[Peace-discuss] Why Black MisLeadership Won’t Sign the Anti-War Petition
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Wed Jan 26 17:50:25 CST 2011
http://blackagendareport.com/?q=content/why-black-misleadership-won’t-sign-anti-war-petition
“We vow not to support President Barack Obama for renomination for another term
in office, and to actively seek to impede his war policies unless and until he
reverses them,“ says a petition signed by hundreds of social activists, only a
handful of them Black. The baton of progressive political and moral leadership
may be passing from Black America, dominated by a venal misleadership class that
refuses to actively oppose President Obama’s wars.
A Petition is making the rounds, in which hundreds of signatories have vowed to
oppose President Obama “as long as he supports war.” It’s the kind of message
that Dr. Martin Luther King would have signed onto. We know this, because that’s
precisely what Dr. King told President Lyndon Johnson, in April of 1967: that he
would oppose his president and onetime ally as long as Johnson continued to wage
war in Vietnam. Many believe that’s the reason Dr. King was assassinated exactly
one year later.
There are very few Black names on the current anti-war petition, but not because
Black notables fear assassination if they oppose Obama’s wars. It is because the
narrow and selfish class that has come to dominate the political life of Black
America thinks it can do better for itself by collaborating with the war makers
than by opposing them. Believing themselves to be somehow wired into power
through the Democratic Party and their corporate connections, these African
American misleaders are the political heirs to those Blacks that derided Dr.
King for taking his stand against Lyndon Johnson’s war. They are the same
opportunists that berated Dr. King for sacrificing what had been a close,
working political relationship with the most powerful man in the world, over the
issue of war. Dr. King’s answer to them was that the war must be opposed, not
only on moral grounds, but because it condemned the poor of the United States to
remain in that condition, by draining the government and society of all
available resources “like some demonic destructive suction tube.”
Dr. King was saying to the Black leadership class of his day: it may serve your
personal interests to collaborate with President Johnson and pro-war Democrats
and thus remain in good standing with power, but you are harming the interests
of the poor, of Black people as a whole, and of all humanity. To be on the wrong
side on the war, or to engage in endless dithering and delay in order to avoid
confrontation with power on the issue of war, is to work against the fundamental
interests of one’s own people. Dr. King was forced by urgent necessity to break
with President Johnson because war was against the interests of the Black America.
Obama’s multiple and expanding wars are no less antithetical to the interests of
African Americans, today. The “demonic destructive suction tube” that feeds a
trillion dollars a year into Obama’s wars strips Black America of all hope of
emerging from permanent Depression. As long as such fantastic sums are expended
on war, there is no escape from an economic race to the bottom that will mangle
Black society beyond recognition.
The Black misleadership class, fearful to protect their own, tenuous political
and corporate connections, give lip service to peace but refuse to confront the
President that makes war. In thrall of power in a Black face, and hoping some of
the benefits will accrue to themselves, they allow the baton of progressivism to
pass from the hands of Black America, or fall to the ground. History will look
on them with revulsion.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list