[Peace-discuss] [Fwd: [ronpaul-305] Re: AGW]

[C. G. Estabrook]

Respondeo dicendum quod quodammodo una est veritas, qua omnia sunt vera... 
[Summa theologiae 1.16.6].

On 7/27/11 3:12 AM, "E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森" wrote:
>  Actually I copied in Barry Holley's post on rp305. the quotation is
>  not mine.
>
>  but- now we see as in a mirror, obscurely.
>
>  On 07/27/11 11:09, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
> > On 7/26/11 5:25 PM, E. Wayne Johnson wrote:
> >> ...As an hypothesis AGW is fine. As a religion, it is an
> >> embarrassment.
> >>
> >
> > As an hypothesis AGW seems to me quite probable. But this is
> > certainly true.
> >
> > (There's a remark attributed to Chesterton, "When people stop
> > believing in God, they don't believe in nothing — they believe in
> > anything.")
> >
> > --CGE
> >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20110727/3a484954/attachment.html>