[Peace-discuss] Fw: The Supreme Court? Is This Why We Vote For Democrats?

[unionyes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: David Sladky 
To: undisclosed-recipients: 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:39 PM
Subject: The Supreme Court? Is This Why We Vote For Democrats?








  
The Supreme Court? Is This Why We Vote For Democrats?
Wed, 05/12/2010 - 11:12 — Bruce A. Dixon
  a.. We vote for Democrats, the argument goes, because sending a Republican to the White House means sending racist conservative neanderthals to the Supreme Court.  A clinching argument right?  What would John McCain do?  But is that the right question to ask?
The Supreme Court? Is This Why We Vote For Democrats?
By BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon
Supreme Court appointments, BAR's own Freedom Rider Margaret Kimberley pointed out a couple weeks ago, are the clinching argument on behalf of every Democratic presidential candidate. Send a Republican to the White House, the alibi goes, and that Republican will send platoons of corporate-funded, anti-choice, authoritarian, warmongerng, racist, Constitution-shredding, pro-Federalist black robed goons to the federal bench, and one or two to the Supreme Court. Some alibis, like “the kid down the street does it all the time,” are true, but beside the point. The point is what kinds of judges do Democrats appoint? What kinds of judges is Barack Obama appointing? 
Back in 2009 we examined the pre-Supreme Court career of Sonia Sotomayor, comparing it to the pre high court careers of the only two previous nonwhite Supreme Court justices, Clarence Thomas and Thurgood Marshall. It was evident that Sotomayor's legal career bore a lot more resemblance to that of Clarence Thomas than to that of the illustrious Thurgood Marshall, who defended black people on death row in several states and campaigned for the undoing of Jim Crow laws for a quarter century.
Instead of some corporate-funded, anti-choice, authoritarian, warmongerng, racist, Constitution-shredding, pro-Federalist black robed goon, just who is President Obama sending to the Supreme Court? Who is Elena Kagan? She has little public record to go on, but what there is, is profoundly disturbing.
Corporate-funded? From 2005 to 2008, Elena Kagan served on the Research Advisory Council of Goldman Sachs' Global Markets Institute. Lawyers and clients are as a rule both consenting adults (whether human or corporations) and choose each other for their own reasons.
Anti-choice? As domestic policy advisor to President Clinton, Elena Kagan was a vigorous advocate of banning late term abortions, according to memos obtained by ABC News.
Authoritarian? Warmongering? Constitution-shredding? There is some evidence indicating that Elena Kagan supports a view of presidential power that would make Dick Cheney proud. When being examined by the US Senate for confirmation to her present post as solicitor general, Kagan agreed with the proposition that the entire planet is a “battlefield” and anybody the US government snatches from any spot thereon is subject to being considered something like what Bush used to call an “unlawful combatant.”
Racist? Pro-federalist? As dean of Harvard Law School she made 32 tenure-track appointments. 25 went to white men. Six went to white women, and one to an Asian woman. She managed not to hire a single black, Latino or Native American tenure track law professor. Several of her hires were prominent members of the Federalist Society, a cabal of right wing attorneys whose objective is nothing less than repeal of most of the 20th century. 
The damage that Republican Supreme Court judges like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, to name only a couple, have done is truly incalculable. If appointing a justice who could be counted on to undo and clear away some of that right wing wreckage is too much to ask, what does it say for the main reason, the clinching reason given for supporting Democratic presidential candidates? 
This is a crucial and defining moment for the presidency of Barack Obama, the instant at which he leaves his mark on the high court for perhaps twenty or thirty years to come. Retiring justice John Paul Stevens is indisputably the most “liberal” voice on the court, a man with a clear record of opposing many racist practices and authoritarian tendencies. Stevens is the liberal anchor of the court. To replace that liberal anchor with anyone less committed to upholding the rights of the poor and powerless is to unleash and further empower the likes of Roberts, Scalia and Thomas. That's precisely what President Obama accomplishes with the appointment of Elena Kagan.
Hundreds, even thousands of gifted attorneys have voiced their opinions in columns, books and law journals and blogs on the ills and evils of patriarchy and corporate rule, on the need to protect nature and the environment, on how to remedy historic race-based inequities, even on how to end the nation's universal policy of black mass imprisonment. None of them could be considered for the Supreme Court. We've come to the point where, to be considered by a Democratic president for a Supreme Court appointment, one has to be nearly indistinguishable from a Republican. What does that say about how people-proof and democracy-proof our parties and political systems have become?
It's time for everybody to face the fact that the gifted black man in the White House has not been kidnapped by corporations. He's not being muzzled by mysterious forces, and he's not waiting for some public or secret signal from on high or down low to start looking out for the interests of ordinary people. The black man in the White House today has more in common with the last two or three or ten white men in that White House than he's ever had with the interests of ordinary people. His differences with some of them, with Clinton, Reagan and the Bushes, are more nuance than substance. 
Historically, the last three Democratic presidents all came after Republicans. Democratic presidents, for some reason, do not succeed other Democrats,. They never leave small-d democratic legacies upon which to build. What the last three Democrats in the White House have done is continue and extend the work of their Republican predecessors after those Republicans have become too unpopular to do it themselves. 
Carter came in just after the end of the Vietnam war. He did what Nixon and Ford could not have done, committing the US to military intervention anywhere in the world that oil supplies were at stake, and began the enormous US military buildup in the Middle East. After Bush failed twice to get NAFTA through Congress, Bill Clinton made it his top priority, along with expanding the war on drugs” initiated under Reagan and Bush. For every two black men in prison when Clinton took office, there were three when he left. Barack Obama has banned the phrase “global war on terror” while he continues policies of torture, kidnapping and secret imprisonment, policies by the way, which Kagan endorses. While the financial crisis did break in the final days of the Bush administration, Barack Obama has shoveled upwards of $23 trillion in public funds into the pockets of Wall Street speculators, more than both Bushes and all his predecessors together. He has continued the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and Somalia, spread them into Pakistan and Yemen, and passed a bailout of the drug and private health insurance industries disguised as a health care bill.
While it's certainly true that John McCain might have actually have found someone with horns, pitchfork and a tail, and a pointy head covered by a white sheet to appoint to the Supreme Court, this is no excuse for what Barack Obama is doing to millions of the loyal Democrats who voted for him, who expect and deserve much, much better. It's really time to case excusing Obama by asking “what would John McCain do?' A better legal yardstick, and one closer to the measure of black America might be the life and career of Charles Hamilton Houston. A US army officer in World War 1, Houston attended Harvard Law School too, where he was chosen editor of the Harvard Law Review. He went on to be the dean of Howard University Law school and chief counsel for the NAACP, where he mentored Thurgood Marshall and the team of black and white lawyers who defended blacks on dozens of death rows and brought Brown V. Board of Education to the Supreme Court. 
Instead of lowering the bar of expectation by asking“who would John McCain appoint to the Supreme Court?” we ought to reclaim our own agency and ask “who would Charles Hamilton Houston appoint?” A former criminal defense lawyer? There hasn't been one of them on the court since Thurgood Marshall. A public interest, environmental, or anti-trust lawyer? A human rights lawyer who opposes torture and unjust wars? Or perhaps someone who isn't even a lawyer. The possibilities are endless, once we free our minds and our politics from the people-proof and democracy-proof choices between Republicans and Democrats.
Bruce A. Dixon is based in Atlanta, where he is a member of the state committee of the Georgia Green Party.  He can be reached at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com
 


 
  a.. Bruce A. Dixon's blog 
  b.. Login or register to post comments 
  c.. Printer-friendly version
Comments 
Very good questions
Cool Breeze - 05/13/2010 - 12:54 
Mr. Dixon and a very good article.
And the fact that such questions are neccessary at this point in American politics reveals to me that there's no question as to where the country is headed. As the political and capitalist elite become ever more aware that America's old myths are as impertinent as Pledging allegiance to the flag; they will also or maybe have already realise that they don't have to bullshit us anymore. They will/are beginning to simply shove it down our throats whether we want it or not; vote for it or not; believe in it or not.
The Great American Fascist Way has finally arrived.
  a.. Login or register to post comments
these appointments are more like favors
christianslayer1955 - 05/12/2010 - 19:22 
There is nothing serious anymore about this country.Every office and every presidential appointment has been turned into a game of favors...As they say in the streets,"It's not what you know,it's not even who you know,it's who you blow".I hate to take this discussion to the gutters but,it is already there.The real winner of the 2008 election was Hillary Clinton.Her husband was given a whole Island ( Haiti) to himself which he blew up so to rebuild as he sees fit.Now,Hillary's old girlfriends are being rewarded with supreme court seats.Anyone who continues to take this country seriously need to have their heads examined.America is like a cancer that has been festering for a long time and now,it has become full blown......Ain't no stopping it now....


  a.. Login or register to post comments
too precocious
epppie - 05/12/2010 - 16:35 
 One of the things I find interesting is how fast Obama and Kagan moved up through the establishment hierarchy.  Are they truly such amaaaazing geniuses?  No, I don't think so.  I think they were picked out early on and groomed.
  a.. Login or register to post comments
A Great Supreme Court Pick?
kiddwee - 05/12/2010 - 15:04 
Just knowing that Obama's handpick selection sat on the research advisory council of Goldman Sachs global markets institute was enough for me to know this pick was not Obama's pick but those who currently run this country and it smells like the NY FED, Goldman Sachs, Larry Summers, and Tiny Tim Geitner. This is America's ruling elite. I don't know if I would call them white outside of their skin color. It's time for PROGRESSIVES to stand up and realize those who call themselves DEMOCRATS that represent you only serve their corporate masters through payoffs, blackmail and Airplane rides (ie: Kucinich). It's time to suck it up and go your own way either third party or running against these corporatist. It's time to get them out. They have not served the people since 1968.
  a.. Login or register to post comments
you border on both denial and disrespectful....
christianslayer1955 - 05/12/2010 - 19:31 
You can disrespect Obama all you want because I,myself,have also lost all respect for the man.Nevertheless,stop acting as if he is this scared person who has been kidnapped and being forced to do all the ugly things he is doing....Obama is not being forced to do anything he was not told beforehand that he was going to do.People like you make me sick to my stomach with this unhealthy and corrupted love affair you have with Obama.Obama is a grown man who should be held responsible for his behaviors the same way you would hold your children responsible for the bad things they do.

  a.. Login or register to post comments
But, but, but,... I went 
Enlightened Cynic - 05/13/2010 - 10:57 
to Haaa vud, I was editor of the law review, surely you don't believe I can think for myself???  I' mean, after all, most people, (especially Black folks who get a hard on when you have Elite White Eastern School pedigree), believe I am the smartest man on the planet!!.
 
I swear I ain't stupid, but I am a big ol Uncle Tom.  "hee, hee."  
  a.. Login or register to post comments
In Whose Government Will You Live When The USA Is Non-Viable?
mathrise - 05/12/2010 - 14:05 
>From its very birth the USA has always been a racist oligarchy, never a true democracy.  As America falls economically, politically and spiritually, class and race war intensifies and slave descendants are forced to face the truth: We have never had, nor do we now possess Human Rights.  Under international law, Human Rights are the rights to our original language (Mother Tongue), original religion, original culture and the power to govern ourselves on some of this Earth that we can call our own.  The Democrats are just as opposed as the Republicans to Human Rights and Reparations for Afrodescendants.  President Obama has always been first and foremost the loyal servant of the intensely wicked white American ruling class.  Please do not wait for both China and Mexico to turn decisively against the obsolete American Empire and please do not wait for major food shortages and earthquakes in the USA before you help to build your own righteous political economy.  God blesses the Child who's got his own...government, land base, economy, educational system, hospitals and so forth.
Peace Be Unto You,
Malik Al-Arkam
www.allforreparations.org
www.nareparationstaskforce.org
www.afrodescendant.com
  a.. Login or register to post comments
I'm feeling ....
Enlightened Cynic - 05/12/2010 - 13:39 
your passion, anger and plea 150%, but I fear the majority of Blacks, Liberals or Progressive, whatever you want to call them, are brain dead.  The "race bondage" and "tribal" hold of Obummer (and the Dem Party) is stultifying.  I find there are few limits or depth to the stupidity of most people when it comes to failure to recognize Obummer and the Dems for what and who he/they  is/are, and calling him/them out.
 
Obummer is the greatest bambozzler of all time.  For all the "old school" groups at the White House, "hooping," and Jay-Z on the ipod ( likes and tastes no different from the average young white person), Obummer finds more affinity, and kinship for Elite, Establishment Whites than any other group.  He doesn't even associate with poor, working class whites.  He's an Elitist tried and true.  I guarantee a Lexis/Nexis/Google search would reveal his usage of the words "poor" and "black" 1 time for every 10,000 times he uses "middle class."
 
Kagan has been groomed for this position by the corporate elite, which explains, like Obama, how a "Harvard Law Scholar" could have an academic record bereft of any significant scholarship.  There are L-3's in "state" (vs. private) law school that have written more scholarly notes and comments than either Obama or Kagan.  Kagan earned her bonifides by hiring  a cackle of Federalists at Harvard.  I'm sure that the clerkship with Thurgood Marshall was part of the charade, kinda like Obummer's "community organization and affiliation with a Afro-Centric church" was a charade.  For these putz's it's all about meeting the right people and being in the right places, and pedigree.
 
Great essay.
 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100513/d23eedf8/attachment-0001.html>