[Peace-discuss] Lesser evil, or more effective evil?

[C. G. Estabrook]

...No genuine anti-war activist can endorse the war-maker, Obama. If  
you want to resist actual imperial wars, you must fight Obama. Period.  
Anything else is to endorse or acquiesce in his wars.

You can attend the United National Anti-War Coalition conference in  
Stamford, Connecticut, next weekend, where you can meet with an array  
of organizations to begin a calendar of activities that will stretch  
past Election Day. You can join with UNAC in working to stop Obama  
from doing a repeat of Libya in Syria and Iran. If you can’t bring  
yourself to do that, then I have no advice for you, because the  
alternative is acquiescence to Obama’s cynical duplicities.

If the Green Party or any other party firmly opposes Obama’s  
humanitarian, Orwellian farce, then support them. If they don’t, then  
don’t lift a finger for them.

If you are going to fight for anything, you’ve got to fight for the  
right to fight. That means fighting for the rule of law. So, if you  
don’t plan to go underground or into exile anytime soon, you must  
fight the president who claims the right to imprison or kill any  
person, of any nationality, any place on Earth, for reasons known only  
to him. The man who excelled George Bush by shepherding preventive  
detention through Congress – Barack Obama, the More Effective Evil...

<http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/why-barack-obama-more-effective-evil 
 >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20120322/ec71e244/attachment.html>