[Peace-discuss] Guess the author (no googling)
John W.
jbw292002 at gmail.com
Sat May 8 16:09:02 CDT 2010
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:28 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu>wrote:
> You're wrong to be so censorious, John: I think Stuart has already
> occasionally
> said actually sensible things...
>
Indeed, he always does. That of course was the point.
> And your low opinion of your fellow citizens in this case betrays you:
> almost
> half of Americans believe that "From each according to his ability, to each
> according to his need" is enshrined in that Sacred Document, the
> Constitution.
>
Your source of that information?
> We don't have to make them interested in the "communist creed" because they
> already are; they see it as an American (and hence universal) ideal - at
> least until it can adequately besmirched as "Communist" by a Good
> Education...
>
And your point is....? Did you answer my question? Do you feel that you
did?
> On 5/8/10 4:46 AM, John W. wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:22 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu
>> <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> ... the remarkable unwillingness of supporters of the administration even
>> to
>>
>> hear the complaints of people like Stack is the real problem. The
>> willingness of the bien-pensant simply to dismiss them is outrageous and
>> even
>> dangerous.
>>
>> Stack wrote, "The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to
>> each according to his need. / The capitalist creed: From each according to
>> his gullibility, to each according to his greed."
>>
>> We don't make progress toward the former by acquiescing in the latter.
>>
>> So what do you propose, Carl? The bien pensant, as you call them, are not
>> INTERESTED in the communist creed, either in theory or in practice.
>> They're
>> INTERESTED in the capitalist creed as articulated by Joe Stack. All of our
>> laws and our customs and our culture and our social policies support the
>> capitalist creed. Short of flying an airplane into a building (which is
>> ineffective anyway), how do you propose that we MAKE them interested in
>> the
>> communist creed? How do you propose that we move America in the direction
>> of the communist creed? Wayne, why don't you weigh in, too? Quote some
>> Chinese, make some esoteric puns. And then maybe Stuart will have
>> something
>> to say that is actually sensible.
>>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100508/81113ab5/attachment.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list