[Peace-discuss] Keeping the public under control

[C. G. Estabrook]

[Here's what a student journalist - perhaps 60 years younger than Noam Chomsky - 
made of one of his public lectures. It's not a bad summary of some of the most 
insightful political views available. --CGE]

Noam Chomsky lectures on nation’s problems | The Daily Beacon
http://utdailybeacon.com/news/2011/jan/26/noam-chomsky-lectures-nations-problems/
January 26, 2011

Topics presented to packed crowd included role of government, public relations

Renowned linguist, philosopher and political activist Noam Chomsky spoke to a 
packed house Tuesday night.
An emeritus professor of linguistics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 
Chomsky opened the lecture by telling the audience he wanted to address "some 
serious problems we're having here at home."
"The guiding principle (for American government) is that as long as the public 
is under control, everything is fine," he said. "(The traditional argument is) 
the powerful should gain ends by any possible means. As long as the public is 
kept under control, public will doesn't matter."
Chomsky referred back to this principle many times throughout his lecture and 
said it was the base of many of the nation's problems.
He said the principle was a security threat to the U.S. and was at the root of 
both terror and the huge military budget that is strangling the economy.
"The military budget is half of the deficit," Chomsky said. "The other half is 
the heavily privatized health care system. We would not have debt and might even 
have a surplus if we did not have (the health care system)."
Chomsky also discussed terrorism and the post-Sept. 11 United States.
"Bush said terrorists committed crimes because they hate our freedoms," he said.
Contrary to this statement, Chomsky said that Muslims actually hate our 
policies, not our freedoms.
Chomsky said United States' policies actually benefit Jihadists.
"The U.S. remains Bin Laden's only ally," he said.
Chomsky discussed the United States' support of dictatorships in Egypt, Tunisia, 
Georgia, Jordan and Colombia. He said this too falls under the "guiding principle."
"A post-Sept. 11 poll showed anger because of U.S. support of dictatorships and 
blocking democracy," he said.
Though Chomsky said the "guiding principle" was apparent in all aspects of 
government, he also said it could have very severe consequences.
"The most serious case is in Pakistan where there is a threat of radical 
Islamists getting a hold of nuclear weapons," he said.
Chomsky said this "guiding principle" is not a recent thing, though.
"Throughout American history, there has been a constant struggle over who should 
control and who should obey," he said. "The Founding Fathers were ambivalent 
about democracy."
Chomsky added that James Madison, one of the framers of the Constitution, was 
concerned that if voters could determine policy, it would challenge the privileged.
"This is why he put the power in the hands of the Senate, whose primary task is 
to protect the opulent minority against the majority," he said.
Chomsky also discussed the history of the labor movement and how it applies to 
issues today.
"The United States has a violent labor history," he said. "The rallying cry of 
the late 19th-century labor movement was, 'Those who work in mills should own 
them,'" he said.
Chomsky said this holds significance today, specifically with the automobile 
industry.
"Obama took over the auto industry, so the government owns it," he said. "The 
government is closing plants when they could turn them over to the workers and 
let them run it for profit."
He also discussed how history plays a role in today's public relations and 
marketing industries.
"By World War I, the business class realized that because of new freedoms, it 
was impossible to control the public by force, so they need new means," he said. 
"They tried to control of opinion and attitude to divert people from the public 
arena. This is why the public relations industry was started."
Chomsky called elections today "public relations extravaganzas."
"You don't want to provide information about the candidates; that's the last 
thing you want to do," he said. "So you delude people with slogans."
In regards to political parties, Chomsky said they have shifted sharply to the 
right.
"Democrats today are what used to be moderate Republicans, and today's 
Republicans are so deep in the pockets of business, you have to have a 
magnifying glass to find them," he said.
Chomsky also discussed tax cuts and their benefit to the wealthy.
"There has been a spectacular increase in wealth in the top 1 percent of the 
population," he said. "The Bush tax cuts of 2011 were made to benefit the rich 
but were crafted so people would not realize what was happening."
He said Social Security also plays into this.
"Social Security is actually in good shape, despite what you read," he said. 
"The rich want to get rid of Social Security, because it is based on the 
principles of compassion and solidarity, and (the spread of these principles) 
could be dangerous for the rich."
Students said they gained valuable insights from Chomsky's lecture.
"I though he did a very good job of historically representing what has been 
covered up in this country," Cori Kunberger, senior in psychology, said.
Chomsky ended his lecture with a question for the audience.
"Will we subject ourselves to the guiding principle?" he said.

###