[Peace-discuss] Obama’s bloody “endgame” in Afghanistan
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Thu Aug 18 10:59:04 CDT 2011
"Nearly two months after President Barack Obama announced plans for a limited
withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan, the evolution of US strategy in
the nearly 10-year-old war points to a steady escalation of bloodshed...
"Air strikes, which under the counterinsurgency strategy first introduced by
Gen. Stanley McChrystal in 2009 were to be sharply curtailed because of the
hostility they provoked from the Afghan population, are now being conducted at
record levels. According to figures released by the Pentagon, US warplanes
carried out 652 attack runs in July, more than 20 a day. This is roughly double
the number of air strikes carried out during the same period last year.
"Meanwhile, according to Pentagon officials, the number of commando raids by
special operations troops has more than tripled since 2009. From the beginning
of this year through the beginning of August, what the military refers to as its
“hunter-killer” squads carried out 1,879 missions—roughly 300 a month—compared
to just 675 in 2009 and 1,780 for all of last year.
"A US military spokesman boasted of the effectiveness of these night raids to
Bloomberg news: “Even if the primary target is not killed or captured on these
missions, 35 percent of those times, the next closest associate or another
individual directly linked to the target is killed or captured.”
"It is precisely this feature of the special forces night raids that have
aroused so much hatred within the Afghan population. Time after time, they have
resulted in the killing of innocent men, women and children, while subjecting
Afghan families to the humiliation of being brutalized and dragged out of their
homes in the middle of the night...
"Four hundred US and other foreign occupation troops have been killed already in
2011, which is on track to become the bloodiest year since the war began nearly
a decade ago...
"The White House and the Pentagon have effectively dropped the pretense that the
US is engaged in “nation-building” or winning the “hearts and minds” of the
Afghan people. Instead, the endgame of Obama’s war is to bleed the Afghan
resistance into submission and secure an agreement that will meet the
imperialist aims that have driven the war from its outset.
"These aims are bound up not with a war on terrorism but with geo-strategic
interests and corporate profits. They include establishing permanent bases in
Afghanistan, over which “strategic partnership” negotiations are now being
conducted between Washington and Karzai. The purpose of such bases would be to
assert US control over the strategic energy reserves of the Caspian Basin and
the main pipeline routes for funneling it to the West, as well as to threaten
China, Russia and Iran...
"Trillions of dollars have been poured into the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,
even as Democrats and Republicans alike insist that there is “no money” for jobs
and vital social services.
"Public protest against the war has virtually disappeared. The official
“antiwar” movement, dominated by a comfortable middle-class layer, has
integrated itself into the Democratic Party and busied itself with supplying
alibis for militarism under Obama..."
Full article at <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/aug2011/pers-a18.shtml>.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list