[Peace-discuss] Communist threat
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Fri Jul 9 11:33:16 CDT 2010
SPIEGEL ONLINE
07/08/2010 06:06 PM
"'The Most Dangerous Philosopher in the West'
Welcome to the Slavoj Zizek Show"
By Philipp Oehmke
In the midst of a crisis of capitalism, the Western underground is rediscovering
communism. Its star is the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek, who mixes Marxism
with pop culture and psychoanalysis. His appearances offer stand-up comedy for a
radical leftist avant-garde.
It is five a.m. on a Friday morning, and Slavoj Zizek is on his way to the Idea
of Communism Conference, traveling from Ljubljana to Berlin via Zurich. He finds
it irritating that Alain Badiou, the French Maoist, will be making the
introductory remarks.
And is it true, he wonders, that Toni -- Antonio Negri, a former sympathizer
with the Red Brigades terrorist group -- is also coming, even though he is
always at odds with Alain? When would Negri speak, what might he talk about and
-- above all -- why has he, Slavoj Zizek, not been kept in the loop?
But Zizek doesn't have time to waste pondering these minor irritations. He's
brought a few stacks of notes, which he must now use to write a one-and-a-half
hour presentation during his two short flights. A bit about Marx, a lot about
Hegel, something about Badiou's "communist hypothesis" (which, he reasons, he
could criticize a little) and something about Negri's concept of the "multitude"
(which he could even criticize sharply).
He can't find his notes. But it doesn't matter, because he is so full of
thoughts that are just waiting to bubble out of him. He's packed an extra
T-shirt for tomorrow or the next day. It's hot in Ljubljana, even at this early
hour. Zizek is already sweating. The conference on communism begins in a few hours.
The Big Three
The Big Three, the great thinkers of the new left, will be speaking at the
event, held at Berlin's Volksbühne Theater on a weekend in late June: Antonio
Negri, an Italian in his late 70s, is a former political prisoner and the author
of "Empire," the best known neo-Marxist bestseller of the last 10 years; Alain
Badiou, a philosophy professor in Paris, is in his early 70s, very abstract, a
Maoist and a universalist, and is searching for a new "communist hypothesis";
and Zizek, a Slovenian psychoanalyst in his early 60s who teaches philosophy in
Ljubljana and is a visiting professor in London and Saas Fe, Switzerland, the
"Elvis of Cultural Theory" (as he is referred to in a film). One of his
bitterest opponents once called Zizek "the most dangerous philosopher in the
West." It wasn't meant as a compliment, which is precisely why Zizek likes the
nickname so much.
The three men are intellectuals, but they are also stars, like the
existentialists Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus and, more recently, the
post-structuralists Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida. But
ever since the height of the post-structuralists' popularity, almost 20 years
ago now, this position has remained unoccupied, with the possible exception of
Bernard Henri-Levy, whom Zizek despises mainly because of his tendency to show
too much chest hair.
It was Negri who revived radical leftist theory 10 years ago. The socialism of
the Eastern Bloc had failed, and American political scientist Francis Fukuyama
had proclaimed the eternal victory of capitalism and, with it, "the end of
history." Then came Negri. He was steeped in theory, but he was also a credible
class warrior. He'd been in prison because the authorities believed he was the
brain behind the Red Brigades. Michael Hardt, an American literature professor,
helped him summarize his thoughts in three books. They became global
bestsellers, the most successful of which was the first one, "Empire," a sort of
new Mao bible for a young, hip, anti-G8 left.
Zizek, Badiou and Negri have known each other for years. Sometimes they work
together, but each of them is more apt to take note of what the others are
doing, what they are saying or what they are writing about, even if they have
more than likely not read the others' books. Negri is not aloof enough and too
much of a class warrior for Zizek and Badiou. Badiou is too rarefied for Negri,
and Zizek publishes so many books that even he probably doesn't have time to
read them all.
The New 'Communist Hypothesis'
It is early in the afternoon, and Zizek is sitting in the first row in the large
hall of the Volksbühne, forced to remain silent for an hour. He has many
talents, but keeping still is not one of them. Next to his chair is a plastic
shopping bag that contains everything he needs during the three days of the
conference. The room is full, and some of the roughly 1,000 members of the
audience are sitting on the steps. They are young people, most of them under 30,
a panopticon of leftist subcultures. Some are dressed like Brecht, others like
Sartre, and many of them look as if they were backpacking through Southeast Asia
and were about to start juggling with flaming sticks. All wear headphones, so
they can listen to simultaneous translations of Badiou's presentation in French,
Negri's in Italian and Zizek's and the other speakers' in strongly accented
English. Zizek, who is fluent in six languages, including German, is the only
one not wearing headphones.
Most of the presentations are difficult enough to understand in their original
languages. Translated, they become virtually unintelligible. But the point is
not to provide easy or concrete answers, which are readily available from the
Left Party or the unions. The conference is also not about looking back into
history, back into the gloomy 20th century, with the catastrophes that occurred
in the name of communism and the more than 30 million people who were murdered
under Stalin and Pol Pot; the labor camps, the police states. This conference is
about theory. It's about a new "communist hypothesis," as Badiou calls it, about
universalism, the subject in history, events of truth, Hegel and psychoanalysis
after Jacques Lacan.
The word "communism" is printed in large letters on the roof of the theater on
Rosa Luxemburg Square. But what are all these people doing here? Outside, in the
streets of Berlin, summer has finally arrived. The attendees could just as well
be drinking beer and watching one of the World Cup matches being broadcast on
large screens.
Pop-Star Philosophers
Some 20 years after the tentative end of the communist experiment, and exactly
21 months after the near-collapse of the capitalist status quo, there is
apparently a new yearning -- not for leftist policy, but for leftist theory. As
practical problems become more pressing, our democracy becomes weary, the euro
seems headed for failure, Germany's coalition government becomes less and less
effective, and the banks more and more unmanageable, the more abstract does the
search for truth and the practice of philosophy become.
Philosophy no longer moves society the way it did until the end of the 1960s,
writes Karl Heinz Bohrer in the current issue of the magazine Merkur. But
thinking has changed in the last few decades. Philosophy has become cultural
criticism, more essayistic, more volatile, more anecdotal and more literary --
in the vein of the French philosophers Deleuze, Foucault and Roland Barthes, and
of people like Peter Sloterdijk.
This brand of theory also has to be consistently sexy. It has to entertain,
provoke and be easily quotable in the form of sound bites and physically
palpable like rock music. Zizek delivers all of the above. One could say that
he's reinvented the profession. Some would say he's defiled the profession.
Badiou gives the introduction, and Zizek, sitting in the first row, can hardly
remain in his seat. He moves his lips as if he were giving the talk himself.
Badiou is an affable, well-dressed elderly gentleman. He doesn't look like an
enemy of the state, but more like an easy-going East German pensioner. Negri,
who is also sitting on the stage, looks like Badiou's polar opposite. He seems
emaciated, as if he had just been released from prison, and not nine years ago.
Badiou quotes Mao in his introduction: "Be resolute, fear no sacrifice and
surmount every difficulty to win victory."
And just as the audience looks ready to cringe, Zizek interrupts Badiou to quote
Samuel Beckett instead: "Try again. Fail again. Fail better." He laughs and
looks around to see if anyone is laughing with him.
He can speak more quickly than he can think. He's like a jackhammer. He has
published more than 50 books, which have been translated into more than 20
languages. His most recent book, "Living in the End Times," is a 400-page
treatise on the demise of the liberal democracy.
He gives more than 200 lectures a year and has held visiting professorships at
elite American universities. He recently spoke to an audience of 2,000 people in
Buenos Aires. He is the subject of two documentary films, and in another film he
interprets movies from a psychoanalytical point of view as he speeds across the
ocean in a motorboat. There are Zizek T-shirts and Zizek records, and there is a
Zizek club and an international Zizek journal.
'He'll Have to be Sent to the Gulag'
His repertoire is a mix of Lacanian psychoanalysis and Hegel's idealist
philosophy -- of film analysis, criticism of democracy, capitalism and ideology,
and an occasionally authoritarian Marxism paired with everyday observations. He
explains the ontological essence of the Germans, French and Americans on the
basis of their toilet habits and the resulting relationship with their fecal
matter, and he initially reacts to criticism with a cheerful "Fuck you!" --
pronounced in hard Slavic consonants. He tells colleagues he values but who
advocate theories contrary to his own that they should prepare to enter the
gulag when he, Zizek, comes into power. He relishes the shudder that the word
gulag elicits.
"Take my friend Peter, for example, fucking Sloterdijk. I like him a lot, but
he'll obviously have to be sent to the gulag. He'll be in a slightly better
position there. Perhaps he could work as a cook."
One could say it's funny, especially the way Zizek delivers it, in his
exaggerated and emphatic way. But one could also think of the more than 30
million people who fell victim to Soviet terror. Those who find Zizek's remarks
amusing could just as easily be telling jokes about concentration camps.
"But you know?" Zizek says in response to such criticism. "The best, most
impressive films about the Holocaust are comedies."
Two Posters of Stalin
Zizek loves to correct viewpoints when precisely the opposite is considered
correct. He calls this counterintuitive observation. His favorite thought form
is the paradox. Using his psychoanalytical skills, he attempts to demonstrate
how liberal democracy manipulates people. One of his famous everyday
observations on this subject relates to the buttons used to close the door in
elevators. He has discovered that they are placebos. The doors don't close a
second faster when one presses the button, but they don't have to. It's
sufficient that the person pressing the button has the illusion that he is able
to influence something. The political illusion machine that calls itself Western
democracy functions in exactly the same way, says Zizek.
His detractors accuse him of fighting liberal democracy and of wanting to
replace it with authoritarian Marxism, even Stalinism. They say he is
particularly dangerous because he cloaks his totalitarianism in pop culture. The
jacket of his book "In Defense of Lost Causes" depicts a guillotine, the symbol
of leftist terror decreed from above -- "good terror," as Zizek has been known
to say. The Suhrkamp publishing house removed passages from the German edition
of the book which reportedly toyed with totalitarianism.
There are two posters of Josef Stalin on the wall in Zizek's apartment in a new
building in downtown Ljubljana.
"It doesn't mean anything! It's just a joke," Zizek is quick to point out.
He says that he'll be happy to remove the posters of Stalin from the wall if
they offend his visitors. And he says that he is tired of being characterized as
a Stalinist. He has been sharply criticized in recent weeks in publications like
the liberal, left-leaning US magazine The New Republic, Germany's Merkur and the
German weekly newspaper Die Zeit. His critics write that Zizek's thoughts on
communism ignore history and are insufficiently serious, and that his theory of
revolution is downright fascist. And now he has even been accused, once again,
of anti-Semitism. Even Suhrkamp decided not to publish some of his writings,
arguing that they could -- maliciously -- be interpreted as anti-Semitic. These
accusations are opprobrious, but Zizek knows he isn't entirely innocent. His
constant drilling, poking and questioning is truly subversive, but sometimes it
makes him extremely vulnerable. He says that those who attack him in this way
have rarely comprehended his thoughts.
For Zizek, philosophy means thinking out of bounds -- far removed from practical
execution, as opposed to reality-based political science, which must have its
limits. When American leftist liberals accuse him of making a case for a new
leftist dictatorship, Zizek points out that it was he, not they, who lived under
(former Yugoslav dictator Josip) Tito and, as a young professor, was barred from
teaching.
The Itinerant Intellectual
Zizek's roughly 600-square-foot apartment looks as though Tito were still in
power. It consists of three rooms and is carelessly furnished. A poster from a
Mark Rothko exhibition hangs on the wall above the sofa in Soviet-era colors;
otherwise, the furnishings consist of a rack of DVDs, bookshelves, mountains of
"Star Wars" Legos and his laundry, which he keeps in his kitchen cabinets. He
serves iced tea in Disney cups.
He lives alone in the apartment, except when his son from his second marriage
stays with him. He also has a son from his first marriage. His last wife was an
Argentine lingerie model, 30 years his junior, the daughter of a student of
Lacan who, ironically enough, is named Analia.
Zizek wears jeans and a T-shirt, blue sandals from the Adlon Hotel in Berlin and
socks from Lufthansa's Business Class. "I haven't bought any socks in years," he
says. He stays in the best hotels, and he has just returned from a trip to China
and Los Angeles. He spoke about Mao in China and Richard Wagner in Los Angeles.
The Chinese had invited him because of his status as a communist thought leader,
but he doesn't believe that they understand his theories.
"They translated 10 of my books, the idiots," says Zizek. The Chinese translated
the books as poetry and not as philosophical and political works. The
translators had supposedly never heard of Hegel and had no idea what they were
actually translating. To make up for these deficiencies, they tried to make his
words sound appealing.
The experience of meeting Zizek is initially fascinating for everyone (for the
first hour), then frustrating (it's impossible to get a word in edgewise) and,
finally, cathartic (the conversation does, eventually, come to an end). Zizek
begins to talk within the first few seconds, and in his case talking means
screaming, gesticulating, spitting and sweating. He has a speech defect known as
sigmatism, and when he pronounces the letter "s" it sounds like a bicycle pump.
He usually begins his discourse with the words "Did you know…," and then he
jumps from topic to topic, like a thinking machine that's been stuffed with
coins and from then on doesn't stop spitting out words.
Empty Battery
Zizek has created an artificial character. His appearances are performances,
something between art and comedy. He says that he wants to get away from these
standup comedy appearances, and that he wants to give a serious lecture in
Berlin, mostly about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the subject of his new book.
He says that he has already written 700 pages. It would take a normal person 10
years to write 700 pages about the man who may have been the most difficult
thinker in the history of philosophy. Zizek wrote his 700 pages on airplanes in
the last few months.
A comforting thing happens after exactly three hours in Zizek time. Suddenly his
battery seems to have run empty, and the machine stops. Zizek has diabetes. His
blood sugar is much too high, he says, or maybe it's much too low. The symptoms
seem to be particularly severe at the moment. But Slavoj Zizek would not be
Slavoj Zizek if he were to describe such a thing in such banal terms. Instead,
he says: "You know, my diabetes has now become a self-perpetuating system,
completely independent of external influences! It does what it pleases. And now
I have to go to sleep."
On the way to Berlin, Zizek has not managed to put together his talk on the
plane, as he had expected. While the speaker preceding him at the Volksbühne, a
short man from Turkey with long hair and a long beard, is still speaking, Zizek
is shifting papers from one stack to the next, searching, writing things down
and furiously reading his notes. Strands of hair are pasted to his forehead.
Zizek doesn't just sweat while speaking, but also while thinking.
It is now the second day of the conference, and so far Zizek has had to content
himself by merely asking the speakers questions. Now, he immediately attacks
Negri who, on the previous day, had accused him and Badiou of neglecting the
class struggle. Negri's theory of the "multitude," that is, his concept of a
revolutionary subject that sees commonality in the differences among
individuals, assumes that late capitalism eliminated itself, and that this alone
is the source of a revolutionary situation. This is far too concrete and
pragmatic for Zizek and Badiou. Zizek arms himself with Hegel's concept of
totality, with Plato's concept of truth and Heidegger's concept of the event. He
argues that to one has to be outside the state to abolish it, but that Negri
remains within the system, which is why his "multitude" can never start a
revolution.
'Think I'm an Idiot'
Negri, furrowing his leathery brow, reacts testily. Zizek, he says, has lost the
revolutionary subject, but without a revolutionary subject there can be no
resistance. Badiou observes the argument with the face of an old turtle, as if
he were wondering which of the two he would like to send to a labor camp first.
The moderator asks Badiou whether he would like to comment. Badiou waves aside
the question, flashes a wolfish grin, and says that he intends to comment on
Negri, and perhaps on Zizek, as well, the next day. It sounds like a threat.
At the end of Zizek's lecture, an audience member asks a complicated and
unintelligible question. "You made a good point," says Zizek, and continues to
talk about Hegel. His response has nothing to do with the question, which in
turn has nothing to do with the lecture. The game could continue endlessly in
the same vein. Suddenly Zizek pushes aside the cardboard screen and interrupts
his Hegel lecture. "Okay! It doesn't matter. As I said already, you made quite a
good point. And the truth is that I have no response. In fact, my long-winded
talk was also just an attempt to cover up that fact!" The audience seems
grateful, now that Zizek has said that it's okay to say that you don't
understand something and don't have a clue as to what something is talking
about. Even Zizek does it.
"I know that people often think I'm an idiot," he says that evening, "that
nostalgic Leninist. But I'm not crazy. I'm much more modest and much more
pessimistic."
Why pessimistic? In fact, it isn't absurd at all to assume that capitalism and
democracy have reached a dead end. "That's true," says Zizek, "but I believe
that the left is, tragically, bereft of any vision to be taken seriously. We all
wish for a real, authentic revolution! But it has take place far away,
preferably in Cuba, Vietnam, China or Nicaragua. The advantage of that is that
it allows us to continue with our careers here." He ends the conversation by
saying that it's time for him to return to his hotel -- you know, the diabetes,
he says.
'See You Tomorrow!'
Late Saturday evening, just as the US and Ghana World Cup match is in overtime,
Zizek calls again. He sounds excited. "Did you watch my clash with Negri today?
Unbelievable! What is he talking about! That late capitalism is doing away with
itself?"
Zizek says that the revolution can never function without an authority, without
control, and that this was already the case during the French Revolution and
with the Jacobins.
He pauses. Zizek rarely pauses when he speaks, because it makes him feel
self-conscious for an instant.
Finally he says: The thing about the state and revolution reminds him of women.
"It's impossible to live with them, but even more impossible without them."
He seems about to talk himself into a rage again, but just as the machine is
revving up he suddenly interrupts himself.
"Oh, let's forget about it. I'll see you tomorrow, my friend!"
Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan
URL:
* http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,705164,00.html
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list