is no end game,
and I would respectfully ask that this rule and the underlying bill be defeated.
http://original.antiwar.com/tim-johnson/2010/07/02/afghanistan-war-why-are-we-doing-it/
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list