[Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] Finkelstein on Ghandi
Stan Waggoner
swag901 at ymail.com
Wed Sep 5 22:41:44 UTC 2012
First, I apologize for any duplicate emails you may have received. I promise I only hit send once. Gremlins I guess.
Second, my post was intended to be a little tongue in cheek. Building a third party at this juncture of corporate spending on elections is, I think, a fools mission. Therefore, the only choice that makes any sense to me is to move the Democratic Party further left, as the Republican party has been moved to the right by the corporations.
The Democratic Party of today looks more like the Republican Party of Reagan than I would like.
Stan
________________________________
From: Laurie Solomon <ls1000 at live.com>
To: Stan Waggoner <swag901 at ymail.com>
Cc: peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] Finkelstein on Ghandi
I really do not want to get involved in this discussion; but something
(besides the fact that I received 8 duplicate posts of the same message from
Stan) has triggered my response mechanism. I have two questions to
ask:
First, I think the statement (“We can defeat them tomorrow by spending our time trying
to build a perfect third party today”) is overly optimistic in
many sense of the term. 1) What evidence do you have that a third party will
result in defeating anyone in the future – much less bring about real policy
changes? 2) When has there ever been a “perfect” third party; and what make you
think that perfection is achievable – never mind any goal of absolute perfection
and settling for partial perfection at a level significantly greater than has
ever existed?
Secondly, since many of the Democratic faithful would never vote Republican
under any circumstances and see “bad” Democratic politicians and officials as
being the lesser of two evils, how do you propose the threat to vote Republican
or even third party to be taken seriously as a real threat by the likes of
Feinstein, Emmanuel, or any other Democratic politician or official? I
remember how Democrats complained about how votes for third party candidate,
Ralph Nader, cost the Democrats a Presidential election and gave it to the
Republicans. Given this sort of response to acting upon one’s threat to
not vote for someone from the Democratic Party, such threats become
meaningless.
From: Stan Waggoner
Sent: September 04, 2012 9:37 PM
To: David Green
Cc: peace-discuss at anti-war.net ; occupycu at lists.chambana.net
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] Finkelstein on
Ghandi
There is more of us than them.
Building
one from scratch means getting some from them, and
some from us, dividing both parties, and creating a third.
In
1856 when the Whig party was already dieing that was doable.
The
easiest way now is to move the Democratic Party further to the left. We do
it a step at a time, not moving mountains a Boulder at a time.
One final thought. Both Dianne Feinstein and Rahm
Emmanuel want to get re-elected. Without us they can not. They need
to know that. We may be able to defeat them today by voting
Republican. We can defeat them tomorrow by spending our time trying to
build a perfect third party today.
Stan
________________________________
From: David Green
<davegreen84 at yahoo.com>
To: Stan Waggoner <swag901 at ymail.com>
Cc: "peace-discuss at anti-war.net" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>;
"occupycu at lists.chambana.net" <occupycu at lists.chambana.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 8:22
PM
Subject: Re: [OccupyCU]
Finkelstein on Ghandi
If you bother to "take over" the party, then why not just build one
from scratch, or take over one that is not being used. You're talking the party
of Dianne Feinstein and Rahm Emmanuel.
>________________________________
>From: Stan Waggoner <swag901 at ymail.com>
>To: David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com>; "peace-discuss at anti-war.net" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>; "occupycu at lists.chambana.net" <occupycu at lists.chambana.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 8:16 PM
>Subject: Re: [OccupyCU] Finkelstein on Ghandi
>
>
>Ok, so those of us on the left should throw away the organizations that have gotten the Democratic party where it is, and start building a "perfect" Democratic Party. HooHaa.
>
>In the time it takes to do that, there will be nothing left for the "perfect" Democratic Party to govern.
>
>We need to go to the Democratic Party meetings each month, we need to call in to the Penny For Your Thoughts show on WDWS, we need to talk to each person we see, and tell them the truth. Anything less, anything other (third party), only lets the extreme right (Republican Party) destroy our country.
>
>We need to re-take the Democratic Party for the benefit of the PEOPLE not the party.
>
>Stan
>AKA Reasonable Man Stan
>WDWS
>
>
>________________________________
>From: David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com>
>To: "peace-discuss at anti-war.net" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>; "occupycu at lists.chambana.net" <occupycu at lists.chambana.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 9:03 AM
>Subject: [OccupyCU] Finkelstein on Ghandi
>
>
>http://www.zcommunications.org/gandhi-and-occupy-by-norman-finkelstein
>
>There is a lot to be learned from Finkelstein's study of Gandhi that is relevant to tactics being discussed on various local lists. Notice that elections and voting in our two party system are (tellingly) not even mentioned. Neither party is mentioned. In my opinion, Republicans promote the neoliberal agenda by proposing extreme measures. Democrats promote the neoliberal agenda by proposing compromises with Republicans. This has been a collective effort for goals that rulers of both parties support. It's worked pretty well for 36 years, since the campaign of 1976 when Carter was elected.
>
>There are worthy goals of equality and recognition regarding race, gender, sexual orientation, immigrants, etc. still to be achieved, obviously. Unfortunately, these goals are by and large co-opted as a part of Democratic Party tactics to win votes for their ultimately neoliberal agenda, which ultimately converts genuine grievances into identity politics. That is why, even given an understanding of the historical struggle for voting rights for African-Americans, I'm left cold by all the attention being devoted to voting rights by the progressive media. Of course there are legitimate ongoing grievances and Republican outrages; but ultimately an emphasis on "working within the system" is only to the advantage of the domianant in a system based on domination.
>
>And don't forget that both parties will try to run to the "right" of each other regarding foreign policy, especially Israel; ain't nobody gonna get my Jewish vote.
>
>David Green
>_______________________________________________
>OccupyCU
mailing list
>OccupyCU at lists.chambana.net
>http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/occupycu
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing
list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20120905/74ba9bb7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list