[Peace-discuss] When thieves fall out
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Fri Mar 12 02:25:43 CST 2010
'24', a diplomatic row and a spy chief's lecture on torture
US fury at ex-MI5 chief's claims that Jack Bauer
inspired interrogation techniques
By Kim Sengupta, Defence Correspondent
Thursday, 11 March 2010
American officials have reacted with dismay to the charge by the former head of
MI5 that US authorities deliberately concealed mistreatment of terror suspects
from their British colleagues. The unexpected public statement by Dame Eliza
Manningham-Buller is said to have significantly added to the strains in the
relationship between the two countries on intelligence matters.
At the same time, the former secret service chief faced criticism from human
rights groups who expressed scepticism about her claims of being kept in the
dark by Washington. Amnesty International said it was "extremely surprising"
that she and her organisation were unaware of the allegations of abuse which
were being widely aired.
The Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said Dame Eliza's
"revelations make an unanswerable case for a judicial inquiry into the alleged
mistreatment and torture by security services".
Dame Eliza's condemnation of American conduct during the war on terror comes in
the wake of consternation in Washington over a decision by High Court judges in
London to release sensitive, US-supplied information on the Guantanamo detainee
Binyam Mohamed. There was also angry condemnation across the Atlantic of the
release of Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi, the Libyan convicted of the Lockerbie bombing.
During a lecture given at a meeting in the House of Lords, Dame Eliza said the
British government had made an official complaint to Washington over the abuse
of detainees. But no futher details have emerged on either side of the Atlantic
of when this complaint was made, or what form it took.
In her speech, highly critical of the US's conduct during the war on terror, the
former secret service chief implied that the leadership in Washington was
inspired by watching the TV espionage thriller 24. She said: "Bush, Cheney and
Rumsfeld certainly watched 24". Dame Eliza said: "The Americans were very keen
that people like us did not discover what they were doing." She insisted that
she had been unaware of what was going on until her retirement in 2007.
One of her retrospective discoveries was the interrogation method used on Khalid
Sheikh Mohammed. When she asked her subordinates why the senior al-Qa'ida member
was offering so much information, they told her he was "very proud of his
achievements when questioned". She added: "It wasn't actually until after I
retired that I read that he had been water-boarded 160 times."
The White House refused to comment on Dame Eliza's allegations yesterday.
However, US security officials were said to feel particularly let down that the
charges had come from someone in her senior position, and denied that American
intelligence had used subterfuge with British colleagues.
A senior Pentagon official said there was "a degree of understanding" in the
cases of Binyam Mohamed and Mr Megrahi, because the hands of the British
authorities had been forced by the courts. The official added: "It is not
correct to say that we had kept relevant information from the Brits. There are
also a number of other points to consider. Khalid Mohammed was not a British
subject and not a British responsibility.
"Things are also done on a need-to-know basis. What was there to say that, in
that case, too, the courts would not have directed agencies in the UK to
disclose sensitive material? I would also like to point out that the Brits were
always very happy to receive information we gave them emanating from Mohammed."
Asked whether President George W Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Defence
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld watched 24, the official said: "We are not aware of
their television habits. It's quite an image though. These three busy guys
sitting down together at a very busy time to get their lead from Jack Bauer."
Tim Hancock, UK campaigns director of Amnesty International, said: "Numerous
allegations of US mistreatment of prisoners at Guantanamo and Bagram were
emerging from the beginning of the war on terror. Did MI5 learn nothing of this,
even when members of the security service interviewed nine British nationals at
Guantanamo in 2003?
"We also know from the Binyam Mohamed case that the security service was told by
US officials that Mr Mohamed was kept shackled, deprived of sleep and threatened
with being 'disappeared' by his US interrogators."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/24-a-diplomatic-row-and-a-spy-chiefs-lecture-on-torture-1919444.html
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list